Page 1 of 1
rear door/spare tyreshanger woes
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:49 pm
by keechox@autospeed.com
hi guys,
has anyone had problems with the rears door spare tyre hanger?
mine is slowly but surely tearing the rear door to pieces.
Has anyone made up new brackets or re-inforced it ??
seems to be very weak area
any info on what you guys have done would be greatle appreciated
cheers
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:08 pm
by want33s
There's heaps of info in the bible if you.....
Look around before you ask or you'll get flamed.
Re: rear door/spare tyreshanger woes
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:11 pm
by droopypete
keechox@autospeed.com wrote:hi guys,
has anyone had problems with the rears door spare tyre hanger?
mine is slowly but surely tearing the rear door to pieces.
Has anyone made up new brackets or re-inforced it ??
seems to be very weak area
any info on what you guys have done would be greatle appreciated
cheers
I have run 33 or 34 inch tyres for about 10 years now and I have always used a "space saver" spare (same diameter, but as skinny as I can find) I have never had a flat and my rear door is as good as new (except for a bit of rock rash
)
It is the weight that kills it, weight=leverage x bouncing = kafoockta on the rear door hinges.
I am against building a swing out tyre carrier because to make it strong enough you will be adding a lot of killograms to a vehicle that's main feature is it's light weight.
Peter.
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:32 pm
by MightyMouse
What skinny spare are you using for a 34" ?
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:05 pm
by droopypete
MightyMouse wrote:What skinny spare are you using for a 34" ?
33x9 mud terrain pumped up to the bejesus
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:09 pm
by MightyMouse
Ok- not quite as "compact" a solution as I was hoping for... may as well just run a 34x9.5 as a full size spare
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 7:04 am
by droopypete
MightyMouse wrote:Ok- not quite as "compact" a solution as I was hoping for... may as well just run a 34x9.5 as a full size spare
its not the size, it is the weight, a 33x9.5 bfg mud on a 6" rim is heaps lighter than a 34 swamper on a bead locked rim.
Peter.
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:48 am
by MightyMouse
droopypete wrote:MightyMouse wrote:Ok- not quite as "compact" a solution as I was hoping for... may as well just run a 34x9.5 as a full size spare
its not the size, it is the weight, a 33x9.5 bfg mud on a 6" rim is heaps lighter than a 34 swamper on a bead locked rim.
Peter.
Ok - still an option perhaps...... Where's the major difference the rim or the tyre ?
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:00 am
by Gwagensteve
Both.
Steve.
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:24 am
by MightyMouse
Oh well, as the rim already exists the gain isn't going to be as significant as could be - will just have to live with an undersize spare.
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:12 pm
by keechox@autospeed.com
want33s.... where in the bible is there any info about this?????? i looked before and still cant find anything
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:16 pm
by want33s
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:05 pm
by suzuki boy
I took mine off the back door for that reason! Bloody light door with no tyre on it! Bog up the holes and put it in the back!
I'm mounting mine on th eangle and cutting out the back door around it
I'll post up when i do it should look different.....
But yeah been covered heaps of times!
Re: rear door/spare tyreshanger woes
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:18 pm
by spamwell
droopypete wrote:keechox@autospeed.com wrote:hi guys,
has anyone had problems with the rears door spare tyre hanger?
mine is slowly but surely tearing the rear door to pieces.
Has anyone made up new brackets or re-inforced it ??
seems to be very weak area
any info on what you guys have done would be greatle appreciated
cheers
I have run 33 or 34 inch tyres for about 10 years now and I have always used a "space saver" spare (same diameter, but as skinny as I can find) I have never had a flat and my rear door is as good as new (except for a bit of rock rash
)
It is the weight that kills it, weight=leverage x bouncing = kafoockta on the rear door hinges.
I am against building a swing out tyre carrier because to make it strong enough you will be adding a lot of killograms to a vehicle that's main feature is it's light weight.
Peter.
mines strong enough and weights just a little bit more than the seats i took out the back.
Re: rear door/spare tyreshanger woes
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:06 pm
by droopypete
spamwell wrote:droopypete wrote:keechox@autospeed.com wrote:hi guys,
has anyone had problems with the rears door spare tyre hanger?
mine is slowly but surely tearing the rear door to pieces.
Has anyone made up new brackets or re-inforced it ??
seems to be very weak area
any info on what you guys have done would be greatle appreciated
cheers
I have run 33 or 34 inch tyres for about 10 years now and I have always used a "space saver" spare (same diameter, but as skinny as I can find) I have never had a flat and my rear door is as good as new (except for a bit of rock rash
)
It is the weight that kills it, weight=leverage x bouncing = kafoockta on the rear door hinges.
I am against building a swing out tyre carrier because to make it strong enough you will be adding a lot of killograms to a vehicle that's main feature is it's light weight.
Peter.
mines strong enough and weights just a little bit more than the seats i took out the back.
Where do you put your swag, food, recovery gear, camping gear and spares? (let alone the kids)
Peter.
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:28 pm
by Gutless
I Recently made a full tube rear bar with tube swing away, hayman reece hitch, LED's, and jerry holder and the whole contraption weighed in at 35kg.
IMO thats an acceptable gain in weight considering the advantages.
Peter
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:42 pm
by grimbo
nice
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:02 pm
by Dee
VERY nice gutless
how much for another one!!!!
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:20 pm
by Gutless
Dee wrote:VERY nice gutless
how much for another one!!!!
You Have PM.
make sure you are sitting down though
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:22 pm
by Gutless
Also made the sliders on that zook. They are stronger than Arnies and stallones lovechild
Bolt on too
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:25 pm
by droopypete
Yes, very good work
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:22 am
by dank
Gutless wrote:I Recently made a full tube rear bar with tube swing away, hayman reece hitch, LED's, and jerry holder and the whole contraption weighed in at 35kg.
IMO thats an acceptable gain in weight considering the advantages.
Peter
Man that zook is shiny!!!!
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:21 am
by Gutless
Yeah a mate of mine owns it. He REALLY looks after it!! Its probably the neatest zook I've ever seen