Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Stock Sierra Suspension

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Forum rules
Post Reply
Posts: 3269
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:11 pm
Location: melting gears

Stock Sierra Suspension

Post by greg »

I just had a question from a Vehicle Engineer (VASS) about my car.

He wanted to know how much more suspension lift my car had over a standard sierra.

Apparently the rules in Victoria are that you can lift the car by no more than one third of the original suspension lift of the car before you need to get the car engineered.

Does anyone know what suspension a lift Stock Sierra had? i.e. perhaps what was the distance from the bump stop to the springs at ride height? (it think that is how it is determined?)...

Thanks.
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
Top
Posts: 3269
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:11 pm
Location: melting gears

Post by greg »

Here's the sort of thing i'm talking about...

From this site:

http://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/vrne/vrn ... ment&Area=[Road+safety+hidden+documents]


Quote:
A vehicle may be lowered or raised provided the clearance between a suspension component and it's associated bump stop is not altered by more than 1/3 of that specified by the manufacturer. In addition, the normal relationship between the front and rear suspension heights must not be unduly affected.
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
Top
Posts: 3825
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 8:42 pm
Location: in the sky , its a bird , its a plane ! No its super MOOSE !!!

Post by moose »

about this much .....
here









to









here !!!!



:D :armsup: :D
MissForbyNoob wrote:
and one day i'll just become a worthless housewife.
Top
Posts: 3269
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:11 pm
Location: melting gears

Post by greg »

What resolution should i have my 17" monitor at at to get an accurate measurement moose?
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
Top
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

1600x1200 ..
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Top
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

I'll measure up for you tonight when I get home.
But I would imagine that my springs are a bit sagged especially at the front.
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Top
Posts: 3269
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:11 pm
Location: melting gears

Post by greg »

DeWsE wrote:I'll measure up for you tonight when I get home.
But I would imagine that my springs are a bit sagged especially at the front.


Thanks dewse...

If it's not too much hassle - perhaps you could jack the car up a tad so that the shackle is verticle-ish (or the springs are at least flat rather than inverted) - that would kind of simulate the springs when they were new i reckon.
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
Top
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

Wellt the front ones are close to flat and the rear have a tad bit of arch. they have been reset before so they should be pretty close.

No hassle ;)
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Top
Posts: 2817
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 10:10 pm
Location: Hellbourne again

Post by bigsteve »

I thought you springs were pretty much flat now anyway Gerg??
yeshemesh
Top
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

Well the front is:

170mm from the top of the spring to the end point of the rubber bump stop.

The rear

230mm from the top of the spring to the metal plate that limits the bump stop.

Also I measured the distance between the end of the bump stop and where it contacts. The front was 90mm and the rear 110mm

greg wrote:It's hard work being a car guru


I know what you mean :cool:
Last edited by DeWsE on Thu May 13, 2004 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Top
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2002 9:03 am
Location: Blue Mountains, Sydney

Post by stephen »

I don't think that is standard suspension :shock: :shock:
Top
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

stephen wrote:
I don't think that is standard suspension


Well they have been reset before but they are still the the stoch springs. They were reset over a year ago so I would assume they have sagged.
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Top
Posts: 3269
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:11 pm
Location: melting gears

Post by greg »

Cheers Dewse. :)
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
Top
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

DeWsE wrote:Well the front is:

1700mm from the top of the spring to the end point of the rubber bump stop.

The rear

2300mm from the top of the spring to the metal plate that limits the bump stop.

Also I measured the distance between the end of the bump stop and where it contacts. The front was 900mm and the rear 1100mm

greg wrote:It's hard work being a car guru


I know what you mean :cool:


i think u added to many zeros ;)
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Top
Posts: 3269
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:11 pm
Location: melting gears

Post by greg »

redzook wrote:
DeWsE wrote:Well the front is:

1700mm from the top of the spring to the end point of the rubber bump stop.

The rear

2300mm from the top of the spring to the metal plate that limits the bump stop.

Also I measured the distance between the end of the bump stop and where it contacts. The front was 900mm and the rear 1100mm

greg wrote:It's hard work being a car guru


I know what you mean :cool:


i think u added to many zeros ;)


Perhaps he was measuring how heigh up your car sits ;)
DMA Founding Member #1 - Now Retired
Top
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

look where he measured from top of springs to bump stops
i havent got lifted springs so mine would be prolly lower :roll:
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Top
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

redzook wrote:
DeWsE wrote:Well the front is:

1700mm from the top of the spring to the end point of the rubber bump stop.

The rear

2300mm from the top of the spring to the metal plate that limits the bump stop.

Also I measured the distance between the end of the bump stop and where it contacts. The front was 900mm and the rear 1100mm

greg wrote:It's hard work being a car guru


I know what you mean :cool:


i think u added to many zeros ;)


Your right redzook I was to excited and added to many "0".
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Suzuki”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests