Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 6:07 pm
by Slunnie
Why do you say that?

6.5turbo would be nice in the D2.

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 6:22 pm
by stuee
Before my old boy sold me his disco he got a quote from brunswick and they said the biggest they would fit into a disco was the 6.2 as the 6.5 and 6.5td were to big an even then i think the conversion was still around the $12000 mark. IMO I'd rather sell the v8 then buy a tdi when your looking at that much to put in a underpowered lump of iron in the front.

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 6:41 pm
by 6.5 rangie
Before my old boy sold me his disco he got a quote from brunswick and they said the biggest they would fit into a disco was the 6.2 as the 6.5 and 6.5td were to big an even then i think the conversion was still around the $12000 mark. IMO I'd rather sell the v8 then buy a tdi when your looking at that much to put in a underpowered lump of iron in the front.

As far as i know they are the same motor just different displacement.

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 6:53 pm
by stuee
6.5 rangie wrote:
Before my old boy sold me his disco he got a quote from brunswick and they said the biggest they would fit into a disco was the 6.2 as the 6.5 and 6.5td were to big an even then i think the conversion was still around the $12000 mark. IMO I'd rather sell the v8 then buy a tdi when your looking at that much to put in a underpowered lump of iron in the front.

As far as i know they are the same motor just different displacement.
I would not be suprised at all if thats the case, would make sense wouldn't it. But I'm quite sure the turbo is located at the rear which would still mean a custom set up wouldn't it???

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:25 pm
by Rangie ute on 38''
there isnt much difference between the two it mainly comes down to the heads and piston change for turbo, but they are a big lump of shit for 100 hp (6.2). previous owner had the reciepts for $14,500 from brunswick diesel, :shock: :shock: ,

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 8:09 pm
by 6.5 rangie
there isnt much difference between the two it mainly comes down to the heads and piston change for turbo, but they are a big lump of shit for 100 hp (6.2).
If i remeber correctly, awhile ago you posted that you wish you'd never got rid of yours ;) [/quote]

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 8:11 pm
by 6.5 rangie
I would not be suprised at all if thats the case, would make sense wouldn't it. But I'm quite sure the turbo is located at the rear which would still mean a custom set up wouldn't it???
Turbo is also side mount and it does fit easily

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:21 am
by cloughy
6.5 rangie wrote:
I would not be suprised at all if thats the case, would make sense wouldn't it. But I'm quite sure the turbo is located at the rear which would still mean a custom set up wouldn't it???
Turbo is also side mount and it does fit easily
Pics in a rangie please, there is fuck all room to put a turbo on, comfortably anyway, if you show me a good placing for it i'll turbo mine

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:23 am
by cloughy
Slunnie wrote:Why do you say that?

6.5turbo would be nice in the D2.
EFI 6.2 turbo would be nice, but the others are a bit agricultural and for the price tag they are a bit rich,

Diesel engine conversion for my Disco?

Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:54 pm
by CycloneTracy
Have any of you lot seen what is available for the 6.2/6.5 V8 T/D Stateside? Exhaust brake kits,nitrous, the whole deal!

Diesel engine conversion for my Disco?

Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 7:00 pm
by CycloneTracy
I also saw some photo's not so long ago in one of the 4X4 Trader magazines with the late model 6.5 Turbo engine, and the turbo's were rear mounted. I got told that side mounted turbo's wouldn't fit into Range Rovers. Does fitting a side mount turbo engine involve a body lift?

Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 7:56 pm
by 6.5 rangie
My motor came with a turbo and manifold, when i installed it i bolted the turbo and manifold on and it fitted (side mount) but was advised not to run it due to heat and the possibility of cracking the heads, but i think in the future i will put it on.
I'd bolt it on to show you but its a lot of work i could be doing somewhere else, if i have to pull the manifold i'll put it on.
Damien

Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 9:21 pm
by cloughy
6.5 rangie wrote:My motor came with a turbo and manifold, when i installed it i bolted the turbo and manifold on and it fitted (side mount) but was advised not to run it due to heat and the possibility of cracking the heads, but i think in the future i will put it on.
I'd bolt it on to show you but its a lot of work i could be doing somewhere else, if i have to pull the manifold i'll put it on.
Damien
Wanna lend your manifold and turbo for a while ;) , i'm thinking and eaton M90 for mine, but at a later date gotta finish my other one

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:51 pm
by paulm
i have a 6.2 in a hj45 tray with 35s and there is as much power as I would ever need.they are a good motor in the bush.having owned rangies for 20 yrs i believe they would be an ideal swap regarding diff ratios etc.if your after a touring 4x4 the motors are loud but i have no sound deadening in the truck.another advantage is that they are mechanical with only 4 wires connected to the motor.you can obtain fitting kits with ease in aust.and they are relatively cheap to rebuild except for injectors because you now have 8 at $120.disadvantages are the weight and i found very hard to get insurance,even bomb insurance

Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:29 pm
by cooter
i'll have 2 4bt - a 120hp cummins bolted to turbo350s in the country in august bout 5500 asking price low hour motors big torque figures