Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
2.6l weber conversion Q's
Moderator: -Scott-
2.6l weber conversion Q's
Hey all i have a question or 2 for anyone who may know the answer, is the 32/36 a good weber to use for a pajero conversion?
thanks in advance.
thanks in advance.
32/36 refers only to the barrel sizes - 32mm primary, 36mm secondary. Do you have additional model information?
Barring that, I had a 32/36 DCD on a reasonably worked 1700 Galant, and I suspect the carby was one of the limiting factors on that motor. It had 92hp at the wheels, and (much later) I read that carby is probably only good for 125hp (flywheel) - so I probably wasn't far off.
If you're planning to keep the motor essentially stock, it may be sufficient. If you're looking to extract more horsepower, I would look for something a little larger.
Barring that, I had a 32/36 DCD on a reasonably worked 1700 Galant, and I suspect the carby was one of the limiting factors on that motor. It had 92hp at the wheels, and (much later) I read that carby is probably only good for 125hp (flywheel) - so I probably wasn't far off.
If you're planning to keep the motor essentially stock, it may be sufficient. If you're looking to extract more horsepower, I would look for something a little larger.
The main difference between the stock carby (mikuni) and the weber is the mikuni has a vacuum operated secondary barrel and the weber is mechanical via linkage. The throttle sizes are nearly identical.
The mikuni is a good carby (32/35 on the 2.6 astron) but the secondary diaphragm always gets a hole in it from age and then stops working. This causes the 2.6 to get very breathless over about 3500 rpm as it is only working on the primary barrel and fuel jet. Replace the diaphragm and the power comes back (and fuel economy drops )
The weber is a good carby (32/36) also but you need to find some one who can "jet" the carby properly to give the engine the correct fuel mixture. Without a proper tune to get the correct jets in the carby on a dyno the carby won't see its full potential.
At the end of the day the weber can make more power but it will cost money to set up properly. A rebuilt mikuni (with new secondary diaphragm) will be less mucking around and cheaper.
REgards
epitrochoid
The mikuni is a good carby (32/35 on the 2.6 astron) but the secondary diaphragm always gets a hole in it from age and then stops working. This causes the 2.6 to get very breathless over about 3500 rpm as it is only working on the primary barrel and fuel jet. Replace the diaphragm and the power comes back (and fuel economy drops )
The weber is a good carby (32/36) also but you need to find some one who can "jet" the carby properly to give the engine the correct fuel mixture. Without a proper tune to get the correct jets in the carby on a dyno the carby won't see its full potential.
At the end of the day the weber can make more power but it will cost money to set up properly. A rebuilt mikuni (with new secondary diaphragm) will be less mucking around and cheaper.
REgards
epitrochoid
Yeah true a mikuni would be alot simpler, now i wonder which is the better of the 2 mikuni's the resin bodied one or the metal bodied one? i have a resin one and i think it is the culprit behind all my woes, can i use an older metal mikuni? i.e do they have the same water lines etc etc as the resin body carbs?
thanks
thanks
resined body? i thought they were all metal.Busta-P wrote:Yeah true a mikuni would be alot simpler, now i wonder which is the better of the 2 mikuni's the resin bodied one or the metal bodied one? i have a resin one and i think it is the culprit behind all my woes, can i use an older metal mikuni? i.e do they have the same water lines etc etc as the resin body carbs?
thanks
There was an article a while back in 4wdm in which they had a small part on how to get more grunt from the 2.6, they reccomened
-taking a bit off the head for more compression
-torqueir camshaft
-bore the internals out of the stock carby ( would that make it like a bigger carb??)
-extractors
then if you want more putting an efi setup off a magna into it.
Real men smoke clutches
86' Pajero
2" OME, steel bar goodness, MTZ's, Exxon Valdez-esk fuel consumption
86' Pajero
2" OME, steel bar goodness, MTZ's, Exxon Valdez-esk fuel consumption
LOL yeah there are 2 different types according to the Gregory's manual i happen to have the resin body one. i already have a good set of 4-2-1 extractors on it a camshaft might be something for another day (maybe if it blows up) at the moment i just want it to go up a hill without having to go back to second LOL (the mikuni is shagged)NCpaj wrote:resined body? i thought they were all metal.Busta-P wrote:Yeah true a mikuni would be alot simpler, now i wonder which is the better of the 2 mikuni's the resin bodied one or the metal bodied one? i have a resin one and i think it is the culprit behind all my woes, can i use an older metal mikuni? i.e do they have the same water lines etc etc as the resin body carbs?
thanks
There was an article a while back in 4wdm in which they had a small part on how to get more grunt from the 2.6, they reccomened
-taking a bit off the head for more compression
-torqueir camshaft
-bore the internals out of the stock carby ( would that make it like a bigger carb??)
-extractors
then if you want more putting an efi setup off a magna into it.
i actually bought a 34ADM today, i have previously built one of these so i think it will be the best option, i was just wondering if the 32/36 would work straight off the bat, oh well down to the local carby joint to buy some new jets. Just out of curiosity what jet sizes did you go for? i use 55 idle, 60 sec idle, 135 primary main and 180 sec main.PIGGY_PAJERO wrote:I just did a 34ADM weber conversion, and if my motor wasn't so stuffed, it would be great. There is improvment, but not a big difference because of the condition of my engine.
Still a good easy conversion though.
thanks
I think with a 32/36 it will depend what its off whether it'll work right straight off the bat, but the jet sizes you have will do fine, i have the same. Be careful with the air correctors though, i have had fun getting them right. I think mine a 145's?
I am chasing a cheap broken 2.6L pajero or sigma box, feel free to pm me if you have!!
did you use 145's for both? last time i bought one i didn't even change them LOL.PIGGY_PAJERO wrote:I think with a 32/36 it will depend what its off whether it'll work right straight off the bat, but the jet sizes you have will do fine, i have the same. Be careful with the air correctors though, i have had fun getting them right. I think mine a 145's?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests