Page 1 of 1
t400 with 2500rpm stall behind a 6.2 chev V8 oiler
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 4:37 pm
by Tiny
what are people thoughts on running a t400 with a 2500rpm stally nehind a 6.2 oiler? the car is geared so I am using these kind of revs on the slow stuff anyway does anyone for see any problems with this combo??
Thanks
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:14 pm
by cloughy
They're governed at 4k and optimum torque is at about 2k, so if your like your auto fluid boiled

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:54 pm
by simkell
thats what i was thinking a little high.
about 1800 would be ideal
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:03 pm
by DIRTY ROCK STAR
Tiny if you have that TH400 im hapy to take it off your hands and you can buy one with a lower stally???
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:42 pm
by 6.5 rangie
I run around 1000 stall behind mine, works really well
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:48 pm
by Tiny
DIRTY ROCK STAR wrote:Tiny if you have that TH400 im hapy to take it off your hands and you can buy one with a lower stally???
will work something out mate, I think 1000 to 1200 would work well
thanks for the input guys
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 1:40 am
by DIRTY ROCK STAR
yeah apples dude let me know.
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 8:39 am
by Nev62
Max torque is at 1700rpm, max power is at 2600 rpm. After 10 odd yrs of R&D the automatic wharehouse settled on 1700rpm stall convetrors. They make their own and sell them but a little pricey at $1100 each.
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 10:03 am
by Gwagensteve
This is interesting Nev as it seems quite high. Maybe in a VERY heavy car it would be OK but I am pretty sure that my Dad's Hummer ran about 1200RPM from memory at 3 tonne dry.
These motors produce about 300nm from idle - it seems like a lot of wasted rev range to me, but maybe I am missing something.
Maybe in a performance application or with a turbo engine 1700 might be ideal, but for an NA it seems a bit high. I'm no expert though.
Steve.
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 11:22 am
by zagan
Quote from banks
http://bankspower.com/Tech_understandstallspeed.cfm
Let's start by illustrating how the stall speed works. Even under light loads, a vehicle with an automatic transmission will start moving as soon as you take your foot off the brake. The stall speed comes into play under all load conditions. When we talk about stall speed, we're referring to engine RPM. If the vehicle isn't moving by the time the impeller reaches the stall speed, either it will start to move, or the engine RPM will no longer increase. In other words, stall speed is the engine RPM at which the torque converter transfers the power of the engine to the transmission.
Now, let's say you need lots of power, either to make a fast getaway or to start with a heavy load. You'd rev the engine up to a point where it delivers more power before letting up on the clutch pedal. It's under those same circumstances that the stall speed becomes important. The torque converter will allow the engine to build RPM without turning the output shaft (the turbine) until the stall speed is reached.
Unlike gas engines, diesels develop massive amounts of torque (pulling power) at low RPM – enough that it's possible (and, in fact, desirable) to get a heavily-loaded diesel truck rolling by simply easing off the clutch without touching the accelerator. Banks' dynamometer tests show that Ford's 7.3 liter Power Stroke hits peak torque at 1,600 RPM and begins to drop off at around 1,850 RPM, while the Dodge's 5.9L Cummins engine peaks at 1,400 RPM and drops off at 1,800 RPM. As RPM continues to rise, torque decreases even further.
How would you translate this to a torque converter? With a low stall speed. But both the Ford and Dodge torque converters stall between 2,000 and 2,500 RPM – so with a heavy load, the torque converter won’t start turning the rear wheels until well beyond the engine's torque peak. In this case, the stall speed is too high - it is literally impossible to get the engine's full power to the rear wheels! In order to access all of the engine's potential power, the stall speed must be lowered.
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 11:50 am
by Tiny
good bit of tech there, thanks
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 12:31 pm
by Tiny
hey twon, got the box on the way, will let you know....mail me biatch