Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Suspension tech...

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Suspension tech...

Post by DeWsE »

Well I made this post in my build up thread but didn't get any comments. So either that thread is lamo and not worth reading, or nobody acturally knows tech and finally nobody gives a crap about my POS.

Anyway have a read....
Well worked on the zook the other day. I have put the two helpers back in the rear so now it is a stock OME medium spring. The rear is now working great, getting heaps more power to the ground. the front on the other hand is still pretty loose, but I can most probably deal with that.

Now for another problem. I have installed the front shoks vertical to the diff, not realising how far the front diff will move back. So the front shocks now have a bit of denting. oops. I still have to move the hangers back though, so this might help with the direction of movement. (bigsteve can you measure how far farward yours are?)

Just a question, how does the diff move backwards in a reverse shackle setup. Why I ask is because the front drive shaft is designed to extend forward on the slip yoke but not backwards. I'm thinking if I add a spacer then the diff shouldn't be able to go backwards as at tgis tage I have over an inch constantly extended. Any idea's?
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Posts: 4583
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Wheeling in my backyard

Post by sierrajim »

big steve isn't running shackle reversal is he?
[quote="Harb"]Well I'm guessing that they didn't think everyone would carry on like a big bunch of sooky girls over it like they have........[/quote]
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

vitarajim wrote:big steve isn't running shackle reversal is he?


Nope but what I am trying to figure out is if I can reduce the amout the diff moves back. I want it to pust forwards into the opstical so i can gain more traction.

It seems as though I haven't asked the rigt questions and also the only way I will know is if I just play with it. ;)
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Posts: 2817
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 10:10 pm
Location: Hellbourne again

Post by bigsteve »

I can't comment on a SR as I have not run one.

I think what you are saying is that when the suspension tucks/droops and the diff moves forward & backward the shock is making contact with something??? What is it contacting with?

I think we need a pic from the side looking into your wheel arch with the tyre off.

ALSO

It seems that given the issues you had with the front wanting to invert (did you actually invert a shackle/s??) you want to try a fixed mount at the front (SR) to combat this.

Am I on track, its Tuesday and it still feels like Monday?
yeshemesh
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

I'm confusing myself I think.

The shock is hitting the u clamps on the diff.

What I want to active is the diff stays approx the same position on droop and the compressed side moves foward.

Look just ignore this thread and I'll just test a few things then come back with a write up.
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Posts: 2817
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 10:10 pm
Location: Hellbourne again

Post by bigsteve »

Sounds like the upper mounts are a touch too far forward.
yeshemesh
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

bigsteve wrote:Sounds like the upper mounts are a touch too far forward.


haha cool I like sherades (sp?)
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

DeWsE wrote:I'm confusing myself I think.

What I want to active is the diff stays approx the same position on droop and the compressed side moves foward.



nope you're confusing me too :crazyeyes:
Ransom note = demand + collage
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

DeWsE wrote:I'm confusing myself I think.

The shock is hitting the u clamps on the diff.

What I want to active is the diff stays approx the same position on droop and the compressed side moves foward.

Look just ignore this thread and I'll just test a few things then come back with a write up.


the diff will normally go towards the the shackle on compression and away at droop

so a SR will head back on compression normally. causes rubbage at the fire wall thats why most SR's move the diff a fair way forward. it will also droop forward

a standard shackle arrange ment willl do the opposite

but not all work like this

my zuk the springs are flat so the diff moves rear ward under compression and droop
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

Alright now that the phones have slowed down I'll try explain what i'm after again.

First of all I have looked at SR and I don't think it would suit my needs so i'm not going that way.

What I want to know is that when a drive shaft is closed on the slip yoke does that mean it will not allow both ends of the diff to move rearwards when approaching something with both wheels?
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

DeWsE wrote:Alright now that the phones have slowed down I'll try explain what i'm after again.

First of all I have looked at SR and I don't think it would suit my needs so i'm not going that way.

What I want to know is that when a drive shaft is closed on the slip yoke does that mean it will not allow both ends of the diff to move rearwards when approaching something with both wheels?


WTF

ur drive shaft should be able to move forwards and backwards

if i read that right u r tryin to use your drive shaft to stop the front diff movin back?

id say it would punch straight into your tcase or bust ya mounts on the tcase
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

redzook wrote:
DeWsE wrote:Alright now that the phones have slowed down I'll try explain what i'm after again.

First of all I have looked at SR and I don't think it would suit my needs so i'm not going that way.

What I want to know is that when a drive shaft is closed on the slip yoke does that mean it will not allow both ends of the diff to move rearwards when approaching something with both wheels?


WTF

ur drive shaft should be able to move forwards and backwards

if i read that right u r tryin to use your drive shaft to stop the front diff movin back?

id say it would punch straight into your tcase or bust ya mounts on the tcase


Thanks redzook I understand it now! Your right that wouldn't really help would it :?
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Posts: 2817
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 10:10 pm
Location: Hellbourne again

Post by bigsteve »

Dude,

Put me down for 3 of whatever you were taking/smokin at work today :finger:
yeshemesh
Posts: 1676
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:26 am
Location: brisbane

Post by 1MadEngineer »

So who here has actually done a shackle reversal?
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

bigsteve wrote:Dude,

Put me down for 3 of whatever you were taking/smokin at work today :finger:


I was all over the place yesterday, had a good sleep though last night so I should be back on track. ;)
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 1:37 pm
Location: New Zealand home of the warriors

Post by Luigi Malone »

1MadEngineer wrote:So who here has actually done a shackle reversal?


Me, I haven't.

Nah JJ. A friend recently bought a Sierra 410 with a SR, and he couldn't take it off quick enough. On road habits were just tooooo exciting.

I would love to hear from somebody who has done it also. Must be wheeled and road driven to be any use to me.
LM
It's better to have LIVED for a day than to have EXISTED for a hundred years.
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

Luigi Malone wrote:
1MadEngineer wrote:So who here has actually done a shackle reversal?


Me, I haven't.

Nah JJ. A friend recently bought a Sierra 410 with a SR, and he couldn't take it off quick enough. On road habits were just tooooo exciting.

I would love to hear from somebody who has done it also. Must be wheeled and road driven to be any use to me.
LM


Sam (overkill) and Tim (redzook) have both done it at same stage or another.
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 1:37 pm
Location: New Zealand home of the warriors

Post by Luigi Malone »

Thanks Dewse.
Sam and Tim, was it worth it? Do you still run it, and if not why not.?
TIA.
LM
It's better to have LIVED for a day than to have EXISTED for a hundred years.
Posts: 1676
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:26 am
Location: brisbane

Post by 1MadEngineer »

I have done SR on a few Zuks and they rode and handled great, woulndn't have it any other way.
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

Luigi Malone wrote:Thanks Dewse.
Sam and Tim, was it worth it? Do you still run it, and if not why not.?
TIA.
LM


Sam ran it on his first two rigs now he has coils. Tim was gonna set it up on his new rig.....so I think they like it. Main reason being is that it improves approach angle. They were both S/O and had put the spring perches in a location so that they didn't require a drop down spring hanger at the front. (like the calmini one). Redzook suggested to me that I could use shims on the spring perch to achieve the right pinion angle.
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

DeWsE wrote:
Luigi Malone wrote:Thanks Dewse.
Sam and Tim, was it worth it? Do you still run it, and if not why not.?
TIA.
LM


Sam ran it on his first two rigs now he has coils. Tim was gonna set it up on his new rig.....so I think they like it. Main reason being is that it improves approach angle. They were both S/O and had put the spring perches in a location so that they didn't require a drop down spring hanger at the front. (like the calmini one). Redzook suggested to me that I could use shims on the spring perch to achieve the right pinion angle.


ive neva had a shackle reverse ;)

but will have one eventually
Posts: 3722
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 7:32 pm
Location: perth wa

Post by bazooked »

just coil it and lock it and u wont have any probs :finger:
Posts: 286
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 11:47 pm
Location: ex perth now south of brissy

Post by Drew »

have you looked at the calmini fitted ?.It moves the diff forward, with 33s the approach is better than you think + no inverted springs.
I just measured it, stock 130 mm from chassis to the bottom of the spring,calmini 155mm from chassis to the bottom of the spring.don't believe what is written by someone selling other parts.if you look at the other buildups with s'r you'll notice the box section welded to the chassis then the spring eye mount welded to the bottom of that.
Your welcome to have a look i have 3 zuks in the build at the moment all with different setups so im not biased just because i have a zuk with the calmini s/r .Come for a run to mundaring next weekend you can't do much more damage ;)
Posts: 2296
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 4:30 pm

Post by OVERKILL ENG »

1MadEngineer wrote:So who here has actually done a shackle reversal?



Me me me

I had a shackle reversal on my first Zook and it was awsum made climbing ledges easier gave me a better approach angle I could ram the mounts into the rocks without the risk of bending the shackles.
On road it drove better. The caster has to be reset when doing a SR I think this is why they get such a bagging for road use cause people do the reversal without doing the caster and then they do drive badly.
SAM
OVERKILL ENGINEERING
www.overkill4x4.com
Posts: 2296
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 4:30 pm

Post by OVERKILL ENG »

Luigi Malone wrote:Thanks Dewse.
Sam and Tim, was it worth it? Do you still run it, and if not why not.?
TIA.
LM


Yes I run coils now only because we wanted to make a kit. Yes the coils are a smoother ride and has more travel than most leaf setups and is easier to stretch the wheelbase slightly.
If I was to have another leafy I would definately do a shackle reversal.
SAM
OVERKILL ENGINEERING
www.overkill4x4.com
Posts: 1676
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:26 am
Location: brisbane

Post by 1MadEngineer »

sam, of course i know you have :lol:
and it is good to hear from people who have actually done this conversion.
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 1:37 pm
Location: New Zealand home of the warriors

Post by Luigi Malone »

[quote="Yes I run coils now only because we wanted to make a kit. Yes the coils are a smoother ride and has more travel than most leaf setups and is easier to stretch the wheelbase slightly.
If I was to have another leafy I would definately do a shackle reversal.
SAM[/quote]

Sam, can you either explain to this pleb the best way to SR, or point me to where I can glean the info from one as learned as yourself?
A thousand camels to you effendi.
LM.
It's better to have LIVED for a day than to have EXISTED for a hundred years.
Posts: 3825
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 8:42 pm
Location: in the sky , its a bird , its a plane ! No its super MOOSE !!!

Post by moose »

did SR on mine about 3 years ago !!
wouldn,t go back to conventional zook set-up !!

the ride quality "kicks @rse" over standard leaf !!
as SAM said , great for hitting & climbing ledges !!
did some 1 say "APPROACH ANGLE" !!! :D

now , with the looonger springs , the ride is even better again !!

but as stated , move your diff forward of the original position !!
I,m running 33,s & get no firewall rubbage !!! :cool:
MissForbyNoob wrote:
and one day i'll just become a worthless housewife.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests