I no motorwise there different but I ment as in size etc like bellhousing and ya engine mounts and all that sorta gearcrankycruiser wrote:brentz wrote:As said a 350 chev is just a carbie ls1 there same just one injected one not the reason why they get put in is cause easy conversion no electrics to get wet while 4wding and there's still a huge range of parts available more than a ls1 most likely and all ya need to pass emissions is if it's older than the car have it on straight gas which most 4wders will like
we put a 350 in my old mans cruiser and we were gonna Go a Holden donk but got told from a few people that if ya need parts and ya stranded in middle of no where more chances of getting chev parts than anything
LOL at that comment!
LS is just like a 350? only in size mate. even an iron block LS isnt like a 350
Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
Why 350 Chev?
Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators
Re: Why 350 Chev?
brentz
TUF-60 starting build soon
TUF-60 starting build soon
Im here for the sausage!
Re: Why 350 Chev?
awsome mabe you can enlighten on the 396 sbRED60 wrote:No web from my end... I used to own one.. a 302 chev that is... but that's another story...nerida67 wrote:Red 60,
Yep your right ,my bad
A quick google search finds the answer
Oh the advantage of the web
that red60 mentioned!
mmmm SAUSAGE
Im here for the sausage!
Re: Why 350 Chev?
actually its general motors companyLoanrangie wrote:GMC is not GM Canada, its general motors coach/truck division shortened to GMC.pozman wrote:if talking about GMC here, its actually general motors Canada, but yes its all gmZeyphly wrote:it probably would have been dedicated gas to pass emissions. Your GM ls1 is a chev motor they have just dropped the C as in general motors cheverolet and also general motors holden for gmh
man that shits meozz wrote: maybe its the same people who put chev badges on holdens
mmmm SAUSAGE
Re: Why 350 Chev?
I thought it was just GM?
GMC - general motors chevy
GMH - general motors holden
etc
GMC - general motors chevy
GMH - general motors holden
etc
Re: Why 350 Chev?
I believe LoanRangie has it right. GM (and not GMC) is the accepted abbreviation for General Motors Company. GMC is a reference to their truck and coach division, which sold trucks that were similar to chevy trucks but were not chevy trucks.
GMH is General Motors Holden.
Yes it is a bit weird but that's what you get when things evolve organically over time instead of all being laid out at the start. That is my understanding anyway!
GMH is General Motors Holden.
Yes it is a bit weird but that's what you get when things evolve organically over time instead of all being laid out at the start. That is my understanding anyway!
This is not legal advice.
Re: Why 350 Chev?
The 100kw fourbanger will probably go just aswell as the bodgy old 6cyl diesels as they don't have much hp or torque. The newer motors like the ls1 run 6speed manuals to make them more driveable and to increase the fuel economy by dropping the revs right back when doing highway speeds. I reckon the ls1 in my cruiser would go quite well with a 3 speed manual but it'd be painful offroad and would suck through the juice as it'd be revving to much or to little. For example I drive around town in 3rd pretty much all the time and only have to change down to 2nd when taking off from a complete stop as it has the torque there. In the end there still isn't a replacement for displacement IMO and the new big motors like the LS and efi diesels make tuning that much more precise you can get huge amounts of power with good fuel economy and it is as easy as plugging it into a computer instead of having to pull carbies apart to change jets and using guess work.nerida67 wrote:The problem with the high tech or late model motors,
Sure they put out fair power (not torque) as compared to their replacements
But go stick a 100 KW odd four banger in a 3 tonne 4x4 as see how they go
Its not just the KW or HP figure you have to look at
Alot of new cars have 5-6 speeds to suit the power/torque curve of the motors
Cars of years ago had 2 speed autos and 3 speed manuals
Like comparing apples to oranges
More Suzuki parts going to the big Suzuki Heaven in the sky!
Re: Why 350 Chev?
brentz wrote:I no motorwise there different but I ment as in size etc like bellhousing and ya engine mounts and all that sorta gearcrankycruiser wrote:brentz wrote:As said a 350 chev is just a carbie ls1 there same just one injected one not the reason why they get put in is cause easy conversion no electrics to get wet while 4wding and there's still a huge range of parts available more than a ls1 most likely and all ya need to pass emissions is if it's older than the car have it on straight gas which most 4wders will like
we put a 350 in my old mans cruiser and we were gonna Go a Holden donk but got told from a few people that if ya need parts and ya stranded in middle of no where more chances of getting chev parts than anything
LOL at that comment!
LS is just like a 350? only in size mate. even an iron block LS isnt like a 350
bellhousings are completly different, as are engine mounts.. a ls will not just drop in where a 350 is.
80 xtra cab
Supercharged LS1, Locked n shit
80 Wagon, TD Tourer, locked, Interco 35s, G turbo
Supercharged LS1, Locked n shit
80 Wagon, TD Tourer, locked, Interco 35s, G turbo
Re: Why 350 Chev?
What do you think Chev is mate if it's not General Motors?ozz wrote: but it's a GM engine not chevy. I dont know
Re: Why 350 Chev?
You could say the same about holden then couldnt you?
Re: Why 350 Chev?
I said 400..... from mem was 4.125" bore x 3.75" stroke.. thnk that comes to a whisker over 400 cubes...external dimensions were the same for all sbc as far as I know.....differences >>>> siamesed bores..... shorter rods..... think they had different sized mains and/or bigends.... came with crap heads... they were used in trucks a lot... didn't rev but could be made to go ok with mods... that's all I can remember about 'em ...shortyq wrote:awsome mabe you can enlighten on the 396 sbRED60 wrote:No web from my end... I used to own one.. a 302 chev that is... but that's another story...nerida67 wrote:Red 60,
Yep your right ,my bad
A quick google search finds the answer
Oh the advantage of the web
that red60 mentioned!
Show me the money..SHOW ME THE MONEY
Im here for the sausage!
Re: Why 350 Chev?
my bad, i meant nerida67!RED60 wrote:I said 400..... from mem was 4.125" bore x 3.75" stroke.. thnk that comes to a whisker over 400 cubes...external dimensions were the same for all sbc as far as I know.....differences >>>> siamesed bores..... shorter rods..... think they had different sized mains and/or bigends.... came with crap heads... they were used in trucks a lot... didn't rev but could be made to go ok with mods... that's all I can remember about 'em ...shortyq wrote:awsome mabe you can enlighten on the 396 sbRED60 wrote:No web from my end... I used to own one.. a 302 chev that is... but that's another story...nerida67 wrote:Red 60,
Yep your right ,my bad
A quick google search finds the answer
Oh the advantage of the web
that red60 mentioned!
396sb pfft, zarkus would roll in his grave!lol
mmmm SAUSAGE
Re: Why 350 Chev?
Maybe their wasnt a 396 small block
My bad
Considering i havent lived,breathed, or worked on anything GM or GMH or GMC for over 10-15 years
Memory can do things like that
But atleast i can admit MISTAKES
Sorry MR perfect
My bad
Considering i havent lived,breathed, or worked on anything GM or GMH or GMC for over 10-15 years
Memory can do things like that
But atleast i can admit MISTAKES
Sorry MR perfect
Re: Why 350 Chev?
Another point that almost no-one considers is the efficiency of the engine they're putting in.Dooley wrote:What I don't get is the patrols with detroit diesels... I understand that it would be a much simpler and easier engine to work on.
But my quick google reasearch shows:
By numbers.
6.5L V8 Turbo (Detroit Diesel)
160 kW @ 3,200 rpm / 597 N·m @ 1,800 rpm
3.0L V6 Twin Turbo (Ford/Land Rover)
180 kW @ 4,000 rpm / 600 N·m @ 2,000 rpm
Factor in the detroit is a cast iron block and head, compared to compacted graphite iron block and alloy head. Not sure on actual weight...
I understand the detroit is probably a lot easier and simpler to work on and do a swap with, but you see enough ricers with all sorts of swaps so it would be possible, to me on paper it is a much better engine.
It can be hard to get absolute figures, but it's very easy to start comparing how many Nm/litre, higher specific torque gives a more efficient engine.
Why does this matter so much?
Lower fuel consumption.
More torque and power for the same engine size.
Lower heat rejection (don't need massive alloy radiators etc).
Those detroit 6.2 and 6.5 are terrible regarding efficiency. Like 30% less efficient than my 25 year old Isuzu diesel.
The result is diesel engines that are hard to keep cool and drink like petrols while going like old diesels.
Re: Why 350 Chev?
Had a longish message which the Forums somehow ate. To summarize: you are wrong about the 302 small block, which was a very powerful little motor (350 bore and 283 stroke) mostly built for road-racing.
Still, a crap engine for a 4x4 since they have no low-end torque and were made to rev to the sky.
Still, a crap engine for a 4x4 since they have no low-end torque and were made to rev to the sky.
Jeeps wrote:[
Some of those smaller older V8's, there's not a lot of power output compared to modern engines. The 302, 305 & 307 V8's all put out less power & torque than my AMC 242 straight six. And now 20 years on the 242 is piddly compared to modern 4 cylinders
I remember back in the mid 90's when the XJ was introduced to australia and then the wrangler in 96/97 and everyone was raving about how much power those jeep engines put out, and that was because they were all used to toyota & nissan's engine power
cheers
Re: Why 350 Chev?
Its very hard to compare older engines to newer
Especially when comparing HP/KW or N/m or Ft/lbs
Many of the older style motors didnt have stuff like
Injection,
electric fuel pumps,clutch fans,less restrictive exhausts ect
(all power hungry devices)
The old holden red motors (3.3l)came with a piddly little single barrell carb
(ride on mowers nearly have bigger ones)
Comparing the output of that to say a 6 cylinder with injection ect
Is not a fair comparison by a long shot
Yes engines have come along way in the years
But the combustion engine is not a highly efficient starting point
Especially when comparing HP/KW or N/m or Ft/lbs
Many of the older style motors didnt have stuff like
Injection,
electric fuel pumps,clutch fans,less restrictive exhausts ect
(all power hungry devices)
The old holden red motors (3.3l)came with a piddly little single barrell carb
(ride on mowers nearly have bigger ones)
Comparing the output of that to say a 6 cylinder with injection ect
Is not a fair comparison by a long shot
Yes engines have come along way in the years
But the combustion engine is not a highly efficient starting point
Re: Why 350 Chev?
40+% from a decent diesel.nerida67 wrote:Yes engines have come along way in the years
But the combustion engine is not a highly efficient starting point
Interestingly enough, diesel efficiency hasn't really improved lately. Specific output has, emissions have, noise has, but peak efficiency on a good diesel motor then is pretty much the same as peak efficiency on a good diesel motor now.
Re: Why 350 Chev?
youve all left out 1 of the main reasons why ppl put 350 chevs into 4WD's...
have any of you heard the beautiful sound of a 350 working its way through mud???????
shits all over any V6 Turbo or jap engine...
have any of you heard the beautiful sound of a 350 working its way through mud???????
shits all over any V6 Turbo or jap engine...
1974 FJ40 - 5ltr V8, 60 power steering, 60 diffs, 6" lift in total, twin air lockers, 37" TSL Boggers
Re: Why 350 Chev?
The only thing a 350 chev and a LS1 share is the bore spacing and the fact they are V8's. Its clear you dont know your V8's. There are more running LS1's in AU then 350 chev's and parts are very easy to get but rarely required. Bolt patterns are similar (not the same) and some gearboxes will fit both but not all. The biggest advantage is its efficiency and output is MUCH better than the 1st gen 350 (we are upto 4 generation LS series now). Its not impossible to put a LS1 into a 350 chev powered car but its not as simple as bolting it in.brentz wrote:As said a 350 chev is just a carbie ls1 there same just one injected one not the reason why they get put in is cause easy conversion no electrics to get wet while 4wding and there's still a huge range of parts available more than a ls1 most likely and all ya need to pass emissions is if it's older than the car have it on straight gas which most 4wders will like
we put a 350 in my old mans cruiser and we were gonna Go a Holden donk but got told from a few people that if ya need parts and ya stranded in middle of no where more chances of getting chev parts than anything
Re: Why 350 Chev?
More LS1s than 350s in aus ?????
Thats a tuff call
20 odd years ago just about every 2nd holden was chev powered
The LS1s are certainly a step up,but alot prefer the old skool,simplicity of the ol 350s
Thats a tuff call
20 odd years ago just about every 2nd holden was chev powered
The LS1s are certainly a step up,but alot prefer the old skool,simplicity of the ol 350s
Re: Why 350 Chev?
I have an inj 454 going into my patrol at the moment... .
have a td42t for offroad but nothing..I mean NOTHING beats the exhaust note from a nice sweet v8.
have a td42t for offroad but nothing..I mean NOTHING beats the exhaust note from a nice sweet v8.
only the first roll hurts, then its a ride..
Re: Why 350 Chev?
Actually, there is a 396 Gen1 SBC. It is not a factory offering, but is a stroker 400 crank in a 350 block.
The 383 SBC is a standard 400 crank in 350 block, and it is also an aftermarket creation.
The 383 SBC is a standard 400 crank in 350 block, and it is also an aftermarket creation.
Re: Why 350 Chev?
I'v been in trucks for years and owned td42 GQ's aswell, the old school trucks have big motors with low power and so did the old GQ patrols. New trucks run smaller motors high psi and more power, as the same for patrols. Eg scania 16L turbo (8psi)v8 = 500 hp as compared to new truck running 12L turbo (15-18psi) 6 cyl. The v8 has done 2.5-3 millon klms up for a rebuild the 6 cyl at 3 millon klms on 2nd rebuild and tiered, and blown a few heads.
The old TD42 ute 1989 mod my farming unlce owns, tacho stopped working in 1994 at 380,000 something klms but is still running every day today. The 2.8L rodeo my mother inlaw ownes 1994 mod at 360,000 ? klms had a rebuild at 290,000 klms and is being replaced later this mounth.
A TB42, 45 is the same as the deisel motor but petrol, and have better power and rev. I have gone to a GU TB 45, micro tech LT10 computor and GQ 5spd knowing that i will be abell to source parts easy and have good power to play with and it all bolts up. And is for sale as I am looking for a SWB.
The old TD42 ute 1989 mod my farming unlce owns, tacho stopped working in 1994 at 380,000 something klms but is still running every day today. The 2.8L rodeo my mother inlaw ownes 1994 mod at 360,000 ? klms had a rebuild at 290,000 klms and is being replaced later this mounth.
A TB42, 45 is the same as the deisel motor but petrol, and have better power and rev. I have gone to a GU TB 45, micro tech LT10 computor and GQ 5spd knowing that i will be abell to source parts easy and have good power to play with and it all bolts up. And is for sale as I am looking for a SWB.
MAX TRAXION
0429-193238
Some where in the dust......
0429-193238
Some where in the dust......
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 110 guests