Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:39 pm
by ludacris
GU 4.5 auto 3.9 ratios and 35"s. On fraser we drove most of the time in high4 easily. Occasionally put it in low but not very often. I think the 83 reduction is overkill especially with 33's to 35's.

LudaCris

Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 8:05 pm
by maverick01
i have a GQ running 35s with 4.11 diff gears with after market turboa nd im wondering what percentage reduction gears would be best for my trucka dn im thinking of 43%

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 7:42 am
by turbo gu
What sort of driving do you do?? If its slow stuff eg rocks that are fairly technically go 83% if its mud or alot of sand only go 45% at most

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 4:19 pm
by maverick01
Most of my driving is rock and steep declines and i do the occasional mud runs here and there and bugger all sand driving

I have spoken to a fair few people in brisbane and most guys recommend 43% as the 83s are too slow

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 5:28 pm
by matto
why cant you get 83% and if its to low put it in 2nd if they are the same price i would go 83%, if 150% was available i would go that why would you pay big money to return the gearing back to standard when you have a chance to have a better low range?

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 5:58 pm
by maverick01
yea i thought about that but apparently 85s are too low for mud driving or sand driving and i dont do much of either but if i have to then i will

A mate runs 43% gears on 37s and reckons that is sufficient but im only running 35s

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 6:08 pm
by matto
if its to low put it in high range

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 8:13 pm
by bigbluemav
matto wrote:why cant you get 83% and if its to low put it in 2nd if they are the same price i would go 83%, if 150% was available i would go that why would you pay big money to return the gearing back to standard when you have a chance to have a better low range?
100% agree!!

I had the 85% Mark's gears in the Mav'. For rocks it was GREAT, no need to slip clutch at all!! If it's too low, CHANGE GEARS, you've got 5!!

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 9:39 am
by raptorthumper
That's my opinion as well. 5th gear low range in my manual can spin the wheels over 50km/hr with a good rev with the 83% (3.74 : 1 red).

If you need to spin the wheels faster than that, then i dont think you should be in low range anyway. If you are doing mud then select 1st high range.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 10:45 am
by bogged
matto wrote:if its to low put it in high range
then spend all day changing from high to low and back.. fawk that.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 1:58 pm
by lukethedork
bogged wrote:
matto wrote:if its to low put it in high range
then spend all day changing from high to low and back.. fawk that.
Your right, because it's so hard and takes so long to change from high to low... :roll:

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 3:28 pm
by SIM79
matto wrote:if its to low put it in high range
High range is to high for soft sand. :D

lukethedork wrote:
bogged wrote:
matto wrote:if its to low put it in high range
then spend all day changing from high to low and back.. fawk that.
Your right, because it's so hard and takes so long to change from high to low... :roll:
When your with big group of 4x4s its very annoying waiting for someone changing from low to high all the time.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 4:38 pm
by bigbluemav
SIM79 wrote:
matto wrote:if its to low put it in high range
High range is to high for soft sand. :D

lukethedork wrote:
bogged wrote:
matto wrote:if its to low put it in high range
then spend all day changing from high to low and back.. fawk that.
Your right, because it's so hard and takes so long to change from high to low... :roll:
When your with big group of 4x4s its very annoying waiting for someone changing from low to high all the time.
Then let some air out of your tyres!!!! :finger: :finger: :finger:

And HTFU!!! :finger: :finger: :D :D

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 5:06 pm
by SIM79
bigbluemav wrote:
SIM79 wrote:
matto wrote:if its to low put it in high range
High range is to high for soft sand. :D

lukethedork wrote:
bogged wrote:
matto wrote:if its to low put it in high range
then spend all day changing from high to low and back.. fawk that.
Your right, because it's so hard and takes so long to change from high to low... :roll:
When your with big group of 4x4s its very annoying waiting for someone changing from low to high all the time.
Then let some air out of your tyres!!!! :finger: :finger: :finger:

And HTFU!!! :finger: :finger: :D :D
:finger: I run 14psi in sand :finger:

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 5:13 pm
by lukethedork
SIM79 wrote:
bigbluemav wrote:
SIM79 wrote:
matto wrote:if its to low put it in high range
High range is to high for soft sand. :D

lukethedork wrote:
bogged wrote:then spend all day changing from high to low and back.. fawk that.
Your right, because it's so hard and takes so long to change from high to low... :roll:
When your with big group of 4x4s its very annoying waiting for someone changing from low to high all the time.
Then let some air out of your tyres!!!! :finger: :finger: :finger:

And HTFU!!! :finger: :finger: :D :D
:finger: I run 14psi in sand :finger:
I'll repeat what bigbluemav said. Let some air out of your tyres!!!! 14psi isn't low.

I don't know how long it takes a retard to change from low to high, but it takes me a matter of seconds and no body has ever had to 'wait' for me to switch between either...

Luke.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 5:19 pm
by bogged
lukethedork wrote:
bogged wrote:
matto wrote:if its to low put it in high range
then spend all day changing from high to low and back.. fawk that.
Your right, because it's so hard and takes so long to change from high to low... :roll:
So you agree with me, good to see. :cool:
Its totally dependant on the type of driving you do...
if 1/2 the convoy has 83% and the rest have nothing, its fuckin crap... some tool with his rockhoppers is doing 2kph @ 20,000000 rpm in 5th while everyone else is rammed up their arse in normal low then end up stuck cause they are wantin to drive.

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 5:46 pm
by SIM79
lukethedork wrote:
SIM79 wrote:
bigbluemav wrote:
SIM79 wrote:
matto wrote:if its to low put it in high range
High range is to high for soft sand. :D

lukethedork wrote: Your right, because it's so hard and takes so long to change from high to low... :roll:
When your with big group of 4x4s its very annoying waiting for someone changing from low to high all the time.
Then let some air out of your tyres!!!! :finger: :finger: :finger:

And HTFU!!! :finger: :finger: :D :D
:finger: I run 14psi in sand :finger:
I'll repeat what bigbluemav said. Let some air out of your tyres!!!! 14psi isn't low.

I don't know how long it takes a retard to change from low to high, but it takes me a matter of seconds and no body has ever had to 'wait' for me to switch between either...

Luke.
14 psi isn't low but my MTZs bag out heaps at 14psi so there' s no need to go lower.

Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 9:16 pm
by str8up
Which reduction gears do you guys recommend for a gu patrol ute with LS1 and commodore auto? I was leaning towards 85% because of the commodores first gear???

Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 9:19 pm
by raptorthumper
SIM79 wrote: High range is to high for soft sand. :D

Get yourself some horsepower and you will never want low range in the sand.

And if you are getting stuck in soft sand at 14psi tyre pressure then :finger: GET SOME MORE HORSEPOWER. :finger:

:D :D

Image

Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 9:57 am
by SIM79
raptorthumper wrote:
SIM79 wrote: High range is to high for soft sand. :D

Get yourself some horsepower and you will never want low range in the sand.

And if you are getting stuck in soft sand at 14psi tyre pressure then :finger: GET SOME MORE HORSEPOWER. :finger:
I have never been bogged is sand :finger:

85% seems like a lot hastle for soft sand if you need heaps of horsepower and tyre running less than 14psi.

Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 6:38 pm
by brad-chevlux
i've got stock size tyres on my GQ, in the soft sand that i drive i'm never higher then 3rd low, I'm building a case with 83% gears, i figure that will put me in 5th low on the same stuff.
i already use high range on hard packed wet sand and low 2nd or 3rd in mud.

i can't see how anyone thinks 83% is too low when running larger tyres.

first low on 31s isn't low enough, why would you fit bigger tyres and then return the overall gearing back to stock?