Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:47 pm
Is this kinda like a ADR approved line lockers? But using 4 inidivdual lines and cpu controlled.
cheers
cheers
Aussie Hardcore Wheelers
https://outerlimits4x4.com.au/
(1) you can turn it on and off as you need itshakes wrote:with a very limited understanding of this system, being very at risk of a massive flaming and adding a very unlikely theoretical situation I will ask...
could the system bring you unstuck on a descent by applying the brakes and causin the vehicle to unbalance and rollover?
Cheers
Simon
you know or you hope? I'm not dissing or anything but the chances of people leaving the system on full time are pretty high. and that'd be my biggest fear, even though now i've thought about it a bit more and being off throttle and compression braking during a reasonable descent throws my theory out the window and makes me look like a fool.(3) i doubt this could ever happen - the traction control would release the brakes before anything like that would happen.
OK, I am not an expert on the system by any means (Sam and Chuck who developed it were in the same LR club), but from my knowledge of the system and thinking logically...shakes wrote:you know or you hope? I'm not dissing or anything but the chances of people leaving the system on full time are pretty high. and that'd be my biggest fear, even though now i've thought about it a bit more and being off throttle and compression braking during a reasonable descent throws my theory out the window and makes me look like a fool.(3) i doubt this could ever happen - the traction control would release the brakes before anything like that would happen.
good call, but surely the brakes can be used to advantage. so keeping the engine running for brake boosters and the like would be good yeh.......but i dunno, so im not saying its the best idea, just a possibilityBeastmavster wrote:Dunno that full brakes would immobilize the car if someone inside was using full throttle.
Wouldnt do the engine and gearbox much good at the very least....
Did it get installed?Humpy wrote:Overkill is about to fit TC to my brothers GQ
frp88, this may help you!Strange Rover wrote:This is what I said in the last thread about traction control - and in terms of how well it works nothing has changed:
I guess the biggest question is how well does our electronic traction control work? Is it as good as lockers in terms of making a vehicle able to drive over stuff?
Let me state first off that in terms of getting the most amount of traction possible you can never do any better than a 100% locking differential.
So looking at hardcore type wheeling (like competition type stuff etc) - I would guess that in well over 90% of situations that requires twin lockers to get through you will get exactly the same result with our traction control. Now in the last 10% of situations you will definately notice that the traction control behaves differently to the lockers. The most common situation for me would be a steep rocky climb with offset ledges - something that you need to drive with throttle and momentum (whether lockers or ETC) - with the ETC you will start to notice the time delay and extra wheelspin that the traction control needs to operate. If the climb is difficult enough then you may find that a rig with lockers will be able to drive it and one with ETC wont. That being said I have never found an obstacle that I could drive with double lockers (ARB) that I couldnt drive totally open diffed with the traction control (this was back in the day when I ran ARB'd dana 44s as well as the traction control on the blue rover with 36in tyres and then 42in tyres)
These last 10% of situations are also the places that you really risk breaking something (like CVs or crownwheels for instance). The traction control is just so much easier on axle components. I would guess that an ARBed axle with 35in tyres would be about the same strength as a traction controlled axle with 42s - and Im totally serious on this point. The traction control is just that much easier on axles it isnt funny. Out of the hard core rigs that I wheel with that run hilux front CVs which is basically myself on 38s, Adrian on 38s and Rob on 42s that run front traction control compared with Tony on 38s and Beebee on 38s with front lockers the difference is amazing. Myself, Adrian and Rob drive the arse out of our rigs with absolutely no concern with front axle breakage and we rearly break CVs. Tony, who really drives carefully with his front locker breaks more CVs than the 3 of us combined and Beebee, who drives the arse out of his rig with his front locker breaks more than Tony again.
So it really depends on how strong your axles are. If you got axles that you carnt break then the lockers are the perfect choice - you could never do better than that but if you are worried about breaking stuff (particularly the front axle) and you find yourself turning off the front locker on the difficult throttling climbs or only use the front locker as an absolutely last resort then the traction control will probably make the rig more capable.
At the moment in my tube buggy which runs hilux limited slips and traction control (no lockers at all which is why its called the Lockless) there is nothing that this rig hasnt been able to drive that has been driven by Tony (twin lockers), Adrian (rear locker and front traction control) the Mogrover (twin lockers), Beebee (twin lockers), or Rob (rear locker and front traction control). In fact there is one new climb that so far only the Lockless had managed to drive and nobody else has. Tony has been out there a couple of times and he has broken both times and has yet to drive it. It took me a few tries to get it (cause its a bit offcamber) and I actually rolled completely over back onto my wheels before i drove it on my next attempt.
In the non hard core type wheeling, the sort of wheeling that you are going to do with your wife and kids in the car, I couldnt imagine there will be a situation where the traction control wont work as well as the lockers. It will probably work better because its totally automatic - you just turn it on and forget about it whether you are driving uphill, downhill, corning or on the flat. The traction control wont do a thing until you need it. The second big plus for this type of rig that again the traction control is just so much easier on the axles and CVs. And the traction control will fit any vehicle - its only the bracketry that will be different.
So if you are going to build a full on comp rig. Is the traction control something you should look at? I would say definately yes especially on the front axle. Most modern rear axles are strong enough to handle a rear locker so a locker there is the best way to go but in the front if you got some bigger tyres and reasonable horsepower then the traction control without a locker will probably make a better rig simple because you will be able to drive it harder without breaking it. On a full comp rig I probably wouldnt run it in the rear because there are times when the time delay of the traction control might slow you down - the lockless doesent have a rear locker and I do notice that its not locked although this hasnt ever stopped me driving anywhere that a rear locked rid has driven (like Tony or Adrian). Most modern rigs do have factory rear limited slip diffs and the traction control working on a limited slip diff is very, very close to a 100% locker. If you are running 35 spline cro mo shafts and CTMs on a Dana 60 then lockers will be best
Sam
It works perfect in Mud. Only 4 cars got to the 95 point mark in the mud run at Tuff Truck. First was Pete in his yellow 40 on 49s who cleared the 100, Dobbin on 44s and Matt Pasani on 46s got to the 95 point mark. I was the only other vehicle to get to the 95 Point mark NO LOCKERS. Traction Control Only with LSDs both ends. And 37" BFG KRAWLERS. Even the Mog on 42s with Lockers only got to the 90.frp88 wrote:SAM YOU KEEP SAYING ABOUT THE FRONT AXELS BREAKING AND THE CV'S BUT YOU ARE ONLY RUNNING LITTLE LUX AXELS YOU CANT TELL ME THAT YOU HAVE BROKEN THE 404'S HAVE YOUMY OTHER QUESTION IS HOW IS IT IN THE MUD
I MEAN THE SENSORS COS EVERY NOW AND THEN ALL OFF US I A QUICK DIP
BUT I COULD NOT SEEN A LOCKER BEING BETTER OM ROCK WERE WHEEL POSI AND STEERING IS SO IMPORTANT
ooowww my ears....frp88 wrote:SAM YOU KEEP SAYING ABOUT THE FRONT AXELS BREAKING AND THE CV'S BUT YOU ARE ONLY RUNNING LITTLE LUX AXELS YOU CANT TELL ME THAT YOU HAVE BROKEN THE 404'S HAVE YOUMY OTHER QUESTION IS HOW IS IT IN THE MUD
I MEAN THE SENSORS COS EVERY NOW AND THEN ALL OFF US I A QUICK DIP
BUT I COULD NOT SEEN A LOCKER BEING BETTER OM ROCK WERE WHEEL POSI AND STEERING IS SO IMPORTANT
I wasnt in my Buggy at Tuff Truck. I was driving the Orange Defender. You wont miss it in the mud. Oh yeah and the only reason i gave up was because the front diff let loose. It was a bad gear set up not caused in any part by the Traction Control.frp88 wrote:YES YES is that better and dvd iam getting as b/present so i have to wait another 10 days i hope it a longer one than the 2002 one it was only 70minutes but thats 4wdmonthly for ya did finale cut do ittony i have see who good your buggy is on a no. off downloads while playing at the big "O" i've got double diff lock in the middy if i trade the falcon in on 100 series i think you t/c would be more than enough for it also easyer for my wife too use if stuck flick switch
so the price is
Try contacting strange rover off this boardwhiteknight wrote:are there any prices yet?
Looking at $2800 installed by us (Haultech)whiteknight wrote:are there any prices yet?
Thats interestingStrange Rover wrote:
Looking at $2800 installed by us (Haultech)
Sam
Like I said - installed by us.Humpy wrote:Thats interestingStrange Rover wrote:
Looking at $2800 installed by us (Haultech)
Sam
Sam Keck (overkill) has bumped his price from $2750 for my brother to $3500 quoted for my dads lux, apparently because Haultech are using better components now