Page 1 of 1

Downsizing from the Cruiser

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:46 pm
by dmarsc10
G'day all.

i'm thinking of trading down from my faithfull hj60. The old girl has served me well (and still does) but i don't really need such a big vehicle (or diesel bill!). Its just me and the missus and although we do a bit of 4wding and camping, i still need to do alot of running around town.

Im considering either a sierra or a feroza.

Any thoughts on these vehicles? (i still want a reasonably capable 4wd)
Will these be cheaper to run then the cruiser?

Cheers.

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:17 pm
by Struth
Have you considered a diesal 4 Runner or Surf.

Cheers

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:28 pm
by dmarsc10
Not really, but i'm open to any ideas. just want something cheaper on juice and yeah, i dont really need a big vehicle.

i like diesels for off roading too. cheers

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:49 pm
by -Scott-
I didn't know Sierras and Ferozas came with diesels.

Perhaps you want a Rocky?

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:08 pm
by dmarsc10
they dont. what im getting at is that im not fussy..diesel or petrol, im open to ideas. just want something for about $4000ish that is reliable, capable and economical.

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:10 pm
by christo400
I ,ve had a surf 3.0lt diesel and it wasnt and they arnt very fuel efficient !
good power but used more diesel than my 4.2 diesel GQ patrol .
Ide try a pathfinder duel fuel if you want cheaper to run the early 2000mdls are a sweet truck - a rocky / feroza is very rough ride - short wheel base. - good luck

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:32 pm
by v840
What sort of offroading do you do? Sierras and ferozas are fairly disparate. Personally, I love my sierra (downsized from a GQ) but if I was doing more road driving and only light/medium off roading then would lean more towrds a Vit/Feroza.

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:33 pm
by flexytj
toyota tercel

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:38 pm
by bogged
Sierra or vitara would be fine I reckon for 2 people...

or bit more comfort, Jackaroo, but probably wont get shit for $4k

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:01 pm
by HotFourOk
Rocky's are good, and some okay ones in your price range. the 2.8 turbo diesel is the way to go and is a very good motor.

Worst thing is there is not much in the terms of modifications off the shelf for any of the Daihatsu's, Ferozas included.

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:29 pm
by Struth
Have seen some good priced pajeros lately, the early square ones.

$4k doesn't buy much but a Paj would be good value.

Cheers

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:42 pm
by RockyF75
10L/100 is not un-doable, and I generally get 11-12L/100 without really trying to feather it. Towing is another story and it drops to about 15L/100.

Comfort, well, with SWB and solid axle leaf sprung f+r, you do the math. But I hear the 1993 on shopping trolley models with IFS are real comfy, just ask nick :D

4k will get you a great late 80's one, be pushing it to get an early 90's for that much but possible. All in all a great little 4b, with the lack of lockers/crawler gears the only down side.

However a healthy lack of respect for the vehicle and right boot takes care of that :twisted: And mines held up to it fine so far :armsup:

One thing worth noting, is the really early one's are slightly longer wheelbase. Pre 1988 IIRC. 10cm I believe, doesn't sound like a lot, but I've got one of each, and the 1984 ones got a heap more boot space.

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 10:17 pm
by coxy321
This is just my opinion, here goes...

Went from an MK turbo diesel wagon to a Sierra, as i wasn't doing a whole heap of 4x4ing, and though i should "downsize". Got a WT soft top sierra, did all the usual crap to it, but ended u getting rid of it due to a) knowing the motor wasn't going to do an awful lot of kms before needing replacement; b) is wasn't big enough for two people PLUS camping gear for 2-3 days (it was, but it was TIGHT) ; c) the little 1.3 worked its arse off constantly.

The Sierra was awesome, embarrassed quite a few VERY expensive 4x4's while i had it.

I have since bought a TD42 GQ wagon - will probly hang onto this one for a while i reckon.

IMO, if you want a CHEAP car thats also CHEAP to run - go GAS. Cant go wrong. Maybe a GQ with RB30 and LPG, or TB42??? Plenty of space, accessories are cheap and plentiful, and they're a bl00dy good truck!

Coxy

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 10:38 pm
by RockyF75
coxy321 wrote:This is just my opinion, here goes...

Went from an MK turbo diesel wagon to a Sierra,
Slightly off topic, but what was the MK like on fuel?

Been thinking about an MK/MQ as a trail pig in the distant future, their cheap enough.

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:21 pm
by coxy321
It all depends on how much of a hurry you're in i suppose.....

Cant remember exactly, but i'll have a guess and say about 600km to a tank in the wagon town driving, and the MK ute/tray i had was only about 450km (poor maintenence from SLACK previous owner).

Considering that it was a 20yo motor pushing around 3T of car - it was pretty good. We did about four trips to sydney and back (1700km) with a loaded tandem "supertruck" style (no stopping) and it sat on the speed limit with no issues for 99.5% of the way. Awesome car, mine was SUPER tidy, i should never of sold it..... :cry:

And best of all for YOU, MQ/MK's are cheap as chips!! $500/ dozen is the going rate at the moment.....

Coxy

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:28 pm
by joeblow
go the vit.....good reliable vehicle.