Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

rhs v hollow bar

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 762
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:46 pm
Location: Diamond Creek

rhs v hollow bar

Post by mule75 »

has anybody used a heavy wall rhs for an A frame or control arms?? just wondering cons n pro's (if any).
Posts: 2877
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:46 pm
Location: Goodna QLD

Post by ludacris »

I personally have not seen any but have heard of them. Not a bad idea though.

LudaCris
Cris's 4 X 4 Accessories & Suspension 0404 736 325 Rock Sliders From $499
Posts: 762
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:46 pm
Location: Diamond Creek

Post by mule75 »

it'd be heaps easier to make the a frame but not bein an engineer i couldnt understand why hollow bar is always used over rhs
Posts: 671
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:06 am
Location: Mornington

Post by YankeeDave »

size for size round tube/pipe has a higher 2nd moment of inertia, basically stronger and in all directions. But this dosnt mean rhs isnt any worse

depends on where the force is applied .

rhs is sometimes just as good if not better.
Jeep Wrangler TJ

Jeep Cherokee XJ
Posts: 259
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 11:32 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by Clown Boy »

Wouldn't tube be lighter tho, for same wall thickness?
Transport Engineering and Trucking Services
Archerfield Brisbane
Call Simon on 0407 628 191 and say Clown Boy sent you

He will look after your rig, trailer or fleet.
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:53 pm
Location: Wellington NZ

Post by doddzee »

I used 40x40x4 rhs to make my a-frame for my shorty which i have extended the wheelbase to 105", ?No real reason otherthan i had i lieing around and its a little easier to work with.

Image
Posts: 217
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 12:01 pm
Location: East BrisVegas

Post by V6XtraHilux »

round tube is easy to use, a pain to chop off at angles when making up an A-frame or similar stuff. Hollow tube is fantastic in in-line forces, as in drive shafts or flagpoles for instance. Its no good for side impact forces. Have you ever stood ontop of a can of coke, balanced on one foot? It'll hold ur weight, but as soon as you touch the wall of the can, it'll collapse. Ask anybody with coils and trailing arms, once you ding a trailing arm, the torque forces on the axle will bend the arms even more.

Square or rectangular tube is slightly heavier, but will take in-line loads as well as round tube, AND will take side loads heaps better than tube. Have u ever tried to bend a square tube on its corners? It has effectively 2 walls to resist the forces. Much better for trailing arms, slider bars, etc.
03 V6 Xtra Cab Hilux F&R Lockers 4' BL/susp 33' BFG MTs sliders ARB bullbar IPFs-workn 4 SAS$$
Posts: 5179
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by Shadow »

V6XtraHilux wrote:round tube is easy to use, a pain to chop off at angles when making up an A-frame or similar stuff. Hollow tube is fantastic in in-line forces, as in drive shafts or flagpoles for instance. Its no good for side impact forces. Have you ever stood ontop of a can of coke, balanced on one foot? It'll hold ur weight, but as soon as you touch the wall of the can, it'll collapse. Ask anybody with coils and trailing arms, once you ding a trailing arm, the torque forces on the axle will bend the arms even more.

Square or rectangular tube is slightly heavier, but will take in-line loads as well as round tube, AND will take side loads heaps better than tube. Have u ever tried to bend a square tube on its corners? It has effectively 2 walls to resist the forces. Much better for trailing arms, slider bars, etc.
rhs is probably only stronger due to the "ding factor" you mention (teknical term)

As someone else said, round tube is the same strength in all directions, RHS is not. With this fact in mind it is very easy to substitute the same wall thickness RHS for round tube (same weight? close?) if you know where the forces are coming from and orient the RHS the right way.
Posts: 1595
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 4:11 pm
Location: Warner, Brisbane Nth

Post by Spartacus »

i thinka lad from pirate did a complete 4 link front n rear
using RHS filled with T-section..
MULL
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests