Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Most Comfortable Tourer - Have your say

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 1254
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Sth Brissy

Most Comfortable Tourer - Have your say

Post by LuxyBoy »

RE: http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/sutra1440700.php#1440700

I want to know what you guys reckon is the best/most comfy tourer :?:

And no i don't have $205,000.00 to buy a new Unimog or even $150,000.00 for a secondhand one :cry:
http://www.unimog.com.au/index.php?id=257 Man that would be sweet though :twisted:

Must be able to sleep in the back comfortably (over 6" tall, wife can be tucked into glovebox) :!:
Must have a diesel version :!: (only buying something if i start making biodiesel)

R51 Pathfinder is winning so far as the seats all fold flat to give a longer boot space than a Patrol or 80 Series with the seats removed.
Kind Regards,
Brad
Posts: 2601
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: warner, brisbane

Post by chunderlicious »

soft tourer....

105 series IFS landcruiser
or
200 series landcruiser

oh so smooth compared to anything else, specially the 200
turbos are nice but i'd rather be blown
Posts: 1254
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Sth Brissy

Post by LuxyBoy »

Kind Regards,
Brad
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:25 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Cossie »

a na diesel is gonna make a painful tourer. Try to find something turbo'd maybe?
The hardest thing about owning a jeep is telling your parents you're g a y!!
Posts: 6029
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 9:34 pm
Location: South Australia

Post by bad_religion_au »

Factory turbo diesel 80 series, or aftermarket turbo diesel 105 series are comfy as (used heaps for my fieldwork), and still can play hard.

If IFS is acceptable, then the pathy, 100 series/200 series, paj's and Jackaroos are decent.

patrols don't ride well to me, i hated the thought of driving the 1000k's home after fieldwork the twice we did use them.

rangie/disco's are comfy, but build quality/electrics/reliability... i'll leave to you to decide.
Spit my last breath
Posts: 1143
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:11 pm
Location: Canberra

Post by chunks »

[quote="bad_religion_au"]
patrols don't ride well to me, i hated the thought of driving the 1000k's home after fieldwork the twice we did use them.
[quote]

Coil/leaf or coil/coil?
Posts: 3278
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:03 pm
Location: St Helena, Melbourne.

Post by Loanrangie »

Troopy or Defender are really the only 2 with a load space long enough to sleep in, landy electrics arent as bad as what some say especially the current ford powered defender, if you want to run homebrew bio then no current common rail diesel will like it - you want mechanical injection for that.
Saddle up tonto, its the not so loanrangie! . 98 TDI DISCO lightly modded with more to come.
Posts: 1254
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Sth Brissy

Post by LuxyBoy »

Cossie wrote:a na diesel is gonna make a painful tourer. Try to find something turbo'd maybe?
Would definately bolt one on ;)

Don't think the bio would be a problem; I think this would make good quality end product. A smaller version though as i think making over 500L at a time is a bit too much.
http://www.homebiodieselkits.com/150gadewdr.html
Kind Regards,
Brad
Posts: 6029
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 9:34 pm
Location: South Australia

Post by bad_religion_au »

chunks wrote:
bad_religion_au wrote: patrols don't ride well to me, i hated the thought of driving the 1000k's home after fieldwork the twice we did use them.

Coil/leaf or coil/coil?
coil/coil... all GU wagons. my only GQ experience was one i drove from melb - adelaide for a mate who bought it interstate. to be polite, i much rathered doing that drive in my old 45 series troopy
Spit my last breath
Posts: 675
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:06 pm
Location: campbelltown

Post by Nat84 »

Image
Tires are like boobs, they always look big until you have played with them for a while, then you just want a bigger set
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

Image

the toe rag would be nice.
Posts: 1836
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:41 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by badger »

1hdfte auto powered 80 series sahara :)
1hd-fte 5 speed tiptronic 105 series
78 series troopy for work
gu ute play truck For sale
FTE 80 series sahara Sold

i think i have a problem
Posts: 1254
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Sth Brissy

Post by LuxyBoy »

badger wrote:1hdfte auto powered 80 series sahara :)
Not that your biased :lol:
No has to be a manual i don't like autos.
Also prefer the barn doors which i think only come on the lower spec cruisers :roll:
Wonder how much a 1VD-FTV crate motor would cost to transplant into an 80 Series :idea: :lol: (the new v8 twin turbo diesel)
Kind Regards,
Brad
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

bad_religion_au wrote:
chunks wrote:
bad_religion_au wrote: patrols don't ride well to me, i hated the thought of driving the 1000k's home after fieldwork the twice we did use them.

Coil/leaf or coil/coil?
coil/coil... all GU wagons. my only GQ experience was one i drove from melb - adelaide for a mate who bought it interstate. to be polite, i much rathered doing that drive in my old 45 series troopy
You have got to be kidding .. a 25+ year old leaf sprung POS with NHV levels off all modern charts over a Coil sprung anything ..
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
User avatar
ddr
Posts: 589
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 7:44 am
Location: Not where I wanna be

Post by ddr »

bad_religion_au wrote: coil/coil... all GU wagons.
He said comfortable & he's over 6" tall.

So that wipes out the GU's, they are very cramped in the drivers seat for anyone over 5'
Im here for the sausage!
Posts: 15646
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 7:11 pm
Location: NEWCASTLE

Post by DIRTY ROCK STAR »

got the cash for one of the new V8 diesel troopys??
i havent been in one, but they appear to be the ultimate touring beast. (without buying a truck/camper)
EVERYONE LOVES A 40
www.lovells.com.au
RAW4x4
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

ddr wrote:
bad_religion_au wrote: coil/coil... all GU wagons.
He said comfortable & he's over 6" tall.

So that wipes out the GU's, they are very cramped in the drivers seat for anyone over 5'
Where do people get this stuff ??

I am 192CM (or about 6 foot 4) tall and was quite happy behind the wheel of a GU even for extended periods IE 1000+ kms a day for several years and over 150,000Kms over all.
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Posts: 4583
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Wheeling in my backyard

Post by sierrajim »

love_mud wrote:
ddr wrote:
bad_religion_au wrote: coil/coil... all GU wagons.
He said comfortable & he's over 6" tall.

So that wipes out the GU's, they are very cramped in the drivers seat for anyone over 5'
Where do people get this stuff ??

I am 192CM (or about 6 foot 4) tall and was quite happy behind the wheel of a GU even for extended periods IE 1000+ kms a day for several years and over 150,000Kms over all.
I'm 6'3" and was quite confortable in my GU as well.

The IFS T'Diesel 100 series was more comfortable to drive, towed better (GU was petrol). But the GU was far better off road.
[quote="Harb"]Well I'm guessing that they didn't think everyone would carry on like a big bunch of sooky girls over it like they have........[/quote]
Posts: 10984
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 3:47 pm
Location: Bum drilling with my buddy Ray!

Post by GRIMACE »

DIRTY ROCK STAR wrote:got the cash for one of the new V8 diesel troopys??
i havent been in one, but they appear to be the ultimate touring beast. (without buying a truck/camper)
This would be a serious option that I would consider. They are comfotable, have good shocks and the ride is nice.

The 100series IFS is a bloody shocker, my bootyfab old POS rangie was better on dirt tracks and it was 84578602" tall
As for the 200 series... never catch me in one of them. King of the ROAD (key word)!
User avatar
ddr
Posts: 589
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 7:44 am
Location: Not where I wanna be

Post by ddr »

love_mud wrote:
ddr wrote:
bad_religion_au wrote: coil/coil... all GU wagons.
He said comfortable & he's over 6" tall.

So that wipes out the GU's, they are very cramped in the drivers seat for anyone over 5'
Where do people get this stuff ??

I am 192CM (or about 6 foot 4) tall and was quite happy behind the wheel of a GU even for extended periods IE 1000+ kms a day for several years and over 150,000Kms over all.
People probably get it from sitting in one.

Im 6'5 & get very uncomfortable with my knees pressed against the dash in either the drivers seat or the passenger seat.

The 100 Series that we test drove before purchasing the gu had PLENTY of room. The GU Has less room in the drivers & Passanger seat than our 4-Runner.

Maybe the GU4 is worse than the earlier models but they certainly are not what id call roomy & comfortable.
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

LuxyBoy wrote:No has to be a manual i don't like autos.
If we're talking about a comfortable tourer in any serious way then we are talking about an auto. Saying you want a comfortable tourer then saying you want a manual just makes this thread silly imho.
This is not legal advice.
Posts: 8556
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:34 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by RockyF75 »

chimpboy wrote:
LuxyBoy wrote:No has to be a manual i don't like autos.
If we're talking about a comfortable tourer in any serious way then we are talking about an auto. Saying you want a comfortable tourer then saying you want a manual just makes this thread silly imho.
As a tourer, it seems like a bit of a mute point. Traveling down a highway or long dirt road at 80kph+, it won't really matter if your in 5th gear or in an Auto.
60 + Turbo, 33"s :armsup:
Posts: 817
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:23 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by TheOtherLeft »

Nat84 wrote:Image
Australia's most unique 4WD hey? It's a bloody landcruiser!!!!
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

RockyF75 wrote:
chimpboy wrote:
LuxyBoy wrote:No has to be a manual i don't like autos.
If we're talking about a comfortable tourer in any serious way then we are talking about an auto. Saying you want a comfortable tourer then saying you want a manual just makes this thread silly imho.
As a tourer, it seems like a bit of a mute point. Traveling down a highway or long dirt road at 80kph+, it won't really matter if your in 5th gear or in an Auto.
Just having my say :)

My experience is that touring still involves plenty of gear changes. I mean I drive a manual and love it, but I find the "I don't like autos" viewpoint to be basically an argument that inexperienced drivers make. Especially those of us who first got used to small, fast manuals when we started driving. I used to say it myself. But nobody who has driven a lot of different vehicles in a lot of different environments says "I don't like autos."

The reality is that autos are better for some things and touring is one of them.

That's my 2 cents worth.
This is not legal advice.
Posts: 1254
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Sth Brissy

Post by LuxyBoy »

chimpboy wrote:
RockyF75 wrote:
chimpboy wrote:
LuxyBoy wrote:No has to be a manual i don't like autos.
If we're talking about a comfortable tourer in any serious way then we are talking about an auto. Saying you want a comfortable tourer then saying you want a manual just makes this thread silly imho.
As a tourer, it seems like a bit of a mute point. Traveling down a highway or long dirt road at 80kph+, it won't really matter if your in 5th gear or in an Auto.
Just having my say :)

My experience is that touring still involves plenty of gear changes. I mean I drive a manual and love it, but I find the "I don't like autos" viewpoint to be basically an argument that inexperienced drivers make. Especially those of us who first got used to small, fast manuals when we started driving. I used to say it myself. But nobody who has driven a lot of different vehicles in a lot of different environments says "I don't like autos."

The reality is that autos are better for some things and touring is one of them.

That's my 2 cents worth.
I appreciate that it is your opinion but........your wrong
Autos are not better at it; it just takes less effort and doesn't fatigue you as much when driving long distance.
I have driven many vehicles of varying sizes/luxury levels, including autos on a regular bases and long distances. (old f100-auto, new accord-auto, old hilux-manual, newer elantra-manual, newer falcon-tiptronic, new RAV4-tiptronic, new lancer-tipronic, new triton-auto, old jeep-auto, etc.)
I just prefer manuals, although i would have a tipronic auto because it is the best of both worlds ;)
Kind Regards,
Brad
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

LuxyBoy wrote:I appreciate that it is your opinion but........your wrong
no, hes not wrong, its his opinion. one persons opinion cant be wrong.
Posts: 1254
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Sth Brissy

Post by LuxyBoy »

chimpboy wrote:
The reality is that autos are better for some things and touring is one of them.
Wrong and that is a statement not an opinion ;)
Kind Regards,
Brad
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

LuxyBoy wrote:I appreciate that it is your opinion but........your wrong
Autos are not better at it; it just takes less effort and doesn't fatigue you as much when driving long distance.
But you're asking about a "comfortable tourer". Surely less effort and less fatigue are a big part of "comfortable"? I know it's just matters of opinion but imho in saying you prefer a manual you are taking a big step away from the "comfortable tourer" goal. I don't mean to sound argumentative, you should get whatever tourer you want!

(But it'll be less comfortable if it's a manual).
This is not legal advice.
Posts: 1254
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Sth Brissy

Post by LuxyBoy »

chimpboy wrote:
LuxyBoy wrote:I appreciate that it is your opinion but........your wrong
Autos are not better at it; it just takes less effort and doesn't fatigue you as much when driving long distance.
But you're asking about a "comfortable tourer". Surely less effort and less fatigue are a big part of "comfortable"? I know it's just matters of opinion but imho in saying you prefer a manual you are taking a big step away from the "comfortable tourer" goal. I don't mean to sound argumentative, you should get whatever tourer you want!

(But it'll be less comfortable if it's a manual).
I understand what your saying and accept that many people would agree with you.
If i can drive a modded '91 hilux manual with WRX bucket seats for 10 hours straight up to Clermont (1hr above Emerald) i think anything else will be a big step up in comfort and the laborious effort to change gears won't really affect me.

Comfortable to me means you don't feel like your in a massage chair that has been souped up to rattle your spleen out of your body :lol:
I am even thinking about putting the air cushioned truck seats in whatever i get :armsup: head room allowing ;)

I can see your not being argumentative; we just have differing opinions :)
Kind Regards,
Brad
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

LuxyBoy wrote:
chimpboy wrote:
The reality is that autos are better for some things and touring is one of them.
Wrong and that is a statement not an opinion ;)
but its not wrong, its a true statement.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests