6.5 rangie wrote:If this has been answered before then i appolagize, but why are 35's banned. Have had a brief look but no real answer. (sorry for not searching better)
Registration authorities find it easier to ban modifications than manage an approvals process. (So people go ahead and perform the modifications however they see fit (booty-fab
) and the authorities have zero control over it.
)
Larger tyres affect handling, braking efficiency, and speedo accuracy (don't anybody try to tell me how well your 4" lifted Cruitrol on 37's handles - compared to stock height on stock tyres, it's not as good.
)
A body lift only lifts what's inside the body - the chassis and the engine/gearbox combination stays where they are with respect to the ground.
A suspension lift raises everything which is suspended - body and chassis, but not axles. This raises your centre of gravity more than a body lift will (and generally provides better clearance for off-road work.)
Larger tyres lift EVERYTHING - hubs and all, making for the largest increase in ground clearance, and also raises CoG the most.
Larger tyres also have increased angular momentum, which adds to the work your brakes must do, as well as decreasing your braking efficiency (because of the increased radius.)
Large tyres alter your scrub radius, which places increased loads on bearings and steering components, which can lead to increased wear and premature failure.
Larger tyres come closer to body, chassis and suspension components, and generally create rubbing problems under some conditions. Most people also opt for wider tyres when they increase diameter,
which makes the problem worse.
Some choose to fit their larger tyres to rims with a different offset, which can improve the scrub radius problem, but many go too far - creating massive increases in vehicle track (which can again increase loads on steering and bearings) and having their tyres protrude WAY beyond their guards, and no longer being covered by their mud flaps.
All of the above issues can be addressed by people who know what they're doing, which needs to be checked and approved to meet "standards." But somebody needs to set the standards and develop the testing procedures, and our public servants don't like to work too hard - so they simply say no.
My opinions - feel free to disregard them.
Scott