Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
GQ Fuel Consumption
GQ Fuel Consumption
We all complain about it! The TB42 petrol engine is very heavy on fuel.
Our learned colleague "Bogged" will say it's all been tried before and is a waste of time, but contrary to what he thinks there is no reason why good maintenance and performance tuning techniques cannot improve both the performance AND economy of these motors.
I have a 1990 Maverick with 4.2 carby petrol motor. Over the next 6-12 months I will be carefully measuring my petrol consumption BEFORE and AFTER some simple motor work. I will be upgrading the following:
1. The exhaust: fitting a set of 2.5 inch or 3 inch extractors and hi-flow mufflers;
2. The ignition: adding a CDI ignition system, high-energy coil, performance leads and modified rotor button. I will be staying with points however for bush reliability. Why? The CDI system removes the need for high current to flow through the points. The result is that the points should last 50K+ before needing to be changed. And if the CDI fails, I can still get home;
3. Adding a snorkel and opening up the air intake: to increase the volume of cooler air entering the carby;
4. A free-flow performance air filter;
5. Dyno tuning: to get the timing and carby absolutely correct;
6. High performance oil, such as Penrite 15W50;
7. Experiment with the spark plug range: normal, hotter, cooler
At each stage I will carefully check the consumption, and use my best judgement as to whether I have gained economy and/or power.
I would be very interested if anyone has attempted something similar. If so, please share your results.
Cheers
Dave
Our learned colleague "Bogged" will say it's all been tried before and is a waste of time, but contrary to what he thinks there is no reason why good maintenance and performance tuning techniques cannot improve both the performance AND economy of these motors.
I have a 1990 Maverick with 4.2 carby petrol motor. Over the next 6-12 months I will be carefully measuring my petrol consumption BEFORE and AFTER some simple motor work. I will be upgrading the following:
1. The exhaust: fitting a set of 2.5 inch or 3 inch extractors and hi-flow mufflers;
2. The ignition: adding a CDI ignition system, high-energy coil, performance leads and modified rotor button. I will be staying with points however for bush reliability. Why? The CDI system removes the need for high current to flow through the points. The result is that the points should last 50K+ before needing to be changed. And if the CDI fails, I can still get home;
3. Adding a snorkel and opening up the air intake: to increase the volume of cooler air entering the carby;
4. A free-flow performance air filter;
5. Dyno tuning: to get the timing and carby absolutely correct;
6. High performance oil, such as Penrite 15W50;
7. Experiment with the spark plug range: normal, hotter, cooler
At each stage I will carefully check the consumption, and use my best judgement as to whether I have gained economy and/or power.
I would be very interested if anyone has attempted something similar. If so, please share your results.
Cheers
Dave
Last edited by challenger on Mon Jan 09, 2006 7:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dave Golding
0413 743 872
dgolding01@optusnet.com.au
0413 743 872
dgolding01@optusnet.com.au
Re: GQ Fuel Consumption
people on patrol list have tried all this over the years, with little or not worthy improvement for the investment.challenger wrote:We all complain about it! The TB42 petrol engine is very heavy on fuel.
But there is no reason why good maintenance and performance tuning techniques cannot dramatically improve both the performance AND economy of these motors.
I have a 1990 Maverick with 4.2 carby petrol motor. Over the next 6-12 months I will be carefully measuring my petrol consumption BEFORE and AFTER some simple motor work. I will be upgrading the following:
1. The exhaust: fitting a set of 2.5 inch or 3 inch extractors and hi-flow mufflers;
2. The ignition: adding a CDI ignition system, high-energy coil, performance leads and modified rotor button. I will be staying with points however for bush reliability. Why? The CDI system removes the need for high current to flow through the points. The result is that the points should last 50K+ before needing to be changed. And if the CDI fails, I can still get home;
3. Adding a snorkel and opening up the air intake: to increase the volume of cooler air entering the carby;
4. A free-flow performance air filter;
5. Dyno tuning: to get the timing and carby absolutely correct;
6. High performance oil, such as Penrite 15W50;
7. Experiment with the spark plug range: normal, hotter, cooler
At each stage I will carefully check the consumption, and use my best judgement as to whether I have gained economy and/or power.
I would be very interested if anyone has attempted something similar. If so, please share your results.
Cheers
Dave
OK, so what worked and what didn't?
----------------------------------------------------------
"...people on patrol list have tried all this over the years, with little or not worthy improvement for the investment."
----------------------------------------------------------
"...people on patrol list have tried all this over the years, with little or not worthy improvement for the investment."
Last edited by challenger on Mon Jan 09, 2006 7:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dave Golding
0413 743 872
dgolding01@optusnet.com.au
0413 743 872
dgolding01@optusnet.com.au
go search the archives.. CBF.challenger wrote:Rather than being totally negative, what worked and what didn't.
Please qualify your comments for each suggestion.
----------------------------------------------------------
"...people on patrol list have tried all this over the years, with little or not worthy improvement for the investment."
bogged wrote:would you like a tissue?challenger wrote:As some members seem to think they own this forum, if anyone else is interested or keen to offer constructive help and/or suggestions, please send me a PM, and we will keep what we learn to ourselves.
You can be such a tool sometimes Bogged

Don't ask me, ask them. I'm just runnin for my life myself.
Well they are all following you...
No they ain't, I'm just in front...............
Well they are all following you...
No they ain't, I'm just in front...............
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests