Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Are regular clutches really that bad?

Tech Talk for Nissan owners.

Moderators: toaddog, V8Patrol

Post Reply
Posts: 3552
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 9:46 pm
Location: Ormond VIC

Are regular clutches really that bad?

Post by muppet_man67 »

I need to buy a new clutch for a GQ Patrol. It has done around 300,000kms on what I presume is the factory clutch.

I have been quoted on a PBR clutch and a heavy duty of which I cannot remember the name. I'm told the PBR has a higher load rating then its OME counterpart.

So I guess my question is, has anyone out there ever replaced their clutch with non-heavy duty and regretted it down the track. ie, within a few years of replacing it?
I can't see myself ever running anything bigger then 33"s and I don't do any heavy towing.
Cheers Sam.
[url]http://www.vic.suzuki4wd.com/forum[/url]
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 8:25 pm
Location: gold coast

Re: Are regular clutches really that bad?

Post by mavzilla »

I run standard clutch on 33s in a gq diesel non turbo, never had any problem and im not kind to it. Holds fine under full noise low range and have slid wheels in high range 2 wheel drive.
wish list (lockers,lift,endless air,winch,bar,spotties,35s,paint job,turbo,18yrs old hottie
Posts: 1383
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: Newcastle

Re: Are regular clutches really that bad?

Post by oldmate »

I've only every used standard clutches. There's no point to a heavy duty clutch with a standard engine. If you're going through clutches prematurely then you are doing something wrong.
The worst part about being told you have Alzheimer's, is that it doesn't just happen once.
Posts: 1040
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: yatala, halfway between brisbane and GC

Re: Are regular clutches really that bad?

Post by love ke70 »

mine is presumed a standard, i make roughly 100rwkw, on 35s, and just last week my ute was weighing in at probably 6 tonne with the trailer i had on plus what i had on the back, and i had to slip the clutch to get the bastard up and moving and it still didnt over heat or have any dramas.

but as i said, presumed standard, no record of it being changed, but i bought my ute with absolutely no history provided...
97 GQ patrol coilcab. TD42, safari turbo kit with fiddled turbo, D-GAS kit. dyno results to come...
4inch lift, king springs, efs and procomp shocks
315/70R16 cooper ST's
found fuel economy...
Posts: 2877
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:46 pm
Location: Goodna QLD

Re: Are regular clutches really that bad?

Post by ludacris »

I am running a $310 10% more clamping pressure than standard clutch in my turbo GQ motor in my GU and have done over 20 000km,s to the cape and back towing with no problems at all. I guess time will tell.

Cris
Cris's 4 X 4 Accessories & Suspension 0404 736 325 Rock Sliders From $499
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Bribie Island

Re: Are regular clutches really that bad?

Post by sidewayz »

im running a sefari tuff clutch in my turbo td42 gq. for the little bit extra in price i would rather have something a lot heavier duty. specially when ya offroad with bigger tires.

gq/gu being hydrulic clutch, even when u put a heavier clutch in, the pedal isnt that heavy. if anthing it has a better feel. IMO
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Muswellbrook, NSW.

Re: Are regular clutches really that bad?

Post by nicksamaniac »

i have a GQ with 33's on it, its a turbo RB30, i have read about people who say they keep going through clutches on this model.
and i give mine heaps, its still the standard cluch with 230,000kms on it, and it seems to feel fine and has never sliped.
as oldmate said, they should last.
unless your doing 6500rpm launches at the lights on 37's, the standard should be fine.
just weigh up the price, if heavy duty is only a bit more in price than the stock one, and it will clamp a few 100kg more? i'd buy heavy duty.
but if the wife is the regular driver, just go the stock.
91 GQ lwb, 6"lift, 35's, RB30DET twin cam head efi turbo.
98 Nissan s1 stagea rb25det manual, sleeper family wagon!
Posts: 1383
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: Newcastle

Re: Are regular clutches really that bad?

Post by oldmate »

The new 3 litre gu utes are probably the exception. I have heard of people going through clutches when loaded up (and they are rated at 3.5 tonne). but that's poor design in my opinion. Too high gearing, not enough low end torque combined with turbo lag.

If i were in that situation i'd be looking at regearing the diffs, opposed to fitting a hd clutch.
The worst part about being told you have Alzheimer's, is that it doesn't just happen once.
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Re: Are regular clutches really that bad?

Post by Guy »

muppet_man67 wrote:I need to buy a new clutch for a GQ Patrol. It has done around 300,000kms on what I presume is the factory clutch.

I have been quoted on a PBR clutch and a heavy duty of which I cannot remember the name. I'm told the PBR has a higher load rating then its OME counterpart.

So I guess my question is, has anyone out there ever replaced their clutch with non-heavy duty and regretted it down the track. ie, within a few years of replacing it?
I can't see myself ever running anything bigger then 33"s and I don't do any heavy towing.
Cheers Sam.
s
Standard replacement vs factory is not the same, Factory stuff is usually very very good. "Standard" replacement part unless ex fcatory will rarely measure up ..

I would go for a decent brand name slightly heavier unit and call it good .. you dont need to drop the $$ on the super duty gear.
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests