Page 2 of 2

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 1:59 pm
by Bad JuJu
U know you are bored at work....

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 11:11 am
by Red_Zook
ok mine is realy out of wack...
standard 5spd Nt if that makes any diffrence.. 1ltr x-fer and 4.5 toys? what is my ratio or how are you guys working this out?
oh yeah and i have 33's on the way :armsup: :armsup: :armsup: :armsup: :armsup: :armsup: :armsup: :armsup:

Hi-lux SPLIT RIMS ROCK

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 12:42 pm
by munga
just read what others have posted regarding ratios. :roll:
i only posted a reply for gutless, coz i had found the vit ratios the same day he asked.
everyone else reads the thread and gets out their calculator/abacus/excel/stick-in-sand/pen-and-paper and works it out.


crawl ratio = gearbox 1st gear x transfer gear low ratio x diff ratio

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 9:24 pm
by Bad JuJu
But I want to know my speedo out of whackness, I think it is 25% (ish)

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 10:26 pm
by munga
Bad JuJu, if the s3 brings your high range down 21%, and the 32" tyres take it up 23%, then your speedo should be about 2% out of whack.

on standard tyres, when your speedo reads 100km/h, youre actually doing 79km/h

then you put on your 23% larger, 32.6" tyres, and youre doing 102km/h

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 12:52 am
by CAP51Z
anyone wanna have a crack at this for me, best i can figure is 109% accurate speedo, with crawl of 119.65:1 :cool: . (going by 5.29's being 9% lower than 5.12's, running 36"s) Would this be correct? :lol:

NT Speedo Cable & Cluster,
3.48:1 Gemini 1st gear,
6.5:1 Xfer
5.29:1 Diff
36" Tyres

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 4:45 pm
by Bad JuJu
munga wrote:Bad JuJu, if the s3 brings your high range down 21%, and the 32" tyres take it up 23%, then your speedo should be about 2% out of whack.

on standard tyres, when your speedo reads 100km/h, youre actually doing 79km/h

then you put on your 23% larger, 32.6" tyres, and youre doing 102km/h
The reason I asked is cause at 80km/h on the speedo, gps says im doing 101km/h

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 9:40 am
by ofr57
3.652 x 6.50 x 5.125 = 121.65725

only dreams are made of :D

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 10:00 am
by ZOOK60
ofr57 wrote:3.652 x 6.50 x 5.125 = 121.65725

only dreams are made of :D
Ive got 3.652 x 1.816 x 5.1 x 4.1 = 138.67578912

try this program http://www.4lo.com/calc/gearratio.htm

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 11:19 am
by CAP51Z
ofr57 wrote:3.652 x 6.50 x 5.125 = 121.65725

only dreams are made of :D
i recall someone saying anything over 100 crawl ratio is useless. Im starting to agree with them. I like the 119.6 on off camber stuff, but as i found out on real steep rocks its too slow. & whats worse, 2nd isnt low enough to give me the control i want. So im gonna change from 5.29s to 4.56s, coming down to 103.15. im hoping this will work out nicely...

if it doesnt, i get 16% better economy, & 16% more top end, so it wont be a total loss.

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 2:10 pm
by ZOOK60
CAP51Z wrote:
ofr57 wrote:3.652 x 6.50 x 5.125 = 121.65725

only dreams are made of :D
i recall someone saying anything over 100 crawl ratio is useless. Im starting to agree with them. I like the 119.6 on off camber stuff, but as i found out on real steep rocks its too slow. & whats worse, 2nd isnt low enough to give me the control i want. So im gonna change from 5.29s to 4.56s, coming down to 103.15. im hoping this will work out nicely...

if it doesnt, i get 16% better economy, & 16% more top end, so it wont be a total loss.
I guess it all depends on what tyre size you are running.When i had 33s i was at 92:1 which was perfect but now i have the 37s i needed lower gearing as i had to bump the clutch all the time to get up vertical inclines.I could not afford to ahange the diff ratios cause i would have had to but aftermarket ratios so i went wth duals.

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 2:39 pm
by CAP51Z
ZOOK60 wrote:
CAP51Z wrote:
ofr57 wrote:3.652 x 6.50 x 5.125 = 121.65725

only dreams are made of :D
i recall someone saying anything over 100 crawl ratio is useless. Im starting to agree with them. I like the 119.6 on off camber stuff, but as i found out on real steep rocks its too slow. & whats worse, 2nd isnt low enough to give me the control i want. So im gonna change from 5.29s to 4.56s, coming down to 103.15. im hoping this will work out nicely...

if it doesnt, i get 16% better economy, & 16% more top end, so it wont be a total loss.
I guess it all depends on what tyre size you are running.When i had 33s i was at 92:1 which was perfect but now i have the 37s i needed lower gearing as i had to bump the clutch all the time to get up vertical inclines.I could not afford to ahange the diff ratios cause i would have had to but aftermarket ratios so i went wth duals.

If i had 138.67 my 2nd gear would be useful. Id probably never use 1st. I run 36 ET2s, so your probably half a gear lower than me on 37s. Part of it is also PSI, as i was running 6-7 PSI, now im runnin 5PSI front & 4-4.5PSI Rear, with better grip aiding the crawlability. I still want a tad faster, so onwards i go.

Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 5:38 pm
by ofr57
do NT transfer cases have the same ratio as the WT when stock :?