Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user. If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
micka1 wrote:i think the back doors need to be a bit bigger and it would look better .
No point being any bigger as there is no where to go after that as the rear shock hoopes sit behind the rear seat and the rear seat bacj is in line with the profile.
Wheel base is out at 104" and won't be going any further.
micka1 wrote:i think the back doors need to be a bit bigger and it would look better .
No point being any bigger as there is no where to go after that as the rear shock hoopes sit behind the rear seat and the rear seat bacj is in line with the profile.
Wheel base is out at 104" and won't be going any further.
I think it'd look better with a longer rear door, wether pointless or not
i love the look of this and can't wait to see it completed. I've seen the odd one or two dual cab utes done from cut down troopy's and extended 40's but can't wait to see this done
i know it sounds crazy and NFI if theres room with a 3b i know there isnt with a 2f but if you moved the front 1/2 of the body forward by 100mm it would make the front wheels sit more centered in the guard and give the door a extra 100mm making it look better proportioned
pcman wrote:i know it sounds crazy and NFI if theres room with a 3b i know there isnt with a 2f but if you moved the front 1/2 of the body forward by 100mm it would make the front wheels sit more centered in the guard and give the door a extra 100mm making it look better proportioned
Visually it looks more like the rear axle wants to go back a touch. But I am not saying it would be worth the effort, what you're doing lookes fricking cool anyway.
Don't get me wrong I am just responding to the comment above, not being picky and nosey!
chimpboy wrote:Visually it looks more like the rear axle wants to go back a touch. But I am not saying it would be worth the effort, what you're doing lookes fricking cool anyway.
Don't get me wrong I am just responding to the comment above, not being picky and nosey!
I would not have posted it if I didn't want feedback. Good / Bad or stupid it all helps in getting where I want it to be, so thanks for your comments.
I agree in the pictures that the rear needs to go back further, in reality the flare sits a little further forward but it is still touch and go.
Once I have finished the inner pillars and foot well I will look at it and see if it needs to go back some more.
For now it will stay as the links are made and I said I wanted 104" wheel base and that is what I have.
chimpboy wrote:I can't see these images but I would like to!
ON the first pics I thought the door/ply looked far too short, but i think in this photo it is further back - may have been how you always planned but it didnt appear the same with the ply.
I think it looks as you have it in this pic, cant wait to see it finished.
*there's a rock, drive over it :) there's a bigger rock, drive over it :twisted: there's an even bigger rock, oops broke it :oops: Upgrade broken bit :bad-words:
Goto *