Page 1 of 1

suspention flex

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:18 pm
by jeanette blake
I have 92 single cab hi-lux 2.4 petrol
in the front suspention i have
parabolic springs with standard shackles
dropped drag link and was told a sliding torque rod with pro comp shocks
on rear
efs springs with one leaf taken out with pro comp shocks in /\ position with standard shackles


y can't i get flex

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:39 pm
by Z()LTAN
its all to do with shackle angle, gross weight, the efs springs and shocks


some highluxes are too light to give good flex, try lighter springs or go off road with a bit of extra weight on board

Try parabolics on the back too

Shocks may be limiting?

Oh and shackle angle is the most important!
research mate

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:40 pm
by Lux_89
Hey m8. Have you got any pics of your truck at flex so i can have a look... from what you ahve said you got it should flex relitevly well. Take another lief out of the rear, go extented shackles.. This is mine with tampered with lief packs, and standard shackles.. dont even have A frame shocks... These are same spot just different sides of the truck

Image

Image

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:57 pm
by brad 93hilux
Lux_89 wrote:Hey m8. Have you got any pics of your truck at flex so i can have a look... from what you ahve said you got it should flex relitevly well. Take another lief out of the rear, go extented shackles.. This is mine with tampered with lief packs, and standard shackles.. dont even have A frame shocks... These are same spot just different sides of the truck

Image

Image
And you would have more travel with longer shocks, i can see from the photo your shocks are at full travel and looks like the brakelines are tight also.. Jst thought i would mention

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:35 pm
by Sic Lux
here's a pamp queen pic with parabolic's in the front i found them to have a hard ride (Harder than RUF) but very flexy
Image
Image maybe take shockies of and flex it then BE CAREFULL not to stretch brake lines have a mate guide you this will show if shockies are to short

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:45 pm
by Z()LTAN
that flex is all superior shackles....

just so you know...

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:03 pm
by Luxo
Mate, Getting a hilux to flex at the front is no hard task, the rear is a different story but mainly due to the lack of weight over the rear axle. Z()LTAN is right there and with the shackle angle as well. We really need to see some pics to see what its doing/not doing

Heres mine with EFS 2" kit, overload leaf removed from rear ( will have longer shackles soon )

Image
Image


Get some pics up mate

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:24 pm
by rusty_burrows
http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa33 ... nce003.jpg
my lux with ifs rear springs with no retainers and a couple of leaves taken out and 2" shackles

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:39 pm
by Lux_89
Hey m8, yeh i no the shocks are too short, i had ironman shitboxes and they were a waste of ime, brought them longer ones for cheap and they are still too short, gonna rip them out and flex it up then get my longer ranchos, and i dont need to worry bout the brake lines,the shock stops them from braking and there is a lil movement, just eneogh. they are extended already lol but once i get the new shocks then ill have to get the new lines.. AGAIN :bad-words: Cheers guys and get some pics up so we can have a look

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:41 pm
by Lux_89
Oh and guys, not to protects siclux, but were talking about how to get it to work arnt we? So realy it dosen matter were he gets the flex from its still there? Am i right in saying so :?: Cheers

ok lets try this again

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:55 pm
by jeanette blake
ok well thanks to everyone for all there reply's but !
as it is not our truck in pic's as silly me (better half )does not know or quite understand how to get pic"s up asking son for help or some one can come show me :)
but we r reading with great interest what everyone is saying
hoping i can get some pics up soon :?
again thanks

thanks neil & jeanette
driver -----winch bitch

Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:51 am
by Sic Lux
Z()LTAN wrote:that flex is all superior shackles
rear or front :roll:

Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:30 pm
by Lux_89
I think they are talking rear and front cuz they both got superior sticker :rofl: nah back im sure. Hey neil +jannette, all you goto do to get pics up is go to www.photobucket.com, start an account wich is free, then just upload your photo's to it, then, copy the image code underneath the pic in photobucket then paste it in your reply on outers! Bit of a mouth full let me no if ya have dramas ey? Cheers

Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 10:48 pm
by Sic Lux
Yeah rear is only half open thats where i got lost as front was very flexy and rear was too stiff it's sorted out now found a happy half way

Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 11:06 pm
by Z()LTAN
yeah, the superiors on the back allow rear flex, which amplifies the already good flex on the front of a lux.

The weight on the 2 leaf design at the front worx well

but the ass end of a lux is so light that artificial flex is needed

:P

Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 11:15 pm
by Sic Lux
Now runs ruf and 2or3 less leaves in the rear so the front being a little less flexy has made the rear work better.

Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:51 pm
by Lux_89
Pics of your truck m8, waiting... :D

Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:53 pm
by Frankenyota
Hey rusty nice flex, what is your shackle angle like on the rear with the IFS springs?
Is the mount on the chassis in the original position?

I have rears with no overload springs, 2" longer shackles and track bar.
Flex is ok.

Matt