Page 2 of 3

Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 7:13 pm
by grazza
Probably look better, and a lot less illegal, if the spotties were on each side of the centre piece and not on top of the bar, blocking his view :roll:

New c.racing gq w.bar

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:16 pm
by 355G60
Hay mudmav these guys down at cheezy racing make there bread and butter out of building and suppying this stuff to the public u should watch your mouth about what u say about people's products in front of so many people if u reckon u could do a better job lets see it. i just put 1 of these bars on my mav. and all my mates and other guys ive seen that 4x4 thought it looked spot on with plenty of strength. dont u have any thing better to do champ? get a life!

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 9:25 pm
by wrksux
Mate calm down, all mudmav was saying is he thinks its an ugly bar, he never said it was poorly built or anything, only that he didnt find it athesicly pleaseing.

Re: New c.racing gq w.bar

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:09 pm
by GU BUG
355G60 wrote:Hay mudmav these guys down at cheezy racing make there bread and butter out of building and suppying this stuff to the public u should watch your mouth about what u say about people's products in front of so many people if u reckon u could do a better job lets see it. i just put 1 of these bars on my mav. and all my mates and other guys ive seen that 4x4 thought it looked spot on with plenty of strength. dont u have any thing better to do champ? get a life!
Settle down mate. I agree with mudmav, that thing looks SHITHOUSE :armsup:.

We all know Cheezy is excellent at what he does but I must say, that bar looks pretty ordinary :?. I think the extra bar work he's put on it protrudes too high & comes out too wide. Checkout Andrews bar from On Track 4X4 . I think it looks a lot neater & I'm sure cheezy doesn't mind a little criticism :D.

Opinions are like arseholes....everyone's got one ;)Image

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:18 am
by mudmav
thanks guys i am not saying that cheezy doesn't make good stuff ive watched comp guys run into tree stumps at 40ks an hour and bend everything but cheezy's bar, but i was just making a point that the thing LOOKS SHITHOUSE, if you want protection for your grill and lights and you can handle having something that looks like that then good for you, you will prob never smash a light or a grill, but i couldnt live with that hanging off the front of my rig. VIRGIL HATER OUT

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:21 am
by mudmav
cassers bar on the other hand serves the same purpose and i no they are strong as a mother F*&ker, And allthough i still prefer his bar without the light and grill protection, i could live with it if i cared about the extra protection, but like i said if your happy with your cheezy bar then im chuffed for you.

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:53 am
by moose
i,ve seen the cheezy bar up close , it looks a lil' bit funky , but he is working from the original design , & trying to keep it legal !!!
the pic of the 1 with the lights on top , they are actually in the aerial mount locations !!!

as for OnTracks bar , legally , you cannot see the parker or indicator from the front of the vechile !!! :?

So.......... being pretty or legal ??? which way do you go !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:40 am
by mudmav
this legal smegal crap, i think if we were all realistic, we would understand that if we got a copper or a vicroads officer that new anythign about 4wds or the adr's that 99% of us would not pass a roadworthy or be legal. And yes im ready to get flamed.

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:48 pm
by MKPatrolGuy
mudmav wrote:this legal smegal crap, i think if we were all realistic, we would understand that if we got a copper or a vicroads officer that new anythign about 4wds or the adr's that 99% of us would not pass a roadworthy or be legal. And yes im ready to get flamed.
I agree about not passing a roady, but the less attention you get as the cop drives past, the better.

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:54 pm
by GU BUG
moose wrote:i,ve seen the cheezy bar up close , it looks a lil' bit funky , but he is working from the original design , & trying to keep it legal !!!
the pic of the 1 with the lights on top , they are actually in the aerial mount locations !!!

as for OnTracks bar , legally , you cannot see the parker or indicator from the front of the vechile !!! :?

So.......... being pretty or legal ??? which way do you go !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D
The Cheezy bar wouldn't be legal either with those recovery points hang'n out the front of it :?.

Also, I think there's a law that states a bullbar must meet ASNZ standards & therefor would have to be a registered product or some crap like that :armsup:....if you know what I mean :?

As for the statement of not drawing a coppers attention as he drives bye, I'd think that cheezy thing hang'n off the front of your rig would draw more attention than the hot pink duco :lol:

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:31 pm
by marin
Off the topic a bit, how recent is that picture of the green GQ, 'cauz i notice it has twin motors on the high mount :twisted: :twisted:

marin

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:14 pm
by HellfisH
mudmav wrote:this legal smegal crap, i think if we were all realistic, we would understand that if we got a copper or a vicroads officer that new anythign about 4wds or the adr's that 99% of us would not pass a roadworthy or be legal. And yes im ready to get flamed.
I had a roadworthy a couple of months ago, then took my rig to Vic roads, the guy looked over it and said "looks good mate no probs" ;) :lol:
Image

Like moose, i've seen it up close, and i like it. Ok maybe its not for everyone, but to call someones hard work a "atrocity" is a bit F#%KING rude don't ya think :finger:

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:08 pm
by 355G60
look mudmav i never stated u guys said the bar was built poorley i just added they were strong i just think the way u went about bagging the bar was a bit full on!

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:10 pm
by GU BUG
marin wrote:Off the topic a bit, how recent is that picture of the green GQ, 'cauz i notice it has twin motors on the high mount :twisted: :twisted:

marin
A couple of months :?........

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:18 pm
by 355G60
gu bug on traks bar. its outer hoops r out around as far as my bar by the looks of it its neally the same apart from some sharper bends on the top corner. The center and the center hoop look the same and my opinion would b there bar has to much bar work on it but im not gona go callen it a god dam ugly lookn peice of steel!

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:38 pm
by GU BUG
355G60 wrote:gu bug on traks bar. its outer hoops r out around as far as my bar by the looks of it its neally the same apart from some sharper bends on the top corner. The center and the center hoop look the same and my opinion would b there bar has to much bar work on it but im not gona go callen it a god dam ugly lookn peice of steel!
What ever the difference is, it still looks better than the Cheezy bar & that extra bar work is for extra strength/bracing & if you think it's ugly, go ahead & say so :?.

Don't be scared to say your piece, I've said mine :armsup:!!!

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:49 pm
by bogged
YankeeDave wrote:
mudmav wrote:just looked at cheezys web site. Their is a pic of a white maverick with this bar fitted and it is quite possibly the most ugly looking piece of metal i have ever seen hanging off the front of a gq
x2
My god.. Someone put that out of its misery!

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:50 pm
by bogged
beretta wrote:Reminds me of Virgil off the Thunderbirds, looks a lot like his glasses on a GQ.
You mean Brains?
Image

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:56 pm
by GU BUG
bogged wrote:
beretta wrote:Reminds me of Virgil off the Thunderbirds, looks a lot like his glasses on a GQ.
You mean Brains?
Image
:lol:.....THAT'S GOLD!!!

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 7:24 am
by moose
well if we all looked really close at the ontrack bar & a standard cheezy bar , you might all notice something !!!!
that,s if you can get your heads out of ya bumms !!!!

der , the centre & the hoops are identical !!!!!
minor cosmetic difference on the Ontrack !!!

those that are bagging everything , lets see your designs & finished product & sales figures !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 8:22 am
by Wendle
settle down guys.
the cheezy product on the white car only looks a bit odd because it is out of context. the car is sitting very low and the tyres are too small to make the barwork look in proportion.

everyone wet themselves when they saw it on the black truck, then bagged it out when they saw it on the white truck. it's the same piece of steel! :lol:

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:27 am
by mudmav
nah i still dont like it on the black truck either. Sometimes this forum makes me piss my pants. What i mean cant a few grown men state their opinion without it turning into a womens meeting afterwards. On a brighter note that picture of virgil is a pisser. Can comeone post it directly below the cheezy bar pic from the white patrol, now that would be funny

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:28 am
by mudmav
its funny coz cheezy doesnt seem to give a stuff what i say about his bar but all you blokes do. I think if anyone has the right to crack the shits its him and only him

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:58 am
by beretta
This place is too funny sometimes, great to see so much passion about Cheezy's products, even if half of it is just bitchy shite, but people are entitled to their opinions and this is a "forum" remember.

For the record I actually like this style of bar, i wasn't bagging the actual product when I mentioned Virgil, just the way it looked on that white thing, I was sussing out one similar out on Kris Richters truck at the Pirahna Pursuit and it looked cool on a bigger truck and I would run one for sure.

I don't know Cheezy myself but judging by what I've seen of him, he himself probably thinks this thread is pretty funny, good publicity for his product anyway, most people off here will certainly know or remember the product after all the back and forth about it.

Stay :cool: mudmav ;)

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:11 pm
by turps
I am not a fan of either. I think if the center hoop was abit higher. Then where the top part of the wing pieces come in it would look better.
Out of the 2 I would go the Ontrack version.
But as Moose said there the same centers. Just that Ontrack manufacture the rest abit differently.
Also from what I have seen they both lack abit of strengh in the wing area (campared to ARB). But that may have changed as I havent seen one for awhile.
As for the twinmotors on SHREQ, been there for nearly 12mths. I also think GQhoon and Birdy are running the same setup.

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:38 pm
by sierrajim
The Cheezy bar wouldn't be legal either with those recovery points hang'n out the front of it
They're removable.

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:39 pm
by GU BUG
moose wrote:well if we all looked really close at the ontrack bar & a standard cheezy bar , you might all notice something !!!!
that,s if you can get your heads out of ya bumms !!!!

der , the centre & the hoops are identical !!!!!
minor cosmetic difference on the Ontrack !!!

those that are bagging everything , lets see your designs & finished product & sales figures !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D
Well if you got your head out of YOUR ARSE :roll:, you'd notice that what ever the difference is....it's different & in my opinion looks better than the Cheezy one :finger:.

This thread is getting old & boring, let's argue about something else :armsup:

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:38 pm
by ljxtreem
Blah Blah Blah Blah :finger:
If you like it buy it
If you dont, STFKU
And if you think you can do better draw us a picture with your crayons, and show us what it "would" look like....


Mock :D

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:24 am
by mudmav
can we do th is more often guys its fun

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:26 am
by mudmav
its got to the point i have people pm me to tell me im a wanker, now thats funny stuff. Who would of thought that one opinionated person could cause so much trouble LOL :D :!: :!: