Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 9:18 pm
They sure look like american numberplates... california perhaps
Outer Limits 4x4 Board
Aussie Hardcore Wheelers
https://outerlimits4x4.com.au/
Post your hardcore GQ pics here
Page 2 of 4
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 9:35 pm
Yes one of the plates does look a little like a Cali plate but i doubt it as they both have the panhard rod and steering links running to the RH/side of the car so they are more than likely not US trucks.
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:28 am
Possibly Iceland
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:44 am
grimbo wrote:bj on roids wrote:STFU I knew the BJwagon would rear its ugly rusted head
yes but now we can unveil the Bj wagon already for XRCC
ROFLMAO
thats GOLD, you've got SKILLZ
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:46 am
RUFF wrote:Those GQ's and 80 series cruisers are im guessing actually from Japan. They are RH drive. The US didnt get the GQ localy.
Ruff is right they are JAP
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2003 2:27 pm
I'd better fly to japan and purchase one of them monsters ! 
Transporting them to australia would be difficult, would not fit in containers !
Transporting them to australia would be difficult, would not fit in containers !
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2003 3:04 pm
Why not just build one here? Don't know what you'd do with it though......
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2003 5:31 pm
getdirty wrote:Why not just build one here? Don't know what you'd do with it though......
drive over yours
Imagine the looks driving through Toorak or Rose Bay or the Cross on a Friday/Saturday night!!!
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2003 6:49 am
It would entertain you two forever more as you both tell him it cannot be engineered, and why, but give micheal a call, he will work with you. 
Those trucks are bolt-on bandits anyways.
Those trucks are bolt-on bandits anyways.
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2003 6:55 am
Hmmm
Not too many pics in here, only Chat
bazzle
Not too many pics in here, only Chat
bazzle
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2004 12:11 am
Had to birng the topic back from the dead
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2004 9:45 pm
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2004 9:55 pm
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2004 9:55 pm
N*A*M wrote:sweet. thanks carlton! i saw skeletonfeet the other day when i was searching for gq pics.
I don't get it, why is he skeletonfeet?
Flying GQ at stockton in 2003
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 11:43 am
I didn't know that 4wds can fly, but with enough speed it can HEHEHE
not to mention my uncle managed to destory $1500 worth of my truck.
And some other photos
if shannon,monty or carter read this don't bother replying cause i know what your going to say
not to mention my uncle managed to destory $1500 worth of my truck.
And some other photos
if shannon,monty or carter read this don't bother replying cause i know what your going to say
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 1:17 pm
mine
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 2:34 pm
hottiemonster wrote:mine
There not really hardcore. well the second one isn't (the first though nice puddle - I can understand why it took a while to get out). Just dirty, you really should wash it.
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 2:55 pm
MQ080 wrote:N*A*M wrote:sweet. thanks carlton! i saw skeletonfeet the other day when i was searching for gq pics.
I don't get it, why is he skeletonfeet?
look at his skeleton feet!
Re: Flying GQ at stockton in 2003
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
mwhitfield_2000 wrote:I didn't know that 4wds can fly, but with enough speed it can HEHEHE
not to mention my uncle managed to destory $1500 worth of my truck.
Man, what an opportunity to lean out the window and get a really good measurement of how much droop your suspension has all around!
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:31 pm
turps wrote:hottiemonster wrote:mine
There not really hardcore. well the second one isn't (the first though nice puddle - I can understand why it took a while to get out). Just dirty, you really should wash it.
that photo was the one that was easiet to get out, just a snatch from behind with the hilux. the other was the hard one casue the whole undercarriage was stuck and the other car had trouble pulling me out from the rear so we decided to try the front and it worked better.
i did wash it on sunday after noon after work.
$12 at car wash to get thick mud off.
Home with the high pressure again.
then wash with sponge.
change tires and put cheeze cutters back on
wash JTs and put them away
clean snatch
and its all good.
if the second pic isnt hardcore, what about dirtpigs pic of him doing nothing either. sorry it had to be said.
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 9:02 pm
hottiemonster wrote:if the second pic isnt hardcore, what about dirtpigs pic of him doing nothing either. sorry it had to be said.
Have a look at Dirtpigs second photo tell me thats not doing it tough, check the travel.
Winner by long shot is mwhitfield_2000
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:59 am
bogged wrote:hottiemonster wrote:if the second pic isnt hardcore, what about dirtpigs pic of him doing nothing either. sorry it had to be said.
Have a look at Dirtpigs second photo tell me thats not doing it tough, check the travel.
Winner by long shot is mwhitfield_2000
dirt pigs second pic is fine, but the first is nothing.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 7:38 am
hottiemonster wrote:bogged wrote:hottiemonster wrote:if the second pic isnt hardcore, what about dirtpigs pic of him doing nothing either. sorry it had to be said.
Have a look at Dirtpigs second photo tell me thats not doing it tough, check the travel.
Winner by long shot is mwhitfield_2000
dirt pigs second pic is fine, but the first is nothing.
Still gives me a fat everytime I see it
Not your average maller GQ and quite a few guys have commented that they like that shot. If it would please you, I'll find a few more hardcore piccys for you.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 7:46 am
hottiemonster wrote:if the second pic isnt hardcore, what about dirtpigs pic of him doing nothing either. sorry it had to be said.
hottiemonster wrote:dirt pigs second pic is fine, but the first is nothing
Well if JKs rig doesn't cut the mustard, how about this monster
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 7:50 am
Shorty40 wrote:hottiemonster wrote:if the second pic isnt hardcore, what about dirtpigs pic of him doing nothing either. sorry it had to be said.hottiemonster wrote:dirt pigs second pic is fine, but the first is nothing
Well if JKs rig doesn't cut the mustard, how about this monster
He he... but it's one hell of a comfy tow rig
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 8:00 am
This is the Patrol i talk of in another topic, it has a Whipple-supercharged 502, TH400 tranny and other mods, and the original A/C and accesories work perfectly.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 8:39 am
pato castro wrote:This is the Patrol i talk of in another topic, it has a Whipple-supercharged 502, TH400 tranny and other mods, and the original A/C and accesories work perfectly.
very nice, how much kw?
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 8:49 am
hottiemonster wrote:very nice, how much kw?
About 355 kw's, but it has about 750 lb/ft of torque at 2800 rpm, don't know how much NM's are.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:04 pm
I was speaking to Cheezy yesterday, he had the Mav on the Dyno and with jets that were too small it still pulled over 800Nm of torque and I think it was around 385kW at the rear wheels. Can't imgaine how much that would be at the flywheel cos that figure is after the frictional losses of a TH400, twin transfer cases and the H260 diff. So there is a fair bit of drag there.
and I think it was around 385kW at the rear wheels. Can't imgaine how much that would be at the flywheel cos that figure is after the frictional losses of a TH400, twin transfer cases and the H260 diff. So there is a fair bit of drag there.Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:51 pm
MKPatrolGuy wrote:I was speaking to Cheezy yesterday, he had the Mav on the Dyno and with jets that were too small it still pulled over 800Nm of torque
cheezy has one powerful rig there!