Page 1 of 1

TURBO EGT OR ENGINE EGT

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 1:47 pm
by mozza
Gday all, just a query on if you guys who fit pyrometers to t/diesels if a engine temp (before turbo ) or a temp post turbo . Which is more accurate measure of tuning set up, as alot of energy is used in the turbo and results in a lower temp(turbo egt) , where as engine egt is IMO a better indication of engine health and set up......
Any info appreciated...cheers all....

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:10 pm
by tweak'e
pre turbo (ie in exaust manifold) is better as there is a temp drop across the turbo. some people have an estimation of the temp drop however i have seen it where that estimation has been out by a large amount.

imho these days with ECU controlled turbo and variable turbos becoming more comman fitting EGT sensors after the turbo is not a good idea anymore.

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:59 pm
by smurf182
Just a side note - the Exhaust Gas Recirculation port on the exhaust manifold (if fitted) makes an excellent place to put an EGT probe once you've removed the EGR system - killing two birds with one stone.

Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 10:48 am
by IBCRUSN
Definitely pre turbo and ideally as close to the inlet as practical. I have had a turbo'd petrol car and many of the aircraft I've maintained all have had TIT (Turbine Inlet Temp) indication. If you're pulling a load or making a lot of power you want to know the inlet temp. Upstream is helpful but not 100% ideal. Downstream is a waste, you'll cook the turbo and not even know it. Unless you have a lot of $$ for repairs go with the inlet.

Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:06 pm
by bucko
Mozza, I ordered an EGT this weekend and was intending to install post turbo for simplcity and assume it was reading 100 deg less. I found some great information on this site which has convinced me to change to a pre-turbo fitment.
http://www.thermoguard.com.au/instal.html
Have a read of the technical articles on that site as well.

Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:41 pm
by mozza
Cheers Bucko ,good read that one, is as I thought as far as placement and priority of egt over turbo egt, just need to pick up the hd-ft cruiser this week and start playing...
Cheers Andy

Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 9:28 pm
by Shadow
The temperature your trying to measure is basically the exhaust temperature as it leavs the exhaust valve.

The closer you can get your probe to this the better.

Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:53 am
by bastard
I rang a well known deisel shop before i fitted mine and they said after the turbo but no more than 6 inches from the waste gate,

Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:32 pm
by KaMo
IBCRUSN wrote:Definitely pre turbo and ideally as close to the inlet as practical. I have had a turbo'd petrol car and many of the aircraft I've maintained all have had TIT (Turbine Inlet Temp) indication. If you're pulling a load or making a lot of power you want to know the inlet temp. Upstream is helpful but not 100% ideal. Downstream is a waste, you'll cook the turbo and not even know it. Unless you have a lot of $$ for repairs go with the inlet.
I have to disagree with this, as EGT measurement is more for determining combustion characteristics ( overfueling etc.) than whether your going to melt your turbo, thus as close to the exhaust valve as possible is best.

Exhaust gas temps increase between cylinder outlet and turbo inlet due to the pressurisation of the gases against the nozzle ring before emission to the blades. On the engines I work with this is in the order of a 100 degree c increase. Due to the pressure drop across the turbo you then see a drop in temperature at the turbo outlet and this generally brings temps back in line with cylinder exhaust temperatures.

Here is a screen shot of a 9 cylinder engine running at 78% load showing the cylinder exhaust temperatures and pre and post turbo temperatures.

Image

Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:50 pm
by tweak'e
i think IBCRUSN is talking about petroel engines where EGT's are normally a lot higher than deisels and you can cook turbo's or burn through manifolds.

Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:49 pm
by KaMo
tweak'e wrote:i think IBCRUSN is talking about petroel engines where EGT's are normally a lot higher than deisels and you can cook turbo's or burn through manifolds.
I C...fair enough :oops:

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:22 pm
by IBCRUSN
Sorry for the delay in getting back to this.
KaMo wrote:I have to disagree with this, as EGT measurement is more for determining combustion characteristics ( overfueling etc.) than whether your going to melt your turbo, thus as close to the exhaust valve as possible is best.
Just looking at the pic attached kind of states my point that knowing the turbo inlet temp is far more important than after the turbo outlet. For the longevity of turbo inlet temp is important information.

BTW is that info from an ocean going vessel?
KaMo wrote:Exhaust gas temps increase between cylinder outlet and turbo inlet due to the pressurisation of the gases against the nozzle ring before emission to the blades. On the engines I work with this is in the order of a 100 degree c increase.
Again since my experience is not with diesels my presumptions may be a little off. Based on your statement above it sure sounds like one would want to know the temp of the gas when it gets to the T wheel not after the turbo.
KaMo wrote:Due to the pressure drop across the turbo you then see a drop in temperature at the turbo outlet and this generally brings temps back in line with cylinder exhaust temperatures.
I agree totally and it applies to all turbo charged engines. The whole premise is to take the heat energy from the exhaust to drive the turbine wheel which is a direct drive to the compressor wheel. Often one can get away with running no muffler (exhuast is reasonably quiet) if the turbo is efficient enough and extracts maximum heat.

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:28 pm
by KaMo
IBCRUSN wrote:
BTW is that info from an ocean going vessel?
Yes it is...15000 HP Anchor Handling Vessel.

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:37 pm
by RED60
Like that screen kamo...info at the fingertips...thnks.. :cool: