Simex 35x10.5x15 ETs weight?
Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2004 5:45 pm
Can anyone shed some light into the exact weight of this tire? Thanks.
Outer Limits 4x4 Board
Aussie Hardcore Wheelers
https://outerlimits4x4.com.au/
Simex 35x10.5x15 ETs weight?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:59 am
Anyone? Can anyone attest to the fact that they are heavier than 30KG each unmounted?
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 9:30 am
I would hazard a guess around 30kg each.
But that is from memory picking them up and mounting them months and months ago.
Just contact chris hummer and ask him.
Website is called dynamic4x4 of something...
But that is from memory picking them up and mounting them months and months ago.
Just contact chris hummer and ask him.
Website is called dynamic4x4 of something...
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 12:29 pm
my 35 inch MTRs on 15x8 rims are 35kgs. so roughly round there???
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 12:44 pm
35x12.5 Bias ply baja claws on 15x8's were 44Kg each
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:42 pm
ok guys i weighed them
35x10.5x15 centipedes way an exact 28kg not on a rim. that is a brand new tyre
35x10.5x15 centipedes way an exact 28kg not on a rim. that is a brand new tyre
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 4:11 pm
love_mud wrote:35x12.5 Bias ply baja claws on 15x8's were 44Kg each
off subject...but i thought 35" x 12.5 baja's where only radial and the bias tyre in the 35" was x13.5 only ????
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 4:31 pm
bias claws are
35x13.5
33x13.5
31x11.5
radials are
31x10.5,
33x12.5
35x12.5
35x13.5
33x13.5
31x11.5
radials are
31x10.5,
33x12.5
35x12.5
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 4:58 pm
Thanks Hottie Monster! so...decisions:
35x10.5x15 ETs = 28kg
36x13.5x15 IROK = 30kg
36x12.5x15 SXs = 35kg
Which ones to take to RFC?
35x10.5x15 ETs = 28kg
36x13.5x15 IROK = 30kg
36x12.5x15 SXs = 35kg
Which ones to take to RFC?
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 5:07 pm
DiscoDino wrote:Thanks Hottie Monster! so...decisions:
35x10.5x15 ETs = 28kg
36x13.5x15 IROK = 30kg
36x12.5x15 SXs = 35kg
Which ones to take to RFC?
isnt RFC only Jungle trekkers and Centipedes?
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 5:16 pm
hottiemonster wrote:DiscoDino wrote:Thanks Hottie Monster! so...decisions:
35x10.5x15 ETs = 28kg
36x13.5x15 IROK = 30kg
36x12.5x15 SXs = 35kg
Which ones to take to RFC?
isnt RFC only Jungle trekkers and Centipedes?
Didn't think so, just sponsered by simex???
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 5:20 pm
SX's by far.
Irocs too shallow and soft.
Irocs too shallow and soft.
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 8:20 pm
DiscoDino wrote:Thanks Hottie Monster! so...decisions:
35x10.5x15 ETs = 28kg
36x13.5x15 IROK = 30kg
36x12.5x15 SXs = 35kg
Which ones to take to RFC?
Had a good look at the Iroks, they are FUCKIGN heavy! but the sidewalls are thick. The tread felt soft though. The tread is NOT very deep, I think they would be a good rock tire, the TSL would have to be the pick of the 3...
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 9:36 pm
Yeah, I was going SX until I saw the IROKs...
Now as far as shallow tread is concerned, the Interco Site states that both the IROK 36x13.5x15 and the SX 36x12.5x15 have a tread depth of 22/32
Still debating....
Now as far as shallow tread is concerned, the Interco Site states that both the IROK 36x13.5x15 and the SX 36x12.5x15 have a tread depth of 22/32
Still debating....
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 4:05 pm
hottiemonster wrote:bias claws are
35x13.5
33x13.5
31x11.5
radials are
31x10.5,
33x12.5
35x12.5
Not true ... I HAVE 35x12.5 bias claws says so on the sidewall of the tyre
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 4:21 pm
love_mud wrote:hottiemonster wrote:bias claws are
35x13.5
33x13.5
31x11.5
radials are
31x10.5,
33x12.5
35x12.5
Not true ... I HAVE 35x12.5 bias claws says so on the sidewall of the tyre
i didnt think they came in that size, oh well, u learn something all the time.
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:12 pm
36x12.5 simex's 
Just cut some of the centre out to make them better for the mud.
I will be cutting mine when I get tired of the standard tread pattern
Or go Q78's, they have the deepest tread depth of all swampers (as well as boggers).
Just cut some of the centre out to make them better for the mud.
I will be cutting mine when I get tired of the standard tread pattern
Or go Q78's, they have the deepest tread depth of all swampers (as well as boggers).
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:16 pm
zzzz wrote:Q78's, they have the deepest tread depth of all swampers (as well as boggers).
what depth are they? even deeper than the 44" bogger?
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:20 pm
Q78 are at 27/32" tread depth.
The 36x12.5 ETs are WAY too tough to turn..a friend has them on his nitros blown SBC in Lebanon and they do NOT turn easy...not sure the Solihul crap we are running will like that. the SXs are easier to turn...dunno why?
The 36x12.5 ETs are WAY too tough to turn..a friend has them on his nitros blown SBC in Lebanon and they do NOT turn easy...not sure the Solihul crap we are running will like that. the SXs are easier to turn...dunno why?
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 6:44 pm
DiscoDino wrote:Q78 are at 27/32" tread depth.
thats huge. someone told me it was around an inch
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 10:13 pm
DiscoDino wrote:Q78 are at 27/32" tread depth.
fuck, 32inchs of tread.. thems big blocks on those tires....Cant imagine how big the tires themselves would be, around 60's!!
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 10:16 pm
bogged wrote:DiscoDino wrote:Q78 are at 27/32" tread depth.
*****, 32inchs of tread.. thems big blocks on those tires....Cant imagine how big the tires themselves would be, around 60's!!
That is a fraction u goon, works out to 21.43mm Tread depth
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 10:17 pm
MKPatrolGuy wrote:That is a fraction u goon, works out to 21.43mm Tread depth
just bored waiting for auction to end on ebay.. makes me some $$