Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Currently engineerd in Vic - being recalled/deregistered!

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 3349
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Not where you are

Post by Gribble »

Tojo wrote:most of you guys are missing the point. As long as your car is in reasonable condition and looks well maintained, has mudflaps, all the lights work, does not have a stupidly high lift and massive tyres you will have no dramas. I doubt they will target every single vehicle. If however you are one of the idiots who drive something with 8 inches of lift and 38 inch tyres on the road then i'd expect some attention. Adopt stealth tactics - have your vehicle that is safe and well maintained that blends in and drive in a manner that does not attract attention and you will fly under the radar (and don't crash!)
The point is your car is still illegal no matter how neat and tidy it looks, and it only takes one DOT officer or cop out of a cast of thousands who is having a bad day or has a personal hatred for 4wds to book you for all your worth.
\m/
God of Athiests
Posts: 8336
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 2:14 am
Location: Brownsville

Post by DamTriton »

AJ wrote:Had a long chat today with a helpful Vehicle Inspector from TransportSA. :cool:

SA remains unchanged in that:
4WDs are limited to a 50mm increase in tyre diameter over the size stated on the placard. Bigger tyres require eng cert.

Spring lifts are limited to a one third increase to the original OVERALL travel. Bigger lifts are OK with eng cert.

Increase in wheel offset is limited to 26mm overall for passenger vehicles and 4WDs with IFS, IRS or both. For 4WDs wive live front and rear axles the offset can increase by 51mm.

This is the current situation in SA and he doesnt believe anything will be changing.
Might be in SA, but we're talking about what is happening in Vic right now.
George Carlin, an American Comedian said; "Think of how stupid the average person is, and realise that half of them are stupider than that".
Posts: 4583
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Wheeling in my backyard

Post by sierrajim »

Whats actually happening without the internet BS :!: .

After reading this exaggerated thread (nothing unusual for outers) i called a couple of people i know who do know EXACTLY what is going on.

If you're concerned with the registration of your engineered, modified vehicle look at the Vicroads website at the list of approved engineers. A couple of engineers have been removed from that list.

If you don't see your engineer on that list. You may receive a letter from Vicroads.

Any vehicle recalled will be inspected, not necessarily de registered, if it complies you have nothing to worry about. If it does not your registration will be suspended and will be required to make your vehicle comply to the necessary ADR's.

As usual there are a number of people confusing modifications to a vehicle not needing an engineers report and modifications to a vehicle that do need an engineers report.

At the end of the day you can do almost anything to a motor vehicle and have it engineered as long as you can prove that it complies to ADR's. If you can prove this, then engineer will sign it off and they will register it.

I will also go out on a limb and say that you could probably get SPOA approved by QLD RTA if you wanted to throw that cash at getting an engineer to do a swerve/roll over test, brake test etc etc.
[quote="Harb"]Well I'm guessing that they didn't think everyone would carry on like a big bunch of sooky girls over it like they have........[/quote]
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: melbourne

bloody confusing road laws !!!!

Post by mmaaxx »

oK, WE ARE ALL TALKING ABOUT suspension lift limitations and tyres sizes, but does this new document for Vicroads specify anything about custom made bullbars being fitted and/or dual side rails and sidesteps?

Will I have to remove my expensive and big bullbar from my hilux and drive around with a "pedestrian friendly" plastic bumper on the front?

Image
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by Beastmavster »

I didnt read anything that specified new regulations for bullbars in the document. If anyone can find anything please let us all know.
Posts: 826
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 4:18 pm
Location: Northern NSW

Post by slosh »

After reading this thread I contacted both the RTA technical hotline and the engineer who approved 35's on my Patrol 3 weeks ago and as far as NSW is concerned NOTHING HAS CHANGED and probably will not FOR QUITE A WHILE YET.
As for any new laws being retrospective it seems that isn't even a consideration.
Apparently the transport dept in NSW has its hands full with Sydney issues.
Yes, I know this thread is about Vic, but there have been some references to NSW in the comments.
Posts: 3552
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 9:46 pm
Location: Ormond VIC

Re: bloody confusing road laws !!!!

Post by muppet_man67 »

mmaaxx wrote:oK, WE ARE ALL TALKING ABOUT suspension lift limitations and tyres sizes, but does this new document for Vicroads specify anything about custom made bullbars being fitted and/or dual side rails and sidesteps?

Will I have to remove my expensive and big bullbar from my hilux and drive around with a "pedestrian friendly" plastic bumper on the front?
looking at that bulbar I doubt it has complied with regulations before all this. they are quite specific about the bull bars and that they cannot protrude forwards at the top.
[url]http://www.vic.suzuki4wd.com/forum[/url]
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Re: bloody confusing road laws !!!!

Post by bogged »

muppet_man67 wrote:... looking at that bulbar I doubt it has complied with regulations before all this. they are quite specific about the bull bars and that they cannot protrude forwards at the top.
I though that this was only a recommendation not a law - yet...

if true, there goes the FAT bar off the market.
Image
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by Beastmavster »

Nope, though that may depend on state laws, anthing with forward protrusions, whether it be spotlights, fishing rod holders or stinger type bars has been banned for quite a few years...
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

Beastmavster wrote:Nope, though that may depend on state laws, anthing with forward protrusions, whether it be spotlights, fishing rod holders or stinger type bars has been banned for quite a few years...
I know the rod holders, stingers and sharp objects were no go, but the bar itself, i rememebr reading something stating that they were recommending things, and "hoped" the manufacturers (TJM etc) would follow the recommendations.
User avatar
AJ
Posts: 725
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 10:44 pm
Location: Whyalla SouthOz

Post by AJ »

For owners of GU wagons. This is from the series1 GU owners manual.

Image

Add 50mm to the diameter of the 245/85/16 tyres listed there and what do you get??? :cool:
Andrew - 1999 GU ST 4.2Turbodiesel Wagon
Whyalla SouthOz

My website: http://www.touring4x4.com/
Posts: 1143
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Quirindi, NSW

Post by bushy555 »

Something a little offtopic just to throw in. Just ignore this if it is totally irrelevant.

All them dopey little buzz box CRV's and other Euro type 4x4 and non-4x4 cars that have their brake lights, tail lights and reverse lights up near the roof line. They *should* be all illegal, according to current ADR's.

ADR 13:
Brake Lights, parking lights and blinkers are to be no more than 1200mm from the ground. Reverse lights to be no more than 1000mm from the ground.

Next time you see one of these dopey vehicles, do a rough measurement in your head, or go grab a tape measure. Some of them are well and truly above those figures.

If I'm wrong about that though, I'll acknowledge and accept it. Just that I had to lower my rear lights to pass a blue slip. And they are now way lower than some of them buzz box cars.
Bushies: http://www.angelfire.com/on4/bushy5560/ http://www.angelfire.com/on4/bushy5561/
Lightforce HID conversion stuff: http://www.angelfire.com/on4/bushy5551/
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by Beastmavster »

AJ wrote:For owners of GU wagons. This is from the series1 GU owners manual.


Add 50mm to the diameter of the 245/85/16 tyres listed there and what do you get??? :cool:
245 x 0.85 x 2 = 416.5 mm

416/25.4 = 16.39"

+16" for rim. = 32.39"

+50mm = 34.3"

Not 35"s. Guess you're on 34" JT's then :D
Not 35's....
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Liverpool NSW

Post by Charlie »

DAMKIA wrote:
muppet_man67 wrote:you need to include droop as well as uptravel? Im guessing it would be about double. I may be wrong.
Supposedly it cannot be changed more than 1/3 either way (above normal travel), but that probably wouldn't stop you from using a sway bar to limit the total "constrained" travel with super long travel suspension, and disconnecting the bar in the bush.
This is exactly what I questioned in my submission on the draft document, a lot of IFS cars are so limited by the swaybar the bumpstop travell is irrevant. Even the upward travel to the bumstop is very small in a lot IFS because its, not needed in the same way as a straight axle although removing the rubber bump stops gives something of a way out.
Regards Charlie
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Liverpool NSW

Post by Charlie »

grimbo wrote:working out lift from original travel doesn't mean that the new suspension can't have more travel. You can make a suspension work alot better with more travel without having to lift it. Lifting a suspension, especially on a lef sprung vejicle usuaully results in less travel due to stiffer springs beingused. Does it say anything about using longer springs because that is where travel can come from

This could lead to alot better thought suspension systems
For coil suspension the new code bit stricter. The old code required that the coil be unable to drop out wheras the new code requires the coil always be under tension making a lot of really long shocks illegal.
User avatar
AJ
Posts: 725
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 10:44 pm
Location: Whyalla SouthOz

Post by AJ »

Beastmavster wrote:245 x 0.85 x 2 = 416.5 mm

416/25.4 = 16.39"

+16" for rim. = 32.39"

+50mm = 34.3"

Not 35"s. Guess you're on 34" JT's then :D
Not 35's....
tire rack website came up with 32.6 so you're close :D
34s without needing eng cert is cool though :cool:
Andrew - 1999 GU ST 4.2Turbodiesel Wagon
Whyalla SouthOz

My website: http://www.touring4x4.com/
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by Beastmavster »

Well, using the mathematical calculation is probably how they'd do it for vic roads approval.


You may find you're actually allowed a tolerance on top of that - dunno what the tyre and rim manual says.


If 32.6" is the go then most 35"s would be legal
Posts: 4825
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Berwick vic

Re: bloody confusing road laws !!!!

Post by droopypete »

mmaaxx wrote:oK, WE ARE ALL TALKING ABOUT suspension lift limitations and tyres sizes, but does this new document for Vicroads specify anything about custom made bullbars being fitted and/or dual side rails and sidesteps?

Will I have to remove my expensive and big bullbar from my hilux and drive around with a "pedestrian friendly" plastic bumper on the front?

Image
Now that you included your number plate in the pic you may have to remove it sooner than you think.

Peter. (do you think the RTA can get outers?)
Cable bracing is the way of the future!

v840 said "That sounds like a booty fab, hack job piece of shit no offence."
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: brisbane southside

one day !

Post by hopeless »

hi all
it was only time don,t blame the road transport for this 4wds kill small
kids well thats what the news said !!! after all we do own the road, drive on the foot paths , suffer roadrage , stuff the bush up , hell i think we even started the war .
so they can,t ban buying a 4wd so let,s make it hard to do any mods that will stop us !!! but lets face it some of us do need to be pulled back in line
a real comp truck is just that they use them not pose driving around town
i do think all states should be the same that way we will all be legal and know where we stand .
thanks
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Re: bloody confusing road laws !!!!

Post by bogged »

droopypete wrote:Peter. (do you think the RTA can get outers?)
the cops are :rofl: :rofl:
User avatar
AJ
Posts: 725
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 10:44 pm
Location: Whyalla SouthOz

Re: bloody confusing road laws !!!!

Post by AJ »

bogged wrote:
droopypete wrote:Peter. (do you think the RTA can get outers?)
the cops are :rofl: :rofl:
I dont think there are any Vic cops here are there? Maybe RN can check for us...... :cool:

:rofl:
Andrew - 1999 GU ST 4.2Turbodiesel Wagon
Whyalla SouthOz

My website: http://www.touring4x4.com/
Posts: 5179
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Re: bloody confusing road laws !!!!

Post by Shadow »

droopypete wrote:
mmaaxx wrote:oK, WE ARE ALL TALKING ABOUT suspension lift limitations and tyres sizes, but does this new document for Vicroads specify anything about custom made bullbars being fitted and/or dual side rails and sidesteps?

Will I have to remove my expensive and big bullbar from my hilux and drive around with a "pedestrian friendly" plastic bumper on the front?

Image
Now that you included your number plate in the pic you may have to remove it sooner than you think.

Peter. (do you think the RTA can get outers?)
the vehicle only needs to comply with the ADR's in effect in the year of manufacture.
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

OK, been away for a while, only just waded through this thread.

Quick comment on the comparison with semi-automatic firearms: once the government made them illegal they compensated owners for the loss, because it's required by the Constitution. I don't know that a comparison with vehicle modifications is really valid, and I think that discussion is a little off topic. :?

