Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

solid vs tube drive shaft

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 5:29 pm
Location: Sydney

solid vs tube drive shaft

Post by AussieCJ7 »

I need a reasonably small OD drive shaft to clear the transmission oil pan, but having bent 2 now whats stronger tube or solid bar ?

It is a front shaft so as long as balance is close it will be ok
Posts: 870
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 5:32 pm
Location: sydney

Post by MART »

I had the same problem with a jeep I'm working on now , 350 chev auto , we put dana diffs in which moved the pinion to the drivers side and reversed the shaft so slipjoint was at top , the bigger trucks are running solid so maybe a chromemoly one would suit your application. Glen Dobbin at Dobbin Engineering make them for any application , so I guess solid would be stronger if your not worried about weight , I suppose they are breaking them cause there hitting on the transmission , Cheers Paul.
BLOWNZUK 1.3 efi,sc14 supercharger,hilux diffs,detroit lockers,stage 4 rockhopper,6 point cage,35 muddies.
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:09 pm
Location: Trying to hide the bus keys!

Post by v6hilux »

I think for short lengths, solid is fine, just harder to balance.
I'm the sharpest tool in the shed!
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 5:29 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by AussieCJ7 »

The shaft is about 1 meter in length

Mart in my case it was just tagging the corner of the bash plate under full flex

On a ramp it would clear but as your climbing a rock and fully flexed it would move the axle just enough to tag the corner. I have taken an extra 40mm out of the slot in the plate to that problem should be fixed now. I also found broken transmission mount so that would have compounded the movement.
Posts: 1232
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:37 pm
Location: Brisvagas

Post by Bad JuJu »

Personally I would just go with a thick wall shaft, not solid bar.

Also If you happen to land on a xxxxxhd tailshaft it would be more likley to bust the alloy tcase housing. Just a thought.
Posting quality not quantity!

Wanted: Stock HiLux Front Leaf Springs
Posts: 1676
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:26 am
Location: brisbane

Post by 1MadEngineer »

heavy walled tube can transmit more torque for a given mass- do the maths!
WWW.TEAMDGR.COM
WWW.SUPERIORENGINEERING.COM.AU
WWW.LOCKTUP4X4.COM.AU
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:16 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by KiwiBacon »

If you're restricted to a certain diameter for clearance, then solid is always going to be strongest.

But you gain very little strength from the solid centre, heavy wall tube will give up a more weight than strength.
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:09 pm
Location: Trying to hide the bus keys!

Post by v6hilux »

Why not shorten the existing tube, but cutting it down, and insert the thin solid for the part that has the clearance issue. This will equal half tube, half solid.

The end result will be your problem fixed with an easy to balance shaft.
I'm the sharpest tool in the shed!
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 5:29 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by AussieCJ7 »

Current tube is 31.8 OD 3.2 WT

Looking at the blackwoods catalouge that is the thickest wt for 31.8 OD and the next size up is 35 OD which will have clearence issues with the pan

The also have hollow bar in 32OD 20ID (my my calcs a WT 6mm) or 32OD 16 ID (8mm WT) would this be a better option than tube ?

The other option I was going to check was hydrolic pipe ??
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:16 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by KiwiBacon »

Sandvik have an excellent range of hollow bar over the ditch. Check them out.
Posts: 1836
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:41 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by badger »

if your that close that 5mm is going to pose a clearance issue id suggest perhapse lifting the box and transfer up a little bit or lowering your bumpstops a little as 5mm is not enough clearance for a drive shaft even 20mm is pushing it.
think about it this way you break a box mount and it will move that much. or you break a shaft and ther is no chance you transmission is going to live thru it.
also if you make the shaft too strong all you will do is break diff pinnions and transfers.

i totally agree with strenghtening the shaft but i recon there is another probem that needs addressing first.

ps tube is stronger than solid
1hd-fte 5 speed tiptronic 105 series
78 series troopy for work
gu ute play truck For sale
FTE 80 series sahara Sold

i think i have a problem
Posts: 3288
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 10:15 pm
Location: Central West NSW

