Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
Turbo comparison basics
Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators
Turbo comparison basics
Can anyone have a stab at what would be the result of this hypothetical please?
A fairly standard car of around 4L capacity fitted with a Garrett t25 bush turbo 0.60 intake, 0.86 exhaust ...this turbo has been compared to the disco potato by a few.
Then another near identical Garrett T25 bush turbo is fitted and nothing else is changed except the intake is now 0.80 and the exhaust is now 0.64.
I know there could be more to it but at a basic level what sort of car performance in comparison would the driver notice he is now driving?
All thoughts most welcome.
cheers
A fairly standard car of around 4L capacity fitted with a Garrett t25 bush turbo 0.60 intake, 0.86 exhaust ...this turbo has been compared to the disco potato by a few.
Then another near identical Garrett T25 bush turbo is fitted and nothing else is changed except the intake is now 0.80 and the exhaust is now 0.64.
I know there could be more to it but at a basic level what sort of car performance in comparison would the driver notice he is now driving?
All thoughts most welcome.
cheers
Last edited by fnqcairns on Sat Mar 13, 2010 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*JUST LUV IT* 96 GQ LWB TD4.2, Cav, Kings, Dobinsons, Motorguard, Enginesaver, 400 pro, Cooper ST's (rolls eyes), fleetguard oil filters, Delo 400 engine oil, Delo ESI gearbox oil and an RTC.
Yeah you are correct I will edit the post if it lets me, steep and slippery (obviously) learning curve lately.-Scott- wrote:I can't figure out how the inducer can be more than the exducer.
Are you sure you're not quoting intake & exhaust A/R ratios?
Last edited by fnqcairns on Sat Mar 13, 2010 11:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*JUST LUV IT* 96 GQ LWB TD4.2, Cav, Kings, Dobinsons, Motorguard, Enginesaver, 400 pro, Cooper ST's (rolls eyes), fleetguard oil filters, Delo 400 engine oil, Delo ESI gearbox oil and an RTC.
yeah I to can sort of get my head around the exhaust side, but when different sized intakes are added to the equation it all goes to pot!-Scott- wrote:If you're talking about A/R ratios, I would expect the change in exhaust A/R ratios to generate boost at lower rpm (the turbo will spin up faster), but the engine could run out of puff (become "strangled") at lower rpm too.
I can't get my head around intake A/Rs. I'll watch this with interest.
Been searching everywhere for a basic explanation but have got nowhere.
With hope the good people here will have the knowledge needed.
cheers
*JUST LUV IT* 96 GQ LWB TD4.2, Cav, Kings, Dobinsons, Motorguard, Enginesaver, 400 pro, Cooper ST's (rolls eyes), fleetguard oil filters, Delo 400 engine oil, Delo ESI gearbox oil and an RTC.
the second turbo will come on boost earlier because the smaller exh housing forces higher gas velocity. The larger intake will allow the turbo to flow more air, therefore the second turbo has a higher HP potential.
The really critical thing is what size wheels and their trim are fitted.
on a diesel, go the smaller exh housing because they don't rev high enough to really get the turbo spooled up.
example of this is:
My SR20DET silvia runs a GT3071R with a .86 exhaust housing. doesn't come onto full boost (20psi) until just over 3500rpm
Same turbo with smaller .64 housing and the car was on full boost by 2000rpm. Made slightly less power as the turbo restricted gas flow at higher rpm. Need to change to an external wastegate to solve that.
On a TD42, you want it on boost as early as possible otherwise you run out of revs before you run out of turbo.
The really critical thing is what size wheels and their trim are fitted.
on a diesel, go the smaller exh housing because they don't rev high enough to really get the turbo spooled up.
example of this is:
My SR20DET silvia runs a GT3071R with a .86 exhaust housing. doesn't come onto full boost (20psi) until just over 3500rpm
Same turbo with smaller .64 housing and the car was on full boost by 2000rpm. Made slightly less power as the turbo restricted gas flow at higher rpm. Need to change to an external wastegate to solve that.