I've recently been negotiating with engineers to get my mods approved so I can register my 4by in SA. The engineer who's been most helpful (speaking relatively here) has no idea when the NCOP will be adopted in SA, and says SA Transport is in no hurry.

He also stated that any modifications exceeding 50mm COMBINED LIFT will require engineering, and the engineering requirements under the NCOP are more stringent. Using braking tests as an example, I only need to prove that my vehicle is capable of passing a set braking test. Under the NCOP, he claims I would need to demonstrate that the braking capability (with larger tyres) is the same as the original configuration - i.e. NO deterioration in braking performance.

:cry:

Scott
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Liverpool NSW

Post by Charlie »

Hi Scott
The big problem with the NCOP is the cost and inconvience of the formal serve test rather than the engineer driving it and saying OK.Don't know about the brake test, once engineered you need a blue slip and I guess it up to the inspector whether he does a full rego check or just a change of vehicle details. I'm a bit confused about how you preserve the braking the braking perforance whist changing to biggeer wheels unless they mean the front and rear balance,lots of stuff be be worked out here.
Regards Charlie
Posts: 826
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 4:18 pm
Location: Northern NSW

Post by slosh »

Charlie wrote:I'm a bit confused about how you preserve the braking the braking perforance whist changing to biggeer wheels unless they mean the front and rear balance,lots of stuff be be worked out here.
That's what separates the good engineered trucks from the bad... changing diffs, adapting truck brakes- some guys do whatever it takes. My hilux on 35's stops (and handles) better than standard because of bigger braked, wider tracked 80 series diffs. Same for sierra on hilux diffs.
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 8:26 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by shakes »

I'm in the same boat.. I have to prove to my engineer that I have upgraded my axle strength, brakes etc by the equilivent percantage of tire size increase.... he has no drama's engineering 35's as long as I can prove to him I've upgraded everything accordingly

Simon
Posts: 1284
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: forest lake BUILDING BOOTYFAB BARWORK

Post by frp88 »

I have measured my sus travel cos my spring are flat in the front.I lifted the cruiser up with a forklift until the wheel is of the ground.235mm is the travel so div by 3 and 3"lift is O.K for me.I could go 2"body which is more then enough.I have a question why would you want to drive on 35's with fuel being so high. :? Anyone wanting a big legal lift go air bag up and down when you want to :D
LETS GO BRONCOS
Posts: 1284
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: forest lake BUILDING BOOTYFAB BARWORK

Post by frp88 »

I not sure that only the trucks with 35 will be called back shoudn't all spring overs be included :finger: cos a 6 to 7 inch lift would be over 1/3 off travel yes :D there not calling all trucks back and go to the comps to get regos are some off you guys a bit paranoid
LETS GO BRONCOS
Posts: 1931
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 10:29 am
Location: Everything 4WD, 86 Camms Rd Cranbourne

Re: Currently engineerd in Vic - being recalled/deregistered

Post by GUJohnno »

bogged wrote:
Anything engineered with bigger tyres, and/or higher suspension according to Vicroads, will be recalled, and deregistered until it complies...
You have an engineers certificate for 6" lift, have you reieved anything to say this has been revoked?
My club
www.vfwdc.com
My store
Everything 4WD
86 Camms Road Cranbourne
www.everything4wd.com.au
sales@everything4wd.com.au
Phone: 03 59955055
Posts: 463
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 10:15 pm
Location: Kingston,Hobart, Tasmania

Re: bloody confusing road laws !!!!

Post by justinC »

bogged wrote:
muppet_man67 wrote:... looking at that bulbar I doubt it has complied with regulations before all this. they are quite specific about the bull bars and that they cannot protrude forwards at the top.
I though that this was only a recommendation not a law - yet...

if true, there goes the FAT bar off the market.
Image
Is that OIL dripping out under the 'trol??? R U running a Landy drive train??? Or is it what Rover call a 'controlled sweat'

JC
'92 Rangie Sherwood/turbo intercooled isuzu4BD1 /ACE/ full leather/2.5" exh/2.5" body lift/DeCarbon shocks/LR tanks/LT95 back in and OK now, Sals conversion soon...
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests