Page 1 of 1
rover front drop boxes
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:33 pm
by defmec
after sending emails to the u.s. and never getting a return im going to fab my own shock mounts and trailing arms [how hard can it be] any way i was looking at a mates Nissan when it got me thinking you could probably make a one peace cross member with links for the front radius arms lowered 2inches and that way u lower the cross member as well.......................................................good idea or bad
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:53 pm
by cloughy
Why?
Crank arms
Rotate swivel balls
don't fit a silly lift
either one of those will do
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:17 pm
by rusty_042
id say make it it suit 80 series conversion
lol
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:47 pm
by defmec
[3inch lift] with the lowerd mounts u would have less binding and more down ward travel with less of the axle walking back ive heard when u lift a fender up 3 the drive shaft will hit the cross member and Castor so this way ill hit 3 birds with one stone
cranked arms are exy and rotated swivels will limit some of the flex every one with drop boxes on there patrols say there the best option .rusty i;ll sell my rover before i,d ever put yota gear on it
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 2:47 pm
by rick130
how much travel/droop are you going for ?
I can max out the droop in a set of 10" travel shocks with a relatively stock front end.
Slotted swivels won't alter articulation either, just correct your caster.
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 4:26 pm
by cloughy
rick130 wrote:how much travel/droop are you going for ?
I can max out the droop in a set of 10" travel shocks with a relatively stock front end.
Slotted swivels won't alter articulation either, just correct your caster.
He's Listening to Nissan drivers advise about Rover suspension
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 4:31 pm
by cloughy
defmec wrote:[3inch lift] with the lowerd mounts u would have less binding and more down ward travel with less of the axle walking back ive heard when u lift a fender up 3 the drive shaft will hit the cross member and Castor so this way ill hit 3 birds with one stone
cranked arms are exy and rotated swivels will limit some of the flex every one with drop boxes on there patrols say there the best option .rusty i;ll sell my rover before i,d ever put yota gear on it
Sigh....
The bind that stops the front end articulating is in the 4 bushes to the diff hosuing, NOT the ones to the chassis, these will twist further than you ever will
Yes it will stop a little front steer, but so will cranked arms and on my lifted rovers I've never noticed front steer
It wont stop the front shaft hitting the crossmember, it will make it worse, think about it
How the hell do you reckon rotated swivels will limit flex
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:32 pm
by defmec
thats why i asked if it was a good idea or a bad one i can see your point so rotated swivels or cranked arms and no smart arse answers
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 6:31 pm
by cloughy
defmec wrote:thats why i asked if it was a good idea or a bad one i can see your point so rotated swivels or cranked arms and no smart arse answers
I've got rotated swivel hubs, never ran cranked arms, probably never will
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 6:42 pm
by defmec
thanks for the help ill go with the rotated swivels u seem to know what ur on about
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 8:06 pm
by def90
how much flex you after?
I run the simple old 80 series shocks one the front and they rarely leave the ground with only a 2" or so lift and 35's,
wat setup are you running at the mo?
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:45 pm
by GRIMACE
Cranked arms FTW!!!
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:48 pm
by def90
i think QT services in pommy land sell cranked front arms.
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:58 pm
by Micka
I had a 4" lift on my 110 and NEVER had any dramas with the front shaft hitting the cross-member. I would definitely go with the rotated swivels - though I didn't bother - just for on road manners.
And please don't listen to the Jappers about what to do with suspension on your Fender.