Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

show us ya shock hoops

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply
Banned
Posts: 2041
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:41 pm

show us ya shock hoops

Post by Red_Zook »

hey guys... designing new hoops, want something to look BLING....
any one got something a bit different??
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

OME N76. Not "Hoops" per se but mounts nonetheless.

Image

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 356
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 2:55 pm
Location: Canberra

Post by zooker »

Steve, how exactly is the top of that shock secured. Is there a bolt running right through?
98 WT LWB Maruti, 1.6efi, rockhoppers, 2" body lift, 2" springs, 32" BFG muddies, jimny Power Steer, front lockrite :-)
Posts: 870
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 5:32 pm
Location: sydney

Post by MART »

Here you go , Cheers Paul

Image



Image



Image



Image



Image



Image


Image



Image



Image
BLOWNZUK 1.3 efi,sc14 supercharger,hilux diffs,detroit lockers,stage 4 rockhopper,6 point cage,35 muddies.
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 3:04 pm
Location: On the loud pedal

Post by sanger »

I am in the process of fabbing some hoops. Will post up end results when completed.
Hardcore Wheelin' www.ozwheelers.net
- 94 Zuki - Lux diffs, SPOA, twin locked, 35's, 1.5" wheel spacers, exo, series 4 rockhoppers
Banned
Posts: 2041
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:41 pm

Post by Red_Zook »

Gwagensteve wrote:OME N76. Not "Hoops" per se but mounts nonetheless.

Steve.
VERY nice...
idea TAXED!!!

they look BLING!!!
im guessing its just 2 bits of plate, and a fancy jigga at the top?
Posts: 821
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:37 pm
Location: redland bay

Post by offroader-rama »

i run f250 mounts on my sierra there about 300mm high with 31in ranchos's dont now how to put up pics but brought them from here $100 a pair brand new :D :cool:
GU Twin cab TD42T compound turbos
lwb sierra ca18det, 37" "CANT HOLD ON"
lwb sierra g16a, daily driver
https://www.suspensionstuff.com.au/shop/
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

zooker wrote:Steve, how exactly is the top of that shock secured. Is there a bolt running right through?
Yes there is, a 1/2" bolt with a crush sleeve for the bush to ride on. Here's a photo of a rear one, not welded in place. I make them out of 3mm plate. I know they are easy to work with and offer a good strength/weight ratio, but tubular shock hoops aren't generally very space efficient. JMHO.

Image

Remember too that the maximum loads Sierras can generate are quite small compared to a heavier and coil sprung car, so they don't need a very heavy shock mount. I'm tempted to make my next set out of 1.6mm plate to drop the weight even further. It'd be interesting to see if they last.

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

i wouldnt - its not something you really want to engineer to snap off when you're in the middle of no where! haha 3mm is plenty lightweight - just dont eat that donut before you go out and you got your weight reduction! =P
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

Who says I drive in the middle of nowhere, any way, sierras drive fine with a shock missing.

I didn't say its a good idea, but the factory front shocks would not be over 2mm thick in any case. I did say I'd do it on MY car. For anyone else, 3mm would be fine.

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

You don't need to go stupid on every mount, bracket, hinge etc etc

3MM is fine .. these things are not desert racers and dont have shocks that take 100kgs to compress.

In my experience people love to "over engineer" stuff as it is way easier working with thick heavy plate in terms of welding (A skill sadly lacking in many who mod their vehicles) ...

if the mounts are well designed ( as Steve's are) why weld a couple of bits of 5mm plate to a 2mm thick chassis ?

Sure if it were a coilover moynt, beef it up a bit, bu tthese mounts should only ever take a relatively small load. The Spring mount\s and bumpstops etc should wear the brunt of most of the force.
Last edited by Guy on Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Posts: 821
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:37 pm
Location: redland bay

Post by offroader-rama »

there is a difference between over engineering and not wanting to go back to it, if it dont work.
with out being stupid :? I'd say go a bit further at least where it joins chassis rail, that way you know it wont brake, especialy if your mounting your hoop much higher of your chassis, i used f250 and the eye of the shock is 280 mm about the top of the chassis rail, thats a lot of leaverage to twist rails.
GU Twin cab TD42T compound turbos
lwb sierra ca18det, 37" "CANT HOLD ON"
lwb sierra g16a, daily driver
https://www.suspensionstuff.com.au/shop/
User avatar
NIK
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:13 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by NIK »

I got hoops cant post picks but just the standard 2 maybe 2" tubes welded to chassis with hoops welded to them. First offroad trip ripped out driver side, 1yr later ripped out passenger side on road. Plated the area top to bottom 6" wide rewelded on. Cracked driver side so rewelded and gusset between hoop and chassis went out today ripped out passenger side on a dirt road.
Point being I dont think big shock hoops should be welded to zuks chassis without additional support as there is alot of leverage + the shocks are very firm 2hands stuggle to compress (pro comp I think).
Wasnt MY design and Im not bagging the person who done it just lettin others know stiff shocks lotsa leverage and 2mm steel dont mix well :oops:
Nik
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

I'm not bagging what anyone has done, but IMHO shock mounts (are any significant structural chassis work should be attached to the chassis in 2 planes.

My mounts weld to the chassis on the full height of the rail, and the full width of the rail. There's nearly 800mm (yes, 800mm) of weld holding each mount to the doubling plates, and another 800mm of weld holding the doubling plates to the chassis.

I don't believe it's possible to the mount to break off the chassis without the shock breaking out of the top of the mount - a much less severe failure form the point of view of the structure of the car.

All the factory mounts on a suzuki are very light and have very little weld holding them on, but they are all welded in more than one plane. Factory engineers are quite clever ;) It pays to look at the way they do things.

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
User avatar
NIK
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:13 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by NIK »

I forgot to say in the last post your mounts look :cool: . Mine BEFORE they cracked would flex just shaking them by hand.
Nik
Posts: 1413
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 5:54 pm
Location: Perth

Post by Moph »

Just picked up an OME 2" suspension kit cheap ($300). Rugged Trail (US) Nitro Cell shocks front; no name shocks rear (red). Has been fitted to a car for 2 years but it's been of the road for a year.

Q1: What your thoughts are on the SHS shock mount the guy had fabbed for the front (see below). The shocks have a screw mount and two horizontal bushes at the top rather than an eyelet and bush as per Ranchos. If I took this approach, I'd weld two gusset plates on the back of the mount and weld to the top of the chassis rail too as this is the weak point in his setup.

Q2: Noob question. I'm looking to fit 31 x 10.5 'Pedes at some stage, probably on 8" rims. Will 2" OME + bumpstops + existing 2" BL and seam bash clear these? Guy I bought the OME off was running 2" OME + 2" shackles + 2" BL to fit 31's which seems excessive.

Image Image

PS The guy I bought these off has a grey WT soft top tub (incl bonnet, gearbox and stuffed GTI engine, no doors, no diffs, no transfer) that he's sending to the wrecker next weekend. If anyone in Adelaide wants it, PM me and I'll give him your number.
Posts: 2169
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: melbourne

Post by joeblow »

nice simple 8mm plate attaching to 3 positions on the chassis.

Image
lwb 1.6efi,4sp auto,f&r airlockers,dual t/cases.custom coils.builder of ROAD LEGAL custom suzukis...and other stuff.
CAD modelling-TECH drawings-DXF preparation.
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: Shidney

Post by RockHopper »

Nice setup Joe, but you better go easy on those cigarettes :?
Like your set up too Steve. Simple, yet functional. Will be taxing your idea too when I finally get my car to the stage I can play with the suspension.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests