Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Borg Warner 3Speed in 77 rangey

Tech Talk for Rover owners.

Moderator: Micka

Post Reply
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 10:22 pm
Location: Stanthorpe- QLD

Borg Warner 3Speed in 77 rangey

Post by Snarba »

hi there my rangey has been modified to auto using a b/w 3speed. Are these boxes OK ratio-wise or do they sap alot of torque in comparison to the stock rangey auto box? thanx.....
I've got a WEAPON OF MOSS DETRUCTION
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

From what I have seen the BW boxes work well and sap a lot less power than the torquflite. However if you have the usual conversion you also have most of an LT95 under your rangie as well.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 10:22 pm
Location: Stanthorpe- QLD

Post by Snarba »

pardon my ignorance but what does that mean? ( the rest being LT95 )
I've got a WEAPON OF MOSS DETRUCTION
Posts: 640
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 4:04 pm
Location: Snake Valley VIC

Post by Aquarangie »

Snarb,

This is covered in the 'sticky' tech info thread and pretty much explains what you are asking :D

Trav
Land Rover- The Collingwood of 4WD's!!!!
Posts: 2298
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:26 pm
Location: nsw maitland

Post by cooter »

a borg warner 40 is stronger if they can be modified to fit and it just so happens i have a fully rebuilt box to taxi spec (from an xf falcon which is stronger again biger clutches and bands etc if u r interested
http://www.4wdaction.com.au/shed/index.php?id=1097&im=1
[quote="squik"]He He... every time I turn off my protection my box gets slammed with spam....
[/quote]
Posts: 2298
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:26 pm
Location: nsw maitland

Post by cooter »

a borg warner 40 is stronger if they can be modified to fit and it just so happens i have a fully rebuilt box to taxi spec (from an xf falcon which is stronger again biger clutches and bands etc if u r interested
http://www.4wdaction.com.au/shed/index.php?id=1097&im=1
[quote="squik"]He He... every time I turn off my protection my box gets slammed with spam....
[/quote]
Posts: 3064
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Yinnar South, Vic

Post by cloughy »

They are not a transmission that will take abuse well nor have a go d life span.the are the same tranny as in early falcons with six cylinders not v8's borg warner 35 then 40 in the xe-xf also fitted to datsun bluebirds would be fine for regular driving but loaded on a hill?not so good. are you sure it's not an early ritter conversion using a what's commonly known as a c4 but most likely a c9 although almost identical transmission. if so they are a much more durable box as there whats fitted to v8 falcons of similar era.ratio wise they are fine until large tyres are fitted 33 35 etc and probably won't take the extra strain to well either
Wanted: Car trailer or beaver tail truck, let me know what you got
Posts: 1048
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 9:48 am
Location: Waikerie; SA

Post by Eddy »

I had an XR falcon with the bw35 behind a 289 V8. Did a bit of towing etc and had a good run.
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 5:51 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by closet1092004 »

The Borg-Warner conversion was done by Mike Norman at Off Road Automatics in Sydney under licence to Jaguar Rover Australia. As I recall they felt it was fine for the 3.5 V8 but not much more. The C4 was thought to be good up to 5 litres without problems

John
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests