Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:17 am
SuperiorEngineering wrote:Would you have a link to the NZ forum that has this post ?
http://www.offroadexpress.co.nz/Forums/ ... or#p173557
steve from advantage 4wd
Aussie Hardcore Wheelers
https://outerlimits4x4.com.au/
SuperiorEngineering wrote:Would you have a link to the NZ forum that has this post ?
Yeah THANKS Dano....I'm with what KIWI said and in fact while there are 1 or 2 people who make drop boxes here I chose to get mine from Superior last year.dano80 wrote:Yeah, I wish the Kiwis would all go home.......
Dano.
No probs I've spent a lot of time living and working in Sydney, Perth & Cairns and most Kiwi's I knew or came into contact with also spoke of home AND what it DIDN'T have that Aust DID have..after all thats why we were there.dano80 wrote:Yeah it was a generalisation of Kiwis, my gripe about them is that they get over here and say new zealand this, and new zealand that......If its so good, GO HOME!
Sorry about the gripe (says getting off soap box!) back to thread.
Dano.
Copyright can be much easier to enforce than patent infringement.jessie928 wrote: it woudl be difficult if there is no international patent on the arms.
Jes
What spring rate for the rear coils would make the front end flex better for SWB that is 2.1T?SuperiorEngineering wrote:
In R&D we found that if you were to go a bit heavier on the rear coils this makes the front end work a lot better as far as flex, it also stops a lot of body roll.
My red GQ is over 3t with 270lbs front coils EFS and 280 lbs rear coils EFS, this worked pretty good but slow it was a bit bouncy in the rear, and high speed the ass end was a bit prone to bounce on the rebound after going over a jump ,the front with super flex arms was good. high speed driving was okay.
We changed the rear coils to 340lbs dobinson coils and massive difference in handling both high speed as well as slow speed.
No less flex in the front or rear ,if anything the front flexed more due to the rear being a bit firmer and forcing the front to flex.
I run no sway bars front or rear , tough dog front 4" 80# cruiser with towers lifted 2 inchs, rear is 18" FOA remote resovoir with long arms and standard top mounted arms, hydraulic bumpstops.
This setup easily can be driven in rockcrawling or high speed events with no changes to anything.
Before you try the front swaybar just go to a slightly heavier rear coil and see how that goes, i think you will be pleased with the results.
Give me a call and i will get you the coils you will need.
sorry, been really busy But I am doing the drawings for the 2" versions, as a lot of guys seem to be getting lower lifts. also looking at doing some proper shock tower spacers, so you can fit big shocks on ~2-3" lifts and get max flex.bogged wrote:any updates?
your allowed to be busy1MadEngineer wrote:sorry, been really busy But I am doing the drawings for the 2" versions, as a lot of guys seem to be getting lower lifts. also looking at doing some proper shock tower spacers, so you can fit big shocks on ~2-3" lifts and get max flex.bogged wrote:any updates?
Greg
Recently raised my shock towers, I don't have a body lift and raised them 50mm and couldn't get towers back in, lowered to 40mm same problem, lowered to 35mm and they fitted, then raised them with 15mm plate spacers. Wheel arch needed hole to access the top nut for the shock.1MadEngineer wrote:sorry, been really busy But I am doing the drawings for the 2" versions, as a lot of guys seem to be getting lower lifts. also looking at doing some proper shock tower spacers, so you can fit big shocks on ~2-3" lifts and get max flex.bogged wrote:any updates?
Greg
Perfect.1MadEngineer wrote:sorry, been really busy But I am doing the drawings for the 2" versions, as a lot of guys seem to be getting lower lifts. also looking at doing some proper shock tower spacers, so you can fit big shocks on ~2-3" lifts and get max flex.bogged wrote:any updates?
Greg
I have only had mine for 1 month and the biggest problem I have found is getting the rear spring rates right. I replaced all my suspesnion when I installed the arms and due too my rear spring rate being to soft( medium duty rear coils and soft duty front) I have tones of rear travel and frontend hardly flexes compared to the stock arms!B.D.R wrote:To the people that have had these arms for a while, is there any problems at all?
Been reading about these thing's and i'm redy to buy a set, just want some feed back from people that have had them for a while now.
How's this working for you now?SIM79 wrote:I have only had mine for 1 month and the biggest problem I have found is getting the rear spring rates right. I replaced all my suspesnion when I installed the arms and due too my rear spring rate being to soft( medium duty rear coils and soft duty front) I have tones of rear travel and frontend hardly flexes compared to the stock arms!
I have ordered some new stiffer rear springs that are 294 pounds and apparently these should stiffen the rear up and cause the front end to flex more without loosing flex at the rear.
good stuff! should ride a bit better too? less pitching? sorta compensates for the shorter wheelbase...SIM79 wrote:Its a lot better, as I am running new 294 pound rear coils and this made a big difference as now the front and rear are working to gether at the same time( very little body roll), before the rear was doing majority of the flexing( heaps of body roll).
Thanks,SIM79 wrote:Its a lot better, as I am running new 294 pound rear coils and this made a big difference as now the front and rear are working to gether at the same time( very little body roll), before the rear was doing majority of the flexing( heaps of body roll).
Dobin C70-335V.zookimal wrote: Any chance of a model number?
I've been running a rear sway bar. Better in some spots, worse in others. Having a play on little tyresSIM79 wrote:Fitting rear swaybar has impoved the frontend flex
This part number can only be purchased from (us) Suspension Stuff.SIM79 wrote:Dobin C70-335V.zookimal wrote: Any chance of a model number?
Hey Sim, Are these 294lb coils of yours LWB 3" springs and any ideaSIM79 wrote:Its a lot better, as I am running new 294 pound rear coils and this made a big difference as now the front and rear are working to gether at the same time( very little body roll), before the rear was doing majority of the flexing( heaps of body roll).
they'd be 20-21mm .twodiffs wrote:Hey Sim, Are these 294lb coils of yours LWB 3" springs and any ideaSIM79 wrote:Its a lot better, as I am running new 294 pound rear coils and this made a big difference as now the front and rear are working to gether at the same time( very little body roll), before the rear was doing majority of the flexing( heaps of body roll).
of wire diameter?
cheers
Jamie
Its hard to measure but they are around 21 or 22mm.pinkfloyddsotm wrote:they'd be 20-21mm .twodiffs wrote:Hey Sim, Are these 294lb coils of yours LWB 3" springs and any ideaSIM79 wrote:Its a lot better, as I am running new 294 pound rear coils and this made a big difference as now the front and rear are working to gether at the same time( very little body roll), before the rear was doing majority of the flexing( heaps of body roll).
of wire diameter?
cheers
Jamie
Cheers, looking into it over here and i've found a distributor who can give me LWB 3" in either 19mm or 20mm options (currently have 19mm coils but they are showing signs of sagging).SIM79 wrote:Its hard to measure but they are around 21 or 22mm.pinkfloyddsotm wrote:they'd be 20-21mm .twodiffs wrote:Hey Sim, Are these 294lb coils of yours LWB 3" springs and any ideaSIM79 wrote:Its a lot better, as I am running new 294 pound rear coils and this made a big difference as now the front and rear are working to gether at the same time( very little body roll), before the rear was doing majority of the flexing( heaps of body roll).
of wire diameter?
cheers
Jamie