Post by Slunnie »

On my Landy, the slip joint is placed where it would have contacted a crossmember. Perhaps that may be an option? Long slips even?
Cheers
Slunnie

Discovery TD5, Landy IIa V8 ute.
Posts: 870
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 5:32 pm
Location: sydney

Post by MART »

Pics would help , Cheers Paul.
BLOWNZUK 1.3 efi,sc14 supercharger,hilux diffs,detroit lockers,stage 4 rockhopper,6 point cage,35 muddies.
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:03 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by rvh96 »

AussieCJ7 wrote:Current tube is 31.8 OD 3.2 WT

Looking at the blackwoods catalouge that is the thickest wt for 31.8 OD and the next size up is 35 OD which will have clearence issues with the pan

The also have hollow bar in 32OD 20ID (my my calcs a WT 6mm) or 32OD 16 ID (8mm WT) would this be a better option than tube ?

The other option I was going to check was hydrolic pipe ??
that tube is no good for driveshafts we use tube that is made for this purpose it is high tensile cold drawn seemless made in the USA .the hollow bar would probably work ok but would be a bit heavy.the smallest tube we carry is 1 5/8 inch x .120 wall (41.3 x 3 mm) 1 1/4 x .188 wall is avialable (31.8 x 4.7 mm) but is hard to get sometimes it also comes in a .120 wall (3mm) pm if you want more info
'05 GU Patrol coil cab ST
6" lift
Tough dogs
Snake Racing drop arms
3rds Rear Arms
Twin ARB air lockers
37" trepadors
ARB bullbar
WARN winch
High flow turbo
3" mandrel bent exhaust
User avatar
Ice
Posts: 2429
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 6:52 pm
Location: Central Coast, NSW

Post by Ice »

same od diameter solid, v's hollow bar, same load on each, the solid snaps the hollow flexes a little but stays together
xxxx wrote:
:bad-words: :snipersmile:
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:16 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by KiwiBacon »

Ice wrote:same od diameter solid, v's hollow bar, same load on each, the solid snaps the hollow flexes a little but stays together
Oh BS.
For that to happen the solid would need to be made from pig iron.

Solid is stronger than a tube of the same diameter and same material. Always.
Posts: 3722
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 7:32 pm
Location: perth wa

Post by bazooked »

Ice wrote:same od diameter solid, v's hollow bar, same load on each, the solid snaps the hollow flexes a little but stays together
correcttttttttttttttttttttttt.
buggy time............
User avatar
Ice
Posts: 2429
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 6:52 pm
Location: Central Coast, NSW

Post by Ice »

KiwiBacon wrote:
Ice wrote:same od diameter solid, v's hollow bar, same load on each, the solid snaps the hollow flexes a little but stays together
Oh BS.
For that to happen the solid would need to be made from pig iron.

Solid is stronger than a tube of the same diameter and same material. Always.
Care to place money on that ? :armsup:
xxxx wrote:
:bad-words: :snipersmile:
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:16 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by KiwiBacon »

Ice wrote:
KiwiBacon wrote:
Ice wrote:same od diameter solid, v's hollow bar, same load on each, the solid snaps the hollow flexes a little but stays together
Oh BS.
For that to happen the solid would need to be made from pig iron.

Solid is stronger than a tube of the same diameter and same material. Always.
Care to place money on that ? :armsup:
Yep.
Can back it up with FEA models too.
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

Ice wrote:same od diameter solid, v's hollow bar, same load on each, the solid snaps the hollow flexes a little but stays together
what kind of load are u talking? side load or rotational?

i really have no idea with this at all but i just can seam to get my head around it :neutral:

and what kinda of material are u talking about to SNAP? most metals that we would use in this kind of application would just bend(or get dints then twist off) from a side load not snap, and if you are talking about rotational loads why are axles solid?and not just thick walled tube?
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:16 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by KiwiBacon »

redzook wrote:
Ice wrote:same od diameter solid, v's hollow bar, same load on each, the solid snaps the hollow flexes a little but stays together
what kind of load are u talking? side load or rotational?

i really have no idea with this at all but i just can seam to get my head around it :neutral:

and what kinda of material are u talking about to SNAP? most metals that we would use in this kind of application would just bend(or get dints then twist off) from a side load not snap, and if you are talking about rotational loads why are axles solid?and not just thick walled tube?
You are correct.

In addition to your common sense observations, hollow tubes can suffer local buckling and collapse.
Which is why you'll hear of hollow driveshafts being "corkscrewed".
Posts: 1857
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:16 am
Location: ipswich

Post by nastytroll »

hollow bar is stronger as it has to be distorted before it will fail, solid will shear at the centre point, axle are solid because most axle splines are rolled on not machined. If you wanted to make a drive shaft from EN36, HITUFF or similar it would be strong but for a small diameter over a long length it would get a resinance n vibrate. Remember your drive shaft is doin 2000+ rpm, the large drive shaft is for rigidity over the length.

Most modern motor bikes run hollow shafts for added strength and less weight
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

nastytroll wrote:axle are solid because most axle splines are rolled on not machined.
so you are saying hollow axles would be stronger then solid?
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:16 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by KiwiBacon »

nastytroll wrote:hollow bar is stronger as it has to be distorted before it will fail, solid will shear at the centre point, axle are solid because most axle splines are rolled on not machined. If you wanted to make a drive shaft from EN36, HITUFF or similar it would be strong but for a small diameter over a long length it would get a resinance n vibrate. Remember your drive shaft is doin 2000+ rpm, the large drive shaft is for rigidity over the length.
Back to school for you. The concept of a "neutral axis" is one you need to learn.
Solid does not shear from the centrepoint, all cracks grow from the outside in. Bending, twisting it doesn't matter.

Every component has a specific natural frequency, that's completely unrelated to this discussion.
nastytroll wrote: Most modern motor bikes run hollow shafts for added strength and less weight
Weight is the only reason for the hollow shaft. Hollow is not stronger, but it can have a better strength/weight ratio.
Posts: 1857
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:16 am
Location: ipswich

Post by nastytroll »

KiwiBacon wrote:
nastytroll wrote:hollow bar is stronger as it has to be distorted before it will fail, solid will shear at the centre point, axle are solid because most axle splines are rolled on not machined. If you wanted to make a drive shaft from EN36, HITUFF or similar it would be strong but for a small diameter over a long length it would get a resinance n vibrate. Remember your drive shaft is doin 2000+ rpm, the large drive shaft is for rigidity over the length.
Back to school for you. The concept of a "neutral axis" is one you need to learn.
Solid does not shear from the centrepoint, all cracks grow from the outside in. Bending, twisting it doesn't matter.

Every component has a specific natural frequency, that's completely unrelated to this discussion.

Weight is the only reason for the hollow shaft. Hollow is not stronger, but it can have a better strength/weight ratio.
your right ,I did not explain that well. Best of luck with the drive shaft problem Aussie CJ7.

KiwiBacon I'm obviously not as educated as you but solid bar does bend easily compared to hollow bar, compress 1 side expand the other ect, so would it not be more ridgid over the same length as solid?

I know solid does not shear from the centre, but hollow bar is used in alot of high torque application where rigidity is a must.

For a drive shaft I'm assuming being a front it will be around the 1m mark long, I would think being a small diameter spinning at high rpm ( assuming it will be driven fast) would the shaft not want to shake it's self out of the vehicle? is this not the reason centre lathes have steadies?

Its been a long day, I'm not being a smart arse but curious?
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:16 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by KiwiBacon »

nastytroll wrote: For a drive shaft I'm assuming being a front it will be around the 1m mark long, I would think being a small diameter spinning at high rpm ( assuming it will be driven fast) would the shaft not want to shake it's self out of the vehicle? is this not the reason centre lathes have steadies?

Its been a long day, I'm not being a smart arse but curious?
You are correct that a driveshaft needs enough rigidity that it doesn't begin to "whirl", basically flex enough sideways that it becomes out of balance, unstable and destroys itself.

As driveshafts get shorter they get a lot stiffer so you can get away with a smaller bar or tube for a front driveshaft than for a rear. Landrover used a basically solid driveshaft in the V8 discoveries, they had to to clear the cat converters.
User avatar
Ice
Posts: 2429
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 6:52 pm
Location: Central Coast, NSW

Post by Ice »

web wheelers at it again, shooting your traps off when all you have done is read something on the net,

yes we are talking about rotational force here.

why arn't axels hollow ? simple cost, take a big drag car, they spend the money and drill the axels, its not a weight saving issue either

lets look at say the prop shaft on a container ship, its you guessed it HOLLOW becuase it transmits a huge load

being hollow it has some give before it corkscrews, your solid shaft has no give it just snaps

you might think your educated but you obviously have NFI, dont concern yourself though many a qualified engineer has NFI and NO practical experience in industry either


i just make the things and repair them when they go snap so what would i know ?
xxxx wrote:
:bad-words: :snipersmile:
User avatar
Ice
Posts: 2429
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 6:52 pm
Location: Central Coast, NSW

Post by Ice »

redzook wrote:
nastytroll wrote:axle are solid because most axle splines are rolled on not machined.
so you are saying hollow axles would be stronger then solid?
yes tim they will take more Torque before failing,
xxxx wrote:
:bad-words: :snipersmile:
Posts: 2158
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:16 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by KiwiBacon »

Ice wrote:web wheelers at it again, shooting your traps off when all you have done is read something on the net,

yes we are talking about rotational force here.

why arn't axels hollow ? simple cost, take a big drag car, they spend the money and drill the axels, its not a weight saving issue either

lets look at say the prop shaft on a container ship, its you guessed it HOLLOW becuase it transmits a huge load

being hollow it has some give before it corkscrews, your solid shaft has no give it just snaps

you might think your educated but you obviously have NFI, dont concern yourself though many a qualified engineer has NFI and NO practical experience in industry either


i just make the things and repair them when they go snap so what would i know ?
Think about this for a little bit.
If solid bar has no give in it and just snaps. Then how do your springs and swaybars survive? :lol:

BTW weight matters a lot to drag racers, that's why they drill axles. When you're pulling up to 5g off the line, 1kg feels like 5.
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

Ice wrote:web wheelers at it again, shooting your traps off when all you have done is read something on the net,

yes we are talking about rotational force here.

why arn't axels hollow ? simple cost, take a big drag car, they spend the money and drill the axels, its not a weight saving issue either

lets look at say the prop shaft on a container ship, its you guessed it HOLLOW becuase it transmits a huge load

being hollow it has some give before it corkscrews, your solid shaft has no give it just snaps

you might think your educated but you obviously have NFI, dont concern yourself though many a qualified engineer has NFI and NO practical experience in industry either


i just make the things and repair them when they go snap so what would i know ?
I was under the impression that the axles on a drag car were gun drilled to reduce rotational mass, for the same reasons they use titanium spools etc and aluminium and or carbon fibre driveshafts.

Agin the container ship theh shaft is hollow to give it allow it to have a much larger circumfrence for the same or less weight than a soild shaft that will stand up to the same numbers. if you could run a hollow bar and a solid bar of the same circumfrence the soild will beat it every time, there is simply so much more material to deform before it fails. And if you think that soild axles dont have any twist in em before they go snap .. then I am sorry old mate .. but your the one who has NFI.
(Watch an axle in a test bed some time, you will see it will twist almost a full rotation before it begins to give, usually at the area where the splines meet the drive flange) You can see that the entire shaft is twisted

Image

One a hollow shaft has a stress riser in it, it will simply fold up at that point (Put a coke can on a hard flat surface, and gently get a kid to balance on it with on it .. it will hold them up .. touch the can gently with your finger and pull it away quick as the can folds up)

There is a good reason that most liner springs (torsion bars) at are not made hollow as they would be far to hard to engineer any other way. If you look at coil springs they are being twisted all their working lofe and are made out of heavy wire
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests