Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
Ashcroft versus MD Crawler
Moderator: Micka
Ashcroft versus MD Crawler
Do the ashcroft and MD crawler offer the same low range?
I know MD lowers the 1st low by 30% the Ascroft state on their webiste that they do lower it by 80%....I doubt they are comparing apples to apples here
Has anyone purchased the Aschroft transmission
Jay
I know MD lowers the 1st low by 30% the Ascroft state on their webiste that they do lower it by 80%....I doubt they are comparing apples to apples here
Has anyone purchased the Aschroft transmission
Jay
96 Disco Gamel Trophy 36"*12.5 ET'II's, F&R ARB's,4.75 R&P GBR,GBR F&R
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
2 different set ups.
maxi have 30 and 40 % lower.
Ashcroft have the 80% and a bolt reduction unit 1500.00 pounds.
Michael.
maxi have 30 and 40 % lower.
Ashcroft have the 80% and a bolt reduction unit 1500.00 pounds.
Michael.
Mitsubishi 2010 NT DID Pajero wagon, Factory rear diff lock, Dual batteries, ARB bar, winch, Mt ATZ 4 rib tyres.
1986 RR.
Custom suspension links etc.
HSV 215 engine.
4.3 diffs.
1986 RR.
Custom suspension links etc.
HSV 215 engine.
4.3 diffs.
I tought ashcroft is running for 650 pounds(1163 $ US) as listed in the siteHSV Rangie wrote:2 different set ups.
maxi have 30 and 40 % lower.
Ashcroft have the 80% and a bolt reduction unit 1500.00 pounds.
Michael.
How much is the MD crawler running for?
96 Disco Gamel Trophy 36"*12.5 ET'II's, F&R ARB's,4.75 R&P GBR,GBR F&R
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
You need to use the correct terminology to avoid confusion -Jay wrote:I tought ashcroft is running for 650 pounds(1163 $ US) as listed in the siteHSV Rangie wrote:2 different set ups.
maxi have 30 and 40 % lower.
Ashcroft have the 80% and a bolt reduction unit 1500.00 pounds.
Michael.
How much is the MD crawler running for?
Crawler GEARS or lower low range GEARS
or
Crawler BOX
They are 2 completely different things - the gears replace your existing one, the BOX is a bolt in selectable box - most peopleuse the word "crawler" when talking about the crawler box, not the gears.
MD 30% is about AUD$1700 don't know about the 40% - probably the same or a bit more. The advantage of the MD setup is you can use whatever high renge ratio you want.
As you said the ashcroft GEARS are 650GBP, the BOX is 1500GBP. AFAIK you can only run 1.2:1 high range with the Ashcroft setup.
The advantage of a crawler box is you keep your existing low range as well.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
BenISUZUROVER wrote:You need to use the correct terminology to avoid confusion -Jay wrote:I tought ashcroft is running for 650 pounds(1163 $ US) as listed in the siteHSV Rangie wrote:2 different set ups.
maxi have 30 and 40 % lower.
Ashcroft have the 80% and a bolt reduction unit 1500.00 pounds.
Michael.
How much is the MD crawler running for?
Crawler GEARS or lower low range GEARS
or
Crawler BOX
They are 2 completely different things - the gears replace your existing one, the BOX is a bolt in selectable box - most peopleuse the word "crawler" when talking about the crawler box, not the gears.
MD 30% is about AUD$1700 don't know about the 40% - probably the same or a bit more. The advantage of the MD setup is you can use whatever high renge ratio you want.
As you said the ashcroft GEARS are 650GBP, the BOX is 1500GBP. AFAIK you can only run 1.2:1 high range with the Ashcroft setup.
The advantage of a crawler box is you keep your existing low range as well.
Ok I am talking about crawler gears
so MD has a crawler gears which lowers your low by 30%
Ashcroft lower it by 80%
I am now running 4.75 gears and 36" tyres and need a lower low range on xtreme rockcrawling.
I am trying to calculate the low range with MD versus Ascroft. i have an LT 230 with 4.75.
I am afraid with Ashcroft gears I will no longer have momentum
Crawler Box is too expensive but might be the best option for future savings
Has anyone fitted a dual transfer case on a Rover
jay
96 Disco Gamel Trophy 36"*12.5 ET'II's, F&R ARB's,4.75 R&P GBR,GBR F&R
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
As you may know Ashcroft has designed their low range gearset so that there is no overlap between high and low range i.e. low 5th is slightly lower geared than 1st gear in high. Good in a tractor maybe but I don't like the sounds of it in an off road/trail vehicle.
What I would like to know is if the Ashcroft underdrive (crawler box) can be used in conjunction with MD lower low range gearsets. That would be the ideal setup.
Seamus.
What I would like to know is if the Ashcroft underdrive (crawler box) can be used in conjunction with MD lower low range gearsets. That would be the ideal setup.
Seamus.
ex-mil 109 FFR, rotten 110 Tdi, XJ 4.0
If the 80% Ashcroft is too low, why would you go lower? An underdrive plus MD30% is about 350% lower than standard!1tonsoup wrote:As you may know Ashcroft has designed their low range gearset so that there is no overlap between high and low range i.e. low 5th is slightly lower geared than 1st gear in high. Good in a tractor maybe but I don't like the sounds of it in an off road/trail vehicle.
What I would like to know is if the Ashcroft underdrive (crawler box) can be used in conjunction with MD lower low range gearsets. That would be the ideal setup.
Seamus.
If Standard is say 40:1
then MD 30% is 52:1
Ashcroft 80% is 72:1
Ashcroft ud is 108:1
UD+MD30% is 140:1
Regards
Max P
Stereo by Simex!
Aschcroft low gears or even underdrive would be too low for anyone running larger tyres and larger gears(4.11+) I think.Maxtd5def wrote:If the 80% Ashcroft is too low, why would you go lower? An underdrive plus MD30% is about 350% lower than standard!1tonsoup wrote:As you may know Ashcroft has designed their low range gearset so that there is no overlap between high and low range i.e. low 5th is slightly lower geared than 1st gear in high. Good in a tractor maybe but I don't like the sounds of it in an off road/trail vehicle.
What I would like to know is if the Ashcroft underdrive (crawler box) can be used in conjunction with MD lower low range gearsets. That would be the ideal setup.
Seamus.
If Standard is say 40:1
then MD 30% is 52:1
Ashcroft 80% is 72:1
Ashcroft ud is 108:1
UD+MD30% is 140:1
Regards
Max P
You will at ratios 120:1 where the most you need is the most competitive rockcrawling situations is 90:1 or a 100:1
Ashcroft should have made a 40% and 60% to compete effectively with MD I think
96 Disco Gamel Trophy 36"*12.5 ET'II's, F&R ARB's,4.75 R&P GBR,GBR F&R
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
Who said anything about the Ashcroft being too low?If the 80% Ashcroft is too low, why would you go lower?
I was pointing out the fact that no overlap exists between high and low range. Thus there is a good chance that on a moderate trail you will find low range is too low and high range is too high. It would be extremely frustrating to find yourself in 5th low, needing another gear, where changing into 1.2:1 high range 1st gear is not low enough when for example, negotiating a steep descent. The end result is constantly having to switch between high and low range.
Seamus.
ex-mil 109 FFR, rotten 110 Tdi, XJ 4.0
There is no physical reason why you could not bot an Ashcroft underdrive unit to an LT230 with maxidrive low range gears.1tonsoup wrote:...What I would like to know is if the Ashcroft underdrive (crawler box) can be used in conjunction with MD lower low range gearsets. That would be the ideal setup.
Seamus.
The pto drive (for the underdrive unit) is from teeth on the rear of the input gear. Maxi drive only replace the low range gears, whereas I believe Ashcroft replace all of the gears to obtain 80% more reduction. So the new Ashcroft input gear may not have the pto drive teeth.
John
MichealHSV Rangie wrote:go the best option.
Stdd LT230 gears
PLUSS crawler box have the best options all around
its only $$$$$
MIchael.
This is why the Ascroft crawler gear set are an option to consider which is much cheaper.
The underdribe will not bolt on easy on a Rangie or a Disco as there is not place for it.
Looking at the ratios the Aschcroft will give me a 93:1 on my first low which is needed for the xtreme rockcrawling situations.
I can always shift to my high (1 or 2) for easy trailing
With the underdrive you will have some gears overlapping(between you high/low/underdrive low) so you will be paying for gears you migth already have.
96 Disco Gamel Trophy 36"*12.5 ET'II's, F&R ARB's,4.75 R&P GBR,GBR F&R
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
No, it replaces the input gear completely. There are pictures around of the unit apart. Input is a through shaft inside the new input gear. Output is back through the input gear.RUFF wrote:Is this correct? The Underdrive unit drives off and through the PTO gear on the rear of the Input Gear? Those little Teeth that are about 5mm wide?
[color=red]1991 Landrover 90 ex-MOD[/color]
Thanks Tony, my mistake. The crawler box incorporates a new input gear and does not drive through the pto teeth.RUFF wrote:Is this correct? The Underdrive unit drives off and through the PTO gear on the rear of the Input Gear? Those little Teeth that are about 5mm wide?Bush65 wrote:
The pto drive (for the underdrive unit) is from teeth on the rear of the input gear
However I believe I was correct in saying that the Ashcroft 80% lower reduction gears replace the input gear, so that is the most likely reason for them not being compatible with the underdrive.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
John
Here are pics of maxidrive (top) and ashcroft gears for the LT230.
Maxidrive uses the stock input gear and high range gears. The intermediate gear is modified for a smaller pinion for low range.
Note that the ashcroft input gear (left of bottom pic) is in a different position to stock. It is further to the rear (and still has the pto drive teeth).
Ashcroft intermediate gear (centre of bottom pic) does not have the centre gear like stock the LT230, which meshes with the input gear.
The different position of the input gear is why it wont work with the underdrive box.
Maxidrive uses the stock input gear and high range gears. The intermediate gear is modified for a smaller pinion for low range.
Note that the ashcroft input gear (left of bottom pic) is in a different position to stock. It is further to the rear (and still has the pto drive teeth).
Ashcroft intermediate gear (centre of bottom pic) does not have the centre gear like stock the LT230, which meshes with the input gear.
The different position of the input gear is why it wont work with the underdrive box.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
John
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests