Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

33's not road worthy???

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 7:41 pm

33's not road worthy???

Post by eskii »

Selling my maverick and went to get a RWC for it.

The guy said that it's not road worthy with 33's on it, "they're too big"

Thoughts?
Posts: 417
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 8:30 pm
Location: NSW

Post by Modified Toy »

what state you in?
Posts: 2480
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: NSW

Re: 33's not road worthy???

Post by r0ck_m0nkey »

eskii wrote:Thoughts?
I think they're too big and not road worthy.
If God did not intend for us to eat animals, then why did he make them out of meat?
Posts: 272
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: Gettin my teef knocked out by tufflux88

Re: 33's not road worthy???

Post by k3lst »

eskii wrote:Selling my maverick and went to get a RWC for it.

The guy said that it's not road worthy with 33's on it, "they're too big"

Thoughts?
Have a read through the crap im having to deal with atm,...

http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/ftopic155218.php
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

Thoughts? You're pushing sh!t a long way up hill if you think you'll get around this. If you were planning to keep the vehicle it might be worth investigating the engineering side of it, or waiting for the NCOP to be adopted (but don't hold your breath!) But, since you're selling, you want to get out of this as cheap as possible.

Personally, I would ask around a few local tyre stores - explain the issue, that you just want a RWC, see if anybody will do a swap for you. Swap your 33s for something which will pass a RWC. If your 33s are good it should be easy to arrange.
Posts: 432
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Tamborine, QLD. QUEENSLANDER!!!!!!

Post by dano80 »

If they're stamped 33x...... then they are probably illegal, but if they're stamped 285/75/16, then it should be all good.

I run 33 x 12.50 x 15's. Never had any issues, but I haven't tried to sell it before. Maybe try another place for RWC, some guys are fussier than others.

Best of luck.

Cheers, Dano.
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Re: 33's not road worthy???

Post by bogged »

eskii wrote:Selling my maverick and went to get a RWC for it.

The guy said that it's not road worthy with 33's on it, "they're too big"

Thoughts?
as said, what state, and on what rig?
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: 33's not road worthy???

Post by -Scott- »

bogged wrote:
eskii wrote:Selling my maverick and went to get a RWC for it.

The guy said that it's not road worthy with 33's on it, "they're too big"

Thoughts?
as said, what state, and on what rig?
At a guess, I'd say that, on this occasion, "maverick" is a noun and not an adjective.
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Re: 33's not road worthy???

Post by bogged »

-Scott- wrote:
bogged wrote:
eskii wrote:Selling my maverick and went to get a RWC for it.

The guy said that it's not road worthy with 33's on it, "they're too big"

Thoughts?
as said, what state, and on what rig?
At a guess, I'd say that, on this occasion, "maverick" is a noun and not an adjective.
too much Cab sav after a day in the sun at the bike track :oops: :oops: stop picking on me :rofl: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:
Posts: 14668
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:10 pm
Location: western shitney

Re: 33's not road worthy???

Post by j-top paj »

r0ck_m0nkey wrote:
eskii wrote:Thoughts?
I think they're too big and not road worthy.

33s might be big on a zook :finger:
Banzy wrote:Dial up internet.........you'd post something and come back 2 beers later to see if it loaded.
my GU
Posts: 1791
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:02 pm
Location: Kurrajong Heights, NSW

Post by BlueSuzy »

I have 33's :finger:
I am Tim
Im here for the sausage!
Posts: 15646
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 7:11 pm
Location: NEWCASTLE

Post by DIRTY ROCK STAR »

go to another shop.
EVERYONE LOVES A 40
www.lovells.com.au
RAW4x4
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:54 am
Location: nsw

Post by poppywhite »

what state u in????
online regocheck makes it more difficult just to go someware else.
Do any friends relo's PPl were you work have more acceptable wheel with tyre you could borrow for test and swap back after
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:45 pm
Location: YES

Post by THICKNICK »

very unlikely you will find someone willing to pass 33s if your selling the vehicle.

if you just bought it different story, hence why many people dont sell fourbys with rwc as they wouldnt be able to get one, yet you buy it drive down to the same guy and he'll write it up.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Posts: 1187
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 5:05 pm
Location: melbourne, Knoxfield

Post by matthewK »

i managed 33s on my 60 here in vic from the road worthy shop in dandenong,
1995 land rover disco on 265 muddies
Posts: 1857
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:16 am
Location: ipswich

Post by nastytroll »

Check the manufactures specs on diametre if in Qld, basic law is +15mm to -26mm. Standard tyre ;) is a 7.50 16 which measures 815mm, most 33" tyres measure 830mm which is leagal.


You will need the manufacturers tyre size handbook/flyer that shows the diameters to back it up, also the qld modifications flyer that states the sizes.
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:56 pm
Location: sunshine coast

Post by high ridin »

I got my old swb mav defected by the transprt department & it went over the pits & I had no worries with my 33" mud stars
Posts: 4330
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:06 pm
Location: Central Victoria

Post by coxy321 »

Just borow/hire/steal some 31's for the day its going in for a RWC. I've done this for ALL of the 4x4's i've owned. I think there's a 14 or 30 day period after a Vic RWC that puts the workshop responsible up until that date for an unroadworthy vehicle. After the safety period - go your hardest!!!
Posts: 14668
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:10 pm
Location: western shitney

Post by j-top paj »

my 35s passed without a question asked :D
and all the other mods also :armsup:
Banzy wrote:Dial up internet.........you'd post something and come back 2 beers later to see if it loaded.
my GU
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

coxy321 wrote:I think there's a 14 or 30 day period after a Vic RWC that puts the workshop responsible up until that date for an unroadworthy vehicle. After the safety period - go your hardest!!!
I've often wondered about that, due to people doing what you have said.

anyone know how long the 'grace' period is that the workshop is liable??? Its pretty fawkt for the workshop owner to have any responsibility since as soon as the bloke drives out after the roady, he could do a burnout down to the rims.
Posts: 2169
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: melbourne

Post by joeblow »

road worthy AND engineers reports are only valid for 28 days. thats why you will find a lot of workshops and engineers taking heaps of photos of said vehicles. that way if they get pulled up on it they have proof. usually workshops will take pics without telling you.
lwb 1.6efi,4sp auto,f&r airlockers,dual t/cases.custom coils.builder of ROAD LEGAL custom suzukis...and other stuff.
CAD modelling-TECH drawings-DXF preparation.
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

joeblow wrote:... engineers reports are only valid for 28 days.
- meaning you get 28days to inform Vicroads etc??
can you explain a bit more what you mean here only valid 28 days?
Posts: 2169
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: melbourne

Post by joeblow »

if you don't submit it to vic roads within that period you will have to pay the full amount of the engineers bill again. i've been pulled over once a couple of years after the report was issued and as long as what is on the report matches what they vehicle has you will be fine, if they detect otherwise they can make you go for another one.
lwb 1.6efi,4sp auto,f&r airlockers,dual t/cases.custom coils.builder of ROAD LEGAL custom suzukis...and other stuff.
CAD modelling-TECH drawings-DXF preparation.
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php
Im here for the sausage!
Posts: 15646
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 7:11 pm
Location: NEWCASTLE

Post by DIRTY ROCK STAR »

joeblow wrote:road worthy AND engineers reports are only valid for 28 days. thats why you will find a lot of workshops and engineers taking heaps of photos of said vehicles. that way if they get pulled up on it they have proof. usually workshops will take pics without telling you.

man my engineer doesnt know what a camera is.
hes still living in the 1800's. but hes a top bloke. :D
EVERYONE LOVES A 40
www.lovells.com.au
RAW4x4
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

joeblow wrote:if you don't submit it to vic roads within that period you will have to pay the full amount of the engineers bill again.
Cheers mate.. I went to Vicroads on the way home from gettin my engineers on the GQ....
So Vicroads would have all data on the engineers on file?
Posts: 2195
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:38 pm
Location: Sunny Coast, Queensland

Post by Simo63 »

I have heard through a tyre fitter I know that 285/75/16's are oversize for my 80 series so I would guess they would also be oversize for a GQ as well. I haven't had any issues though however I can see where the mechanic providing the RWC is coming from. His RWC license is worth a lot to his income so he's understandably not willing to risk that by doing the wrong thing and that's fair enough. A mechanic mate of mine takes a picture of every car he does a RW on to prove it had the right wheels on it.

Solution?? What you need to do is buy a set of road legal standard sized wheels and tyres and get the RWC with them fitted. Then sell the car to the new buyer with the legal tyres fitted and the 33's in the back (good idea to take a picture of it to prove it). Then you are covered and so is the mechanic that provided the RWC.
Last edited by Simo63 on Tue Oct 28, 2008 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TD 80 Series, F&R Lockers, Winch etc
Posts: 2169
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: melbourne

Post by joeblow »

bogged wrote:
joeblow wrote:if you don't submit it to vic roads within that period you will have to pay the full amount of the engineers bill again.
Cheers mate.. I went to Vicroads on the way home from gettin my engineers on the GQ....
So Vicroads would have all data on the engineers on file?
yep, they should have a copy, you have a copy and the engineer will have a copy. i'm pretty sure on thier computer system it will have a reference to your report number when they bring up your details.
lwb 1.6efi,4sp auto,f&r airlockers,dual t/cases.custom coils.builder of ROAD LEGAL custom suzukis...and other stuff.
CAD modelling-TECH drawings-DXF preparation.
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 7:41 pm

Post by eskii »

Victoria i'm in.

So if I do a swapsies with 31's for the day, that should be alright...

Kinda sounds crazy that 33's don't pass. But laws are laws i guess.

Sucks a heap coz i bought the car with same tyres! baha
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

33s are legal on a Patrol but it may be the width that is the issue if they are 12.5s they are probably sticking out. Maybe talk to the guy and get a bit more detailed explanation from him about what he actually means "Are too big"
Ransom note = demand + collage
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Lara Victoria

Post by Ruffy »

grimbo wrote:33s are legal on a Patrol
Not in your state there not!
The largest diameter tyre a GQ patrol came out of the factory with was a 235/85/16. That gives it an overall height of 31 3/4 inches or 806 mm.
Given that you are only allowed to increase tyre size by 15 mm a 33 inch tyre is too tall.
[quote="Uhhohh"]As far as an indecent proposal goes, I'd accept nothing less than $100,000 to tolerate buggery. Any less and it's just not worth the psychological trauma. [/quote]
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests