Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

How long is your Jeep?

Tech Talk for Jeep owners.

Moderator: GUtripper

Post Reply
Posts: 683
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 3:42 am
Location: Sydney

How long is your Jeep?

Post by GURU »

G'day all,

Just interested to know, what is the wheelbase of a jeep Wrangler, in stock form, and if you have made the wheelbase longer, what does it measure now? and was it worth it ??
[i]DAS[/i]
MY05 4.4L V8 Range Rover Vogue
Series 2a Buggy....In the Building
Posts: 384
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 8:26 pm
Location: Springfield/ QLD

Post by CJer »

Hey Das

The standard WB of a TJ is 93.4" (2373mm) as to moding wheel base no i have not done it and prob never will on my CJ

Heaps of info here if you need it http://www.jjournal.net/jeep/jeep/tj/
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 3:56 pm
Location: New York

Post by zzzz »

JLer is on the money.
As you lift it though, say 4-5" to fit some 35's it will decrease in wheelbase to around 91".

Lengthening the wheelbase to around 100-110" is a big job and requires extended custom made control arms, moving shock mounts and spring perches in the rear and moving the fuel tank into the back area and chopping out some of the floor etc.

If you want more detailed info about stretching one let me know.

cheers

z
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 11:22 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by CJGuy »

Do a google search for american expedition vehicles, or AEV conversions.
Plenty of info and pics.
BLAH BLAH, witty line , BLAH BLAH
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 11:33 am
Location: Melbourne, AUS

Post by FireTruck »

stock is 93.4, with 35's, 4.5" of lift and long arms mine was 91"... now stretched it to about 100.5" by moving the rear axel back...
Last edited by FireTruck on Wed Dec 17, 2003 12:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
www.TeamFireBug.com

Thanks to:
abt4x4.com - Just Customs
Staun beadlocks - Solid Axle
Cummins - Maxxis
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 7:44 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by MKPatrolGuy »

FireTruck wrote:stock is 93.4, with 35's, 4.5" of lift and long arms mine was 91"... not stretched it to about 100.5" by moving the rear axel back...


What length are the springs now, something like 4" lift in the front and 2" lift in the rear isn't it and still sitting level :)
[size=100][url=http://www.vickrawlers.com/]VicKrawlers.com[/url]
[url=http://www.drfwdc.org.au/]Dandenong Ranges 4wd Club[/url][/size]
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 11:33 am
Location: Melbourne, AUS

Post by FireTruck »

6" in the front (+ 0.75" spacer) and about 3" springs in the rear...
www.TeamFireBug.com

Thanks to:
abt4x4.com - Just Customs
Staun beadlocks - Solid Axle
Cummins - Maxxis
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 11:33 am
Location: Melbourne, AUS

Post by FireTruck »

Oh yea - is it worth it?? Can't say 100% yet as I haven't wheeled it enough yet.

I can say that from the little I have done it is much more stable and feels great. I think it has some to do with the extra wheelbase, and some to do with the improved link geometry.

Also helps to get a longer rear driveshaft which can be a bitch on lifted TJ's.

I had to re-do the rear suspension anyway, so I figured I may as well load for bear. If I was in the same position I would do it again... I like the extra length.
www.TeamFireBug.com

Thanks to:
abt4x4.com - Just Customs
Staun beadlocks - Solid Axle
Cummins - Maxxis
Posts: 1544
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Performing booty fab in my Garage

Post by Wooders »

My TJ is abot 94' ...which is only a marginal increase over stock......I'D like it to be 100+ but that means chassis changes...
Cheers [url=http://www.wooders.com.au]Wooders[/url]
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 11:33 am
Location: Melbourne, AUS

Post by FireTruck »

Not necessarily chassis changes Wodders, but definately some major mods!

I didn't cut or change my chasis, but did move the rear coil buckets, cut out the stock cross member, lift the fuel tank into the rear compartment, etc...
www.TeamFireBug.com

Thanks to:
abt4x4.com - Just Customs
Staun beadlocks - Solid Axle
Cummins - Maxxis
Posts: 683
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 3:42 am
Location: Sydney

Post by GURU »

FireTruck, How did you find your wrangler for stability at 91" was it really uneasy especially down hills??

have you noticed the loss of turning circle much?? what about the chassis clearance (ramp over angle)??
[i]DAS[/i]
MY05 4.4L V8 Range Rover Vogue
Series 2a Buggy....In the Building
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 11:33 am
Location: Melbourne, AUS

Post by FireTruck »

noticeable difference between 91 and 100" for sure!! Particularly on steep up and down hills.

Ramp over angle is actually better now, because I went from 35's to 38.5's, and changed mt t'case to an Atlas, lifted my t'case skid a couple of inches etc.

Turning circle is worse now because I am now running wider axels and Detroits rather that ARB's before...

As you can see, kinda hard to compare apples with apples!!
www.TeamFireBug.com

Thanks to:
abt4x4.com - Just Customs
Staun beadlocks - Solid Axle
Cummins - Maxxis
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests