Page 2 of 2

...

Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 11:05 am
by JemmyBubbles
I am with the previous posts, most likely a freakish batch. I am sorry they were being pricks about changing over $$$.

@ 10000km's I am having np's with the 35"MTRS on my GQ shorty. 32psi on hwy and have had them down to 10psi on teh rocky stuff. THey seem to be wearing quite well ie; barely negligble

Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 5:00 pm
by Jeeps
I had the same problems with BFG AT's giving me bad vibrations so i won't go back to them anymore.

My MTR's have about 10k on them and they still look like they're brand new and drive better than the HT's and BFG AT's i used to run.

I reckon a lot of landcruiser/patrol/pajero owners forget they drive the biggest/heaviest vehicle on the road (apart from needing a truck licence) so it's gonna be harder on tyres and other parts than most other vehicles.

Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 5:37 pm
by dirtyGQ
i got 80,000 out of my mtr's great i thought but they grip nothing like my new kumho's or even my ast set of claws.

Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 5:56 pm
by bradley
Whats that?? :?: [/b][/u][/quote]

As already stated, 4 psi difference cold to hot.

There used to be a really good rundown on it on the sime tyres website, you could check if it is still there. well worth a read.

cheers Brad.

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:48 am
by BundyRumandCoke
You can always tell the world what you think of them, the same way I tell the world what I think of Kumho tyres.

You will just have to wait for the pic to see.