Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 9:33 pm

Aussie Hardcore Wheelers
https://outerlimits4x4.com.au/
LEXX wrote:Make mine a bourbourn mate!!!!
And happy birthday for the week end, hope you had a good one.
Let's leave the situation with company 1,2,3, 56, 48, 34,23 and supps 4 and 8, yahhh I've won lotto!!! We all enjoy the same thing and let's move on as everyone has said. Gotta say it's keep us all glued to the humm of the monitor for a while. Thanx for a great debate guys.
As has been said, see ya on the trails!!!
LEXX wrote:You should see it up close mate it is certaily a TJ to behold!!! One thing I do blame FT for is my sudden infliction with the modding bug. When I first meet FT I was running pissy 31's and a 2" lift, I've now just finiseh a 5.5" lift and running 35 MT's. I am happy in a way that FT started doing his mods to his TJ because I've been able to pick up some great gear for a great price, now I just gotta save for d60's :lol:
Strange Rover wrote:The reason I am so determined to convince everybody that Fire Truck has lied and delibrately misled everybody in that thread is because this is the reason why the origional thread was removed.
I am trying to show that I didnt remove the thread just because one person was having a go at one company. If this was the reason then there would be all sorts of implications about the motives of those that control this board.
This board is here for everybody and we are not here to protect the interest of any company. And we certaintly dont moderate information that may be damaging to companies.
But, that being said, we carnt allow stuff on here that is delibratly misleading because we feel that that isnt good for the development of the board nor for anybody in the 4wding industry.
I hope that people can understand what I am trying to achieve here.
I have never typed so many words in my life but I really do need to get across the motives of why the thread was removed.
Sam
Strange Rover wrote:FireTruck wrote:Clarification: I did not know who modified the arm WHERE IT BROKE... guess I should have said it that way huh...
Oh, and I still don't know by the way.
Doh.
I now believe this but at the time of removal of the thread that wasnt my belief.
I can also understand that it wasnt your intention to cause Calbar harm by delibratly posting very little information in your first post with the title that you chose.
I just wish that this could have been handled differently by all those concerned.
Sam