Thanks for current pics.
Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
85 pajero spring over.
Moderator: -Scott-
Fist off, I applaude anyone trying to get more lift out of their IFS suspension.
On my own rig, I have done the most to maximise the flex from the front end , and left the ride height standard (the 33's help in the height dept)
The tai kit gets the extra lift by basically moving the whole lot down, cross member, bottom arms, and spacers for the upper arms, and links for the torsions etc.
With what you are doing, getting an extra 70mm over the 50 thats normally done, how are you fixing the problem of the front CV angle ?
If I trimmed the rest of my bump stops away, cranked everything I could, I could get 75-100 mm lift over standard, 2 ks down the road the cv's would be screwed.
The tai kit solves the prob by dropping the diff, to keep CV angles within reason.
how are you getting around this problem ?
You may be able to drop the diff 25mm without moving te cross member, which would alow you 75 more lift total, but at 120mm you will habve problems.
On my own rig, I have done the most to maximise the flex from the front end , and left the ride height standard (the 33's help in the height dept)
The tai kit gets the extra lift by basically moving the whole lot down, cross member, bottom arms, and spacers for the upper arms, and links for the torsions etc.
With what you are doing, getting an extra 70mm over the 50 thats normally done, how are you fixing the problem of the front CV angle ?
If I trimmed the rest of my bump stops away, cranked everything I could, I could get 75-100 mm lift over standard, 2 ks down the road the cv's would be screwed.
The tai kit solves the prob by dropping the diff, to keep CV angles within reason.
how are you getting around this problem ?
You may be able to drop the diff 25mm without moving te cross member, which would alow you 75 more lift total, but at 120mm you will habve problems.
Cheers
Mat
----------------------------------------------------------
92 Pajero 3.0V6 - 91 Pajero 2.5TD
Mat
----------------------------------------------------------
92 Pajero 3.0V6 - 91 Pajero 2.5TD
And so you shall.striker99 wrote:lets see them on the car..
I have completed my soa and ifs mods and it has all gone to plan.
the old pajero has never looked better and I had minimal complications.
The new lift has allowed me to fit 33" muddys with plenty of room to spare. (I fitted my brothers 35" wranglers just to see and had no problems.)
You can view the results at: http://au.geocities.com/alanmichellebel ... l_day.html
NB/85 3.8L GMH lwb pajero with sas front and soa rear end 33" mickey thompson muddys.
No poblems yet but i will keep this in mind. thanksmatwelli wrote:Fist off, I applaude anyone trying to get more lift out of their IFS suspension.
On my own rig, I have done the most to maximise the flex from the front end , and left the ride height standard (the 33's help in the height dept)
The tai kit gets the extra lift by basically moving the whole lot down, cross member, bottom arms, and spacers for the upper arms, and links for the torsions etc.
With what you are doing, getting an extra 70mm over the 50 thats normally done, how are you fixing the problem of the front CV angle ?
If I trimmed the rest of my bump stops away, cranked everything I could, I could get 75-100 mm lift over standard, 2 ks down the road the cv's would be screwed.
The tai kit solves the prob by dropping the diff, to keep CV angles within reason.
how are you getting around this problem ?
You may be able to drop the diff 25mm without moving te cross member, which would alow you 75 more lift total, but at 120mm you will habve problems.
NB/85 3.8L GMH lwb pajero with sas front and soa rear end 33" mickey thompson muddys.
Matwelli.
I understand where you are coming from but keep in mind that your truck (unless modified by the use of manual front hubs.) spins the front diff constantly even if 4wd has not been selected.
however the older 80's models didnt have this problem as no center diff was installed.
I am sure that the increased angle ( which dosn't appear that much) of the front cv's will have some sort of effect but I do need new front cv's any way and have been told by a bloke i no that did a similar thing that he had no problems in this area.
however i will keep all you have to say in mind and i guess time will tell the story.
Upon taking on this whole pajero lift idea i did expect to have a few teething problems so if cv's are the biggest I guess i'll have to modify this area too.
I understand where you are coming from but keep in mind that your truck (unless modified by the use of manual front hubs.) spins the front diff constantly even if 4wd has not been selected.
however the older 80's models didnt have this problem as no center diff was installed.
I am sure that the increased angle ( which dosn't appear that much) of the front cv's will have some sort of effect but I do need new front cv's any way and have been told by a bloke i no that did a similar thing that he had no problems in this area.
however i will keep all you have to say in mind and i guess time will tell the story.
Upon taking on this whole pajero lift idea i did expect to have a few teething problems so if cv's are the biggest I guess i'll have to modify this area too.
NB/85 3.8L GMH lwb pajero with sas front and soa rear end 33" mickey thompson muddys.
Very good job. I agree that time is going to tell the storie. I hope that everything will be ok (cause i thinking doing the same... 
)
Can you give us a photo that shows the CV's angle now? It's very important to see this...
Cheers
)Can you give us a photo that shows the CV's angle now? It's very important to see this...
Cheers
Pajero '87 soft top, 2.6L turbo EFI mod, ARB locker, 2" lifted OME, 31's M/T
heres the photo of the cv angleconstapa wrote:Very good job. I agree that time is going to tell the storie. I hope that everything will be ok (cause i thinking doing the same...
Can you give us a photo that shows the CV's angle now? It's very important to see this...
Cheers
http://au.geocities.com/alanmichellebel ... angle.html
NB/85 3.8L GMH lwb pajero with sas front and soa rear end 33" mickey thompson muddys.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest