Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

coily front redesign

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply
Posts: 127
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 7:30 pm
Location: central coast

coily front redesign

Post by saffrett »

does and one have any ideas on the front of a coily. im so over it.
i want to move the diff foward a bit maybe 10-30mm because my 31 are still hitting the fire wall abit after the virtual lift .
there isnt much room in the front with the tie rod on the back so i was thinking maybe moving the chassis mounts back make longer arms and maybe a x link
any one know if air shox would be able to be passed or would be any good.
also any one know some one that will even look at moding a 4x4 .
the guy on the central coast will not look at any mods

any info on this would be a help
1990 lwb vit
4 in lift
winch,lockers,gears, 31's
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

oh yeah that guy?

bit more detail. What guy? I take it you mean the central coast of NSW.

Have you spoken to Sam at Overkill?
Ransom note = demand + collage
User avatar
A1
Posts: 3451
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 8:57 pm
Location: NEWCASTLE

Post by A1 »

Theres plenty of options ...but as above contact Overkill and have a chat they have already modded a few coilys and jimnys to 3link panhard setup ( not radius arms)


here's also some old pics of a coily (steve Azzopardi's from memory ) it had some slight mods .....


Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
[b][i] DAN [/i] [/b]


:silly:
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 5:55 pm
Location: Brizzy

Post by Big D »

That woulda cost so much to mod like that...
Posts: 224
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 4:47 pm
Location: Cornubia

Post by Sean »

http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j200/ ... Ezook2.jpg

It seems that the rear end is doing all the work from the body angle. It seems like it would have the same problem the BBM SCAT ATTACK did at Tuff Truck.

http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j200/ ... Ezook7.jpg

What up with the little springs? Would do they do?

Cheers,
Sean
[quote="v840"]fat chicks actually [i]do[/i] give better head cause they're always hungry![/quote]
Posts: 6221
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by v840 »

It could do with some more flex :D

X2 on the 3-link and p/hard. Its been proven to work well on zooks on a huge amount of rigs. Especially in the front.
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|.........SUZUKI..........| ||'|";, ____.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ]
(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

Sean wrote:
It seems that the rear end is doing all the work from the body angle. It seems like it would have the same problem the BBM SCAT ATTACK did at Tuff Truck.

What up with the little springs? Would do they do?

Cheers,
Sean
It was a bit more balanced than it looked, but you are right to an extent. This car was recently for sale and the rear end was reworked with the coilovers up through the floor, I am guessing to improve roll stiffness in the rear.

I believe the little springs acted like a rebound stop - when the front end went to full droop they come into play and allow a little bit more droop once forced by the compressed tyre, and help to save the coilovers etc from topping out hard.

In relation to saffret's question, the interesting aspect of Steve's car was a wristed control arm - One front control arm had a sleeve that went right around the axle so it could pivot. This takes the bushing bind out of the front end so has a similar effect to an X link. The X-link is a better solution though.

Not being negative, but the amount of work in getting a coil front end to work properly (X link, panhard rod work, new coil/shock or coilover mounts, longer arms etc) is massive, and at the end of the day, you are still left with a unique front diff, axle lengths, knuckles etc. It would be worth the effort if the front end was all WT as there are options for axles and diffs, but I can't see the point of doing all the work on a stock coil front end.

If you swap to a WT front end, (which is 35mm narrower) then you have a base to work with, but be aware that clearances between the X-link, panhard and steering box will get plenty tight as the tie rod moves to the front of the axle.

I am not convinced airshocks are viable for a road driven car. They are high maintenance items and atmospheric conditions, load, and temperature have big impacts on their performance. They are very difficult to set up for use other than in a rock buggy from what I have seen.

Just my 2c.
Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests