Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2003 12:02 pm
by greg
droopypete wrote:First a correction, Greg said:
"look at Peter's SPOA - it has very minimal flex to avoid breaking other things"
The reason it has minimal flex is, it is stock other than SPOA, it is engineered with a 1.6L, 33" tyres and the spring over, and as I am planing to put a 2.0 l engine in, and get it aproved by the engineer I am not playing with the suspension yet.
...
mine has just a U bolt thickness below the axle tube, and before it had the spring pack, fish plates, U bolts, and nuts hanging down there, just waiting to snag me on a rock or slow me down trying to push it all through the mud.


sorry pete, i thought it was a "completed" setup...

as for solving the stuff hanging down below your axel tubing - that could be fairly simple - if you save 1" or clearance by going SPOA, just increase your tyre size by 2", that will equal the amount of clearance under the U bolts etc :D

Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2003 12:05 pm
by greg
love_mud wrote:OK .. I am a SPOA fan ..

Greg has already noticed alot of settling with his sporngs after just a few months of mostly weekend only stuff (pretty hardcore but still very limited kilometer wise)

Having owned and gone 4 wheeling as pilot of a Zuk thats been suspended many differnt ways on diffrent brand springs ... I had shitte loads of fun with all the setups ... guess thats what really matters ... :D


Correct on both accounts Guy (which is scarey ;) ), my springs are getting killed pretty quickly but i too am having a lot of fun - and indeed - that is what matters. :)