Page 2 of 3
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 10:10 pm
by Monty
Just spent a long time on The RTA website looking through pages and pages of bulletins on engineering. There is no mention of this new standard
engineering
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 10:14 pm
by mud gu
i have a 2002 gu patrol with 6 inch spring lift a 2 inch body lift and 35s. does this mean i am now screwed?
Re: engineering
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 10:19 pm
by bogged
mud gu wrote:i have a 2002 gu patrol with 6 inch spring lift a 2 inch body lift and 35s. does this mean i am now screwed?
is it engineered already? if not, attempt to get it done
engineering
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 10:25 pm
by mud gu
its not engineered but its also my work truck so i could be really screwed.
a mate got his gq engineered with 8 inch springs 3 inch body lift and his 38s on might have to see that engineer.
Re: engineering
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 10:36 pm
by bogged
mud gu wrote: and his 38s on might have to see that engineer.
which 38's? Cant really think of many road legal ones..
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 10:41 pm
by Slunnie
I've just been told no chance with JT2's due to bias construction, and these do have speed and weight ratings.
engineering
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 10:41 pm
by mud gu
yeah well i gotta get mynn back on the road before i can get it engineered
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 12:22 am
by -Nemesis-
Monty wrote:Just spent a long time on The RTA website looking through pages and pages of bulletins on engineering. There is no mention of this new standard
Probably because the "new" bulletin is yet to be released
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 7:19 am
by Wooders
Hmm hopefully this lift law will not effect us with the funbags
But more hopefully they will limit it to suspension and body lifts
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 10:46 am
by Maxtd5def
Slunnie wrote:I've just been told no chance with JT2's due to bias construction, and these do have speed and weight ratings.
Slunnie is that under existing rules or these new rules?
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 10:55 am
by Slunnie
As far as I'm aware thats under the current rules. This is what Mannells have just told me.
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 1:55 pm
by bruiser
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 2:32 pm
by Tiny
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 7:00 pm
by Syzygy
so i would need a cert if i was to get a 2" suspension lift with a 1" increase in tyre size as the total lift is greater than 2"?
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 7:17 pm
by customhilux
Bentzook wrote:So, on my zook, fitted with air springs, I have no bodi-lift, but can have 0" to 12" air lift in 10 seconds. I put the air springs in for the limo comfort, but at any time could raise it 1 foot. So in reality the vehicle has been lowered, showing no suspension lift at all.
Depending what tyres I want to run, I could slam the chassis onto the ground
u do need it engineered, but u can buy a valve, that when the car is drivin, it sits at a normal ride height, and can't be adjusted,
then bypass it, after rego, engineering and shit like that
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 7:33 pm
by berazafi
why even bothered getting it engineered, if you are just going to remove the bits that get it passed, i dont see the point, why not just register it then do you mods
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 7:53 pm
by Screwy
The only reason i will get mine engineered is cause i want to be able to drive it around on the road
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 7:54 pm
by Slunnie
Alright, well I'm now booked in for a cert on Sat morning.
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 8:22 pm
by ozy1
i spoke to a well known enginneer today, and has advised this is all a massive roumour that has been started, we will have to wait and see............................
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 8:28 pm
by RB zook
ozy1 wrote:i spoke to a well known enginneer today, and has advised this is all a massive roumour that has been started, we will have to wait and see............................
i really hope so
havnt got money for engineers
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 8:30 pm
by Screwy
niether do i yet
but the car wont move till i have it
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 8:38 pm
by STUMPY
I don't really see a problem with these changes. For those with vehicles that are not currently engineered they still have to run the same risks. If i had hit someone in my old 4runner (not engineered) and killed them, i'd be up for manslaughter. That is the risk that you run, regardless of the changes.
I can see that on the competition scene we are going to have larger numbers of newer, stock vehicles competing whilst the more modified classes will comprise largely of your older trucks. Even with the max lift rules being imposed, you'll still be able to build capable trucks.
Like with all rules, they will be able to be bent and manipulated. An example of this is the mogrover. With exception of some modifications, it has minimal lift yet is pushing the limits in the hardest comps in australia.
I wonder what the rulings will be on chassis modification such as dropped hangers and shortening?
Joel
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 8:54 pm
by high n mighty
I think dropped hangers would definately be a part of lift no matter how you look at it. And surely chassis chopping is fine if braced correctly.
I have to get engineered for rego anyway, the last step......AHHHHHHH.
So I'll be calling an engineer tomorrow and booking whether these rules are rumour or truthful. Either way I might see if I can get another couple of inches in mine before the apointment to max it. Doubt I will have the time though
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 9:01 pm
by r0ck_m0nkey
ozy1 wrote:i spoke to a well known enginneer today, and has advised this is all a massive roumour that has been started, we will have to wait and see............................
They might just start enforcing existing laws, like the amount of vehicles illegaly fitted with 31" tyres, as your only allowed to increase tyre/wheel combination diameter by 15mm over the largest optional tyre/wheel combination available for your vehicle without needing an engineers certificate.
It's a little ammusing to see people jump up and down scared of "future rule changes" when they don't even realise how blatently abused the existing ones are.
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 9:05 pm
by ozy1
yeah, im tending to think it will be just inforced alot more, so there will be alot of people forced to enginner to keep the rig registered, which i dont see a problem with,
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 9:10 pm
by high n mighty
I think it will be enforced hardcore if it comes in. I had a mate ask if he could register his nissan as a tractor if he misses the deadline. Never heard of that one and I bet it isn't allowed to do 110kmh.
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 9:15 pm
by cbr
Syzygy wrote:so i would need a cert if i was to get a 2" suspension lift with a 1" increase in tyre size as the total lift is greater than 2"?
In WA this is the case!
You not only have to get an engineering cert, but a lane change tet needs to be done.
Chris.
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 9:38 pm
by bogged
ozy1 wrote:i spoke to a well known enginneer today, and has advised this is all a massive roumour that has been started.
... by a few engineers that are after a fast $50k with 100+ 4wders panicing to get em done.
people might find it hard to get a booking with an engineer if this is true, as everyone will be on the phone
high n mighty wrote:Either way I might see if I can get another couple of inches in mine before the apointment to max it. Doubt I will have the time though
Borrow some shocks, springs etc!!!
Posted: Wed May 11, 2005 1:09 am
by Wooders
Just on the tyres - many bias ply are indeed road legal...the catch is your vechile must have had bias ply from the factory.....and if it was then strictly speaking you shouldn't run Radials on it
At least the lift rules shouldn't effect portal lifts
And the joys of airbags - yup it's only 2" lift
Posted: Wed May 11, 2005 8:04 am
by CV Smasher
Ok who is organising a protest against the kill joys at the RTA.