On a TD42, you want it on boost as early as possible otherwise you run out of revs before you run out of turbo.
Beaut Utes and 4x4's - Driving your dollar further off road
Call Matt - 0411 563 300
[url]beautute.com.au[/url]
lockers, tyres, tube bar work, ute chops
Call Matt - 0411 563 300
[url]beautute.com.au[/url]
lockers, tyres, tube bar work, ute chops
Does the smaller exhaust A/R create higher back pressure at higher revs? Wouldn't this work against peak power?anzac wrote:the second turbo will come on boost earlier because the smaller exh housing forces higher gas velocity. The larger intake will allow the turbo to flow more air, therefore the second turbo has a higher HP potential.
yes, hence . . .-Scott- wrote:Does the smaller exhaust A/R create higher back pressure at higher revs? Wouldn't this work against peak power?anzac wrote:the second turbo will come on boost earlier because the smaller exh housing forces higher gas velocity. The larger intake will allow the turbo to flow more air, therefore the second turbo has a higher HP potential.
anzac wrote:Same turbo with smaller .64 housing and the car was on full boost by 2000rpm. Made slightly less power as the turbo restricted gas flow at higher rpm.
Different intake A/R's are used to modify the compressor map. Usually you don't get a choice as the compressor housing A/R is matched to the wheel.fnqcairns wrote: yeah I to can sort of get my head around the exhaust side, but when different sized intakes are added to the equation it all goes to pot!
Been searching everywhere for a basic explanation but have got nowhere.
With hope the good people here will have the knowledge needed.
cheers
Yes. In his example, he was only modifying the exhaust housing, and made no mention of modifying the intake.80's_delirious wrote:yes, hence . . .-Scott- wrote:Does the smaller exhaust A/R create higher back pressure at higher revs? Wouldn't this work against peak power?anzac wrote:the second turbo will come on boost earlier because the smaller exh housing forces higher gas velocity. The larger intake will allow the turbo to flow more air, therefore the second turbo has a higher HP potential.
anzac wrote:Same turbo with smaller .64 housing and the car was on full boost by 2000rpm. Made slightly less power as the turbo restricted gas flow at higher rpm.
So the change mentioned in the OP could increase the top end through modifying the intake housing, but decrease the top end by restricting the exhaust. I'm wondering what would be the nett result? Will the free flowing intake provide sufficient benefits to overcome the restrictive exhaust?
Is this where it starts coming down to all the other factors in the setup, and you can't really generalise?-Scott- wrote:So the change mentioned in the OP could increase the top end through modifying the intake housing, but decrease the top end by restricting the exhaust. I'm wondering what would be the nett result? Will the free flowing intake provide sufficient benefits to overcome the restrictive exhaust?
This is not legal advice.
Probably. I expect this is where you need to start looking at compressor maps. But, since I've never seen one, I'll bow out here.chimpboy wrote:Is this where it starts coming down to all the other factors in the setup, and you can't really generalise?-Scott- wrote:So the change mentioned in the OP could increase the top end through modifying the intake housing, but decrease the top end by restricting the exhaust. I'm wondering what would be the nett result? Will the free flowing intake provide sufficient benefits to overcome the restrictive exhaust?
Changing A/R has more affect with the turbine housing, and much less with the compressor.
With the compressor most change is produced by changing the trim or impeller diameter (or both).
In general, when comparing compressor maps: inducer diameter has biggest influence on flow, exducer has biggest influence on boost pressure, smaller trim gives better efficiency. Compressor Trim = inducer^2/exducer^2 x 100
This is why for particular sizes (T25 in this case) you can have different A/R turbine housings (but not usually for compressor) and different size impellers and trim for compressors.
With the compressor most change is produced by changing the trim or impeller diameter (or both).
In general, when comparing compressor maps: inducer diameter has biggest influence on flow, exducer has biggest influence on boost pressure, smaller trim gives better efficiency. Compressor Trim = inducer^2/exducer^2 x 100
This is why for particular sizes (T25 in this case) you can have different A/R turbine housings (but not usually for compressor) and different size impellers and trim for compressors.
John
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests