Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Difference between 200TDi & 300TDi???

Tech Talk for Rover owners.

Moderator: Micka

Posts: 687
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 9:54 am
Location: Sydney

Post by up2nogood »

Nah, that's for the entire tensioner assy (arm with spring and pulley) and the a/c pulley assy. Not just the bearings!
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 11:55 pm

Post by jungle_surfer »

When was the 200 made, and when was the 300 made?
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:50 pm

Post by Nonimouse »

I am lucky enough to have one of each engine in my two RRC's

The 200Tdi is in a manual '87 four door and was a factory retro. It runs about 150bhp and not far off 300ft/lb. Pump tuning, mahoosive 'cooler, hi-flow exhaust, up graded injectors blah blah blah. It has done about 40K miles in this tune and sees a bout 35mpg average

The 300Tdi is in a '93 auto and is also a factory retrofit with a mere 39K miles on the clock. It runs about 145bhp and abou 285ft/lb. Pump tweeks, exhaust, twin coolers and a modded turbo... It gets about 30mpg on average

I work on Tdi's more than any other engine, in Defnder, Disco and RRC and I would say that a 200 has the edge in standard form and in reliability. But only just - they are both damn good engines.

By the way I don't think LR were telling the truth in the performance figures. Having blown all those bucks on modding the 300, they needed justification. If you compare a bog standard 200 with a bog 300, the 200 always has a bit more grunt and a bit more ooomf
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests