Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Runng Paj in permanent 4h mode

Tech Talk for Mitsubishi owners.

Moderator: -Scott-

Post Reply
Posts: 400
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Braidwood , NSW

Runng Paj in permanent 4h mode

Post by Ian Sharpe »

Hi guys,

I had a drive of my mates Toy just recently & was impressed by its road holding ability & handling. Its full time 4wd.

I can get the same effect by running my super select in 4h mode but wondered what would be the longer term problems from this if any.

More fuel useage, more front tire wear, more front end wear?? what do you guys reckon. I thought maybe not a bad idea since I dont use my Paj as a daily driver now.

cheers
Posts: 365
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 1:38 pm
Location: Brisbane, Nthsider

Post by redrocket »

What advantages to you forsee in doing this other than added traction in "low" traction conditions? Would this minor advantage weigh up against the disadvantage of increased wear and fuel usage?
"If it ain't broken, smash it harder, then make it stronger!"
Posts: 400
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Braidwood , NSW

Post by Ian Sharpe »

Well as I said I reckon that having the fron t wheels driving in 4h gives much better road holding & handling even in high traction conditions.
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 7:56 pm

Post by pajpwr »

Ian Sharpe wrote:Well as I said I reckon that having the fron t wheels driving in 4h gives much better road holding & handling even in high traction conditions.


Agreed, which is why I won't run a front locker. Arguably, there is reduced stress all round as 50% torque (or so) goes to the front.

I'd like to see how much less fuel is used. I doubt it would be significant.

My usage is 2WD, but as soon as I drive on wet roads, or dirt, or at high speed, I move into 4H unlocked.
--
Robert
Life is better in low range
Posts: 365
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 1:38 pm
Location: Brisbane, Nthsider

Post by redrocket »

pajpwr wrote:
My usage is 2WD, but as soon as I drive on wet roads, or dirt, or at high speed, I move into 4H unlocked.


I personally prefer the drift style of driving i get when in 2h on dirt roads, especially with my right foot booted against the firewall. :finger:
"If it ain't broken, smash it harder, then make it stronger!"
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:50 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Bitsamissin »

True Ian, that in 4H (centre diff unlocked) that the handling is way better specially on twisty mountain roads.
I only ever used this function once or twice to see the difference.
Having manual hubs and a front auto-locker I have lost this function now but it doesn't bother me at all.
I would say you would use more fuel maybe 5% or so running in this mode permanently. When I fitted manual hubs I noticed better fuel economy when I had the 31"s.
Also the design of the t/case provides just enough slippage to prevent wind up when in 4H but I really don't know the long term effects of driving permanently in this mode. There will certainly be more wear and tear but to what extent ?? CV's, front diff, t/case centre diff and viscous coupling would all be working full time.
I personally wouldn't do it because I think it's not designed that way only for the odd occassion when extra traction is required. There is also the issue of speed and some were concerned about the ability to drive over 100km/h in this mode, it was a big topic on Trail Talk some time back.
My personal opinion is that you may end up cooking the viscous coupling and possibly the centre diff.
Posts: 400
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Braidwood , NSW

Post by Ian Sharpe »

good points Frank,
BTW any new from ARB re front locker, I had an email some time back from Greg saying "soon there will be an announcment"

Have you had any further contact??

cheers
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 12:12 pm
Location: Brisbane southside

re

Post by Grantw »

Sooooonnnnn.....
09 Mitsu Evo X Mr
09 Suzuki Swift
09 VW 190kw Tiguan
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:50 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Bitsamissin »

No Ian haven't heard anything more.
Through a contact I did hear that the engineer who was working on this project resigned and left a few weeks ago. This may set things back a bit ??
The other engineer (who I know reads this forum) will be snowed under coz of this but I believe he is a breathtakingly gifted locker engineer and no doubt will come through with the goods !!!
Do you think that was a good crawl job :roll:
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 7:56 pm

Post by pajpwr »

Does the Paj have a centre diff, or a viscous coupling? Why would it need both?
--
Robert
Life is better in low range
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:50 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Bitsamissin »

Rob, it has both I'll post some pics tomorrow of them.
Centre diff for drive without t/case wind up and the viscous coupling for the 50:50 torque split.
I just luv my "clacker Jabber"
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:50 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Bitsamissin »

OK here is a pic of the super select centre diff (left) and the viscous coupling (right).

Image
I just luv my "clacker Jabber"
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 7:56 pm

Post by pajpwr »

Thanks Frank. So a pure centre diff wouldn't be 50/50? I expect the VC would also need to be locked or bypassed too, then?

That must mean most constant 4WD vehicles have a VC as well as a C/D.

I never knew that, and I know one mechanic that doesn't either, because I asked and he couldn't explain!
--
Robert
Life is better in low range
Posts: 2739
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:50 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Bitsamissin »

Yes I'm sure they do.
When you lock the centre diff the VC is also locked out.
I think how it works is that you have a nominal amount of drive to the front but if the rear starts to loose traction the VC starts to lock up towards that 50:50 torque distribution.
The Gen 3 has a 33:67 torque distribution capability which further limits power loss through wheelspin.
I just luv my "clacker Jabber"
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests