Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

89 into 82 what to do??

Tech Talk for Rover owners.

Moderator: Micka

Post Reply
User avatar
BJ
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:17 am
Location: Narbethong

89 into 82 what to do??

Post by BJ »

Got an 89 4dr (body #%@#d') 3.9 efi 5spd viscous and want to transplant engine into 82 2dr with LT95(tired).
Should I put the 3.9 behind the LT95 or fit new transfer to 5spd??
If so what sort of transfer, $? and can anyone plz tell me the different ratio's for high and low between the 2. Found the viscous had bad low range going down very steep hills!

Thanks BJ
Last edited by BJ on Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BLACKBURN 4X4 RACING
http://www.blackburn4x4.com/
http://stores.ebay.com.au/4X4-BLACKBURN
Nissan Spare Parts Direct
Ph. 03 9877 2755
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

Buy an LT230 transfer for the 4-door (much better than the borg-warner viscous). One from a disco costs about $500 from a wrecker.

Ratios are 1.2:1 high and 3.32:1 Low.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
User avatar
BJ
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:17 am
Location: Narbethong

Post by BJ »

The body on my 4dr is rooted so have to swap engine etc into 2dr. Will the LT230 bolt str8 up to my 89' 5spd?? Will the LT95 have better low range for crawling??
BLACKBURN 4X4 RACING
http://www.blackburn4x4.com/
http://stores.ebay.com.au/4X4-BLACKBURN
Nissan Spare Parts Direct
Ph. 03 9877 2755
Posts: 640
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 4:04 pm
Location: Snake Valley VIC

Post by Aquarangie »

The LT95 has a better low range than the LT77 unit, especially in first gear (I think the 95 has a 48:1 in first gear low).

I would use the LT95 myself as I'm not a big fan of the 5 speeds in general (that's why I went to an auto to be quite honest). A ruggard and noisy bloody lump of a gearbox but tough as nails and near on indestructable.

Trav
Land Rover- The Collingwood of 4WD's!!!!
Posts: 369
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by RangingRover »

The LT95 would definitely be a better crawler - 1st gear is about 4:1 in the gearbox alone, while most rover 5 speeds are 3.3:1 in 1st.
84 Rangie, 3 inch spring lift, 2 inch body, Megasquirted 4.6, R380, rear Maxi, 34x11.5 JT2s. Simex FM installed.
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

Overall 1st low would be 48:1 with an LT95 and about 40:1 with an LT77/LT230 (unless you have a special model with the military first gear fitted - 3.78:1 - 44:1 overall).

That is with 3.54 diffs. But with a 5-speed you can fit lower diff ratios and still have something that is driveable on-road. Also there are MD kits to lower the LT230 low range from 3.32 to 4.3:1 or 4.9:1
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
User avatar
BJ
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:17 am
Location: Narbethong

Post by BJ »

Thanks for your help guys. Appreciate it. BJ :D
BLACKBURN 4X4 RACING
http://www.blackburn4x4.com/
http://stores.ebay.com.au/4X4-BLACKBURN
Nissan Spare Parts Direct
Ph. 03 9877 2755
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests