Page 1 of 1
lead replacement??
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 12:33 pm
by keatings
I have just bought an 85model swb 1.3lt suzi, Can I use straight unleaded or should I put in an additive to replace the lead.??
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 12:52 pm
by Spike_Sierra
an expert will probably tell me differently, but suzuki's didnt make there head out of cheese parts, and i have been running unleaded since forever. seems to be ok.
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:23 pm
by keatings
thanks mate I will give it a go and see how she performs. I just didnt want to damage a good motor. The guy I got it from says he has been using an additive forever so hopefully I wont wreck it.
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 2:12 pm
by over land 4x4
ummm i think zook's are all unleaded iv got a 85 swb and it has a stamp on the side (unleaded only)
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:27 pm
by GRPABT1
Spike_Sierra wrote:an expert will probably tell me differently, but suzuki's didnt make there head out of cheese parts, and i have been running unleaded since forever. seems to be ok.
It's usually the valves that are the worry in using unleaded in a leaded car.
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:36 pm
by Spike_Sierra
GRPABT1 wrote:Spike_Sierra wrote:an expert will probably tell me differently, but suzuki's didnt make there head out of cheese parts, and i have been running unleaded since forever. seems to be ok.
It's usually the valves that are the worry in using unleaded in a leaded car.
yeah, i should have put head, and internals(eg valves and seals)
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:42 pm
by want33s
Running unleaded in engines made for leaded fuel damages the valve seats by hammering them up into the head.
The term is 'valve seat recession'.
Suzuki's all (4 strokes)have alloy heads and therefore already have hardened valve seats (Stellite) so unleaded is fine with or without additives.