My Bodgy Winch Install - testing on Page 2
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:26 pm
Aussie Hardcore Wheelers
https://outerlimits4x4.com.au/
Are they pop rivets holding your fairlead on?me3@neuralfibre.com wrote:If you are bored
http://neuralfibre.com/paul/4wd/4wd-win ... the-weight
Paul
I'd be suprised if it DIDNT fail, It might take quite some time depending on use, but they will fail! Ally rivets tend to hate vibrations in a big way, they also hate expansion and contraction to do with heat.sierrajim wrote:Are they pop rivets holding your fairlead on?me3@neuralfibre.com wrote:If you are bored
http://neuralfibre.com/paul/4wd/4wd-win ... the-weight
Paul
Will be interesting to see how the alloy holds out.
You flame and complain about a lot of things and products and workmanship then go and do that?me3@neuralfibre.com wrote:If you are bored
http://neuralfibre.com/paul/4wd/4wd-win ... the-weight
Paul
on this topic... i always thought the blocks worked because the rope "sees" 9500lb tension along its entire length, so doubling it back via the block means that it applies double force (9500lb on the winch mount, 9500lb on the recovery point on the truck that the leading end is on).You need the thicker rope size if you are going to use a winch block, as it will double the pulling force - 9500×2 = 19,000lb.
I agree with this; that's exactly the point of the whole winch block approach.bad_religion_au wrote:on this topic... i always thought the blocks worked because the rope "sees" 9500lb tension along its entire length, so doubling it back via the block means that it applies double force (9500lb on the winch mount, 9500lb on the recovery point on the truck that the leading end is on).You need the thicker rope size if you are going to use a winch block, as it will double the pulling force - 9500×2 = 19,000lb.
so i thought the only part of the recovery gear that would see 19,000lb would be the block itself and what the block is anchored to.
So if I used enough snatch blocks .. I could use a shoelace ..chimpboy wrote:I agree with this; that's exactly the point of the whole winch block approach.bad_religion_au wrote:on this topic... i always thought the blocks worked because the rope "sees" 9500lb tension along its entire length, so doubling it back via the block means that it applies double force (9500lb on the winch mount, 9500lb on the recovery point on the truck that the leading end is on).You need the thicker rope size if you are going to use a winch block, as it will double the pulling force - 9500×2 = 19,000lb.
so i thought the only part of the recovery gear that would see 19,000lb would be the block itself and what the block is anchored to.
No, if you used enough snatch blocks then in theory yes, you could use very light rope. The point is that the rope is being pulled twice as fast as the vehicle is, so yes the speed is halved but so is the load on the rope.love_mud wrote:So if I used enough snatch blocks .. I could use a shoelace ..chimpboy wrote:I agree with this; that's exactly the point of the whole winch block approach.bad_religion_au wrote:on this topic... i always thought the blocks worked because the rope "sees" 9500lb tension along its entire length, so doubling it back via the block means that it applies double force (9500lb on the winch mount, 9500lb on the recovery point on the truck that the leading end is on).You need the thicker rope size if you are going to use a winch block, as it will double the pulling force - 9500×2 = 19,000lb.
so i thought the only part of the recovery gear that would see 19,000lb would be the block itself and what the block is anchored to.
There MUST be 19,000lb of force back against the object you are pulling .. action\rection etc .. the snacth block only effectively halves the winches gearing .. from say 200:1 to 400:1 .. less speed more torque.
it will reduce load on the bullbar IF the rope is attached to a recovery point on the chassis, not the bullbar.hulsty wrote:As above thats exactly how it works, reduces winch load, rope load, but WILL NOT reduce the load on the bullbar. The full load will also still exist on the chain/winch stap attached to what ever your winching from eg a tree, which is the short length in the drawing
Now imagine using the 100ft winch extension instead of the short one. That's where the 19,000 comes from.chimpboy wrote:Here is someone else's diagram:
That is how I've always understood it to work. The equal/opposite reaction concern you had is covered there as you can see.
The issue was mostly cost actually. Too cheap to buy a real bar. Alloy is more fun than steel.Evil 73 wrote:I have read some of your other "Meanderings" as you put it i have have generally thought you have done your homework and calculations on your projects, but on this one you have proved me wrong.
The channel you bought is called a PFC (Parrallel flanged channel) it should of atleast been T5 or higher, the setup you have opens the pandores box of shit to go wrong.
(1) If someone gets injured/killed while you are winching and the shit fails your insurance won't cover anything, as well as you could be liable for charges such as negligence by poor design, manslaughter etc
(2) The bar fails and you lose the car over the edge of a cliff, insurance won't cover due to defective/poor engineering
(3) If you where so worried about weight over the front axle why not install a haymen reece receiver hitch in the front and get a cradle arrangement and anderson plugs, then you can use the winch front or rear, and store it in the luggage area of your vehicle when not in use, as i read that you plan on not using it that much anyway.
(4) You could actually make the mount out of alloy but you would first have to understand the principles of the way the material is going to react once load is exertated on it.
If you would like assistance on metals and the like speak to Gwagonsteve off this forum he is very knowledgable in this area, i'm suprised he hasn't piped up yet.
You also have the advantage of driving a vehicle that lends it self to having heavy springs changed in and out with relative ease, the weight issue on the front of a 100 series in my honest opinion is a dead argument.
As for the pop rivets all i say is "SHRAPNEL........INCOMING"
Theses are generally in compression, they are not being pulled against in pretty much all the mounting ive seen over the years, they would defianteley snap if pulled in the other direction. As far as i see it have a look at the way the manufactures ARB,TJM etc mount the winches to the bars they are all in compression which then only leaves the bar itself to fail. (NOT THE POP RIVET) LOLme3@neuralfibre.com wrote:I tried to make it fail.
Ran out rope to last run on the drum.
Connected to tree uphill
Locked up Landcruiser with brakes and lockers and park
Attached Disco to landcruiser
Locked up Disco
Winched in
Mount twisted a little (I was watching it very closely)
Winch slowed
Cruiser Dragged
Strap between card came up tight
Winch slowed more
Technora (high temp) rope snapped where it was bent sharply over fairlead.
Mount showed no permanent deformation
It if breaks, it breaks
Assuming your winch is NOT mounted directly to your bar - anyone seen a strength or engineering analysis done on a metal plate mount?
Care to guess at the strength of the feet on the winch (they are alloy)
If the winch is sitting 250mm higher than the chassis rails, vs between them like this, that's a lot of twisting too. I frequently see bullbars movig up and down whilst winching, to spring back when done.
But yes, it's an experiment.
Paul
He hasn't woken up yet... fainted when he saw the pop rivetsEvil 73 wrote:If you would like assistance on metals and the like speak to Gwagonsteve off this forum he is very knowledgable in this area, i'm suprised he hasn't piped up yet.
or smacked in the head with a flying fairlead... or shot in the arse by some rivets popping.chimpboy wrote:He hasn't woken up yet... fainted when he saw the pop rivetsEvil 73 wrote:If you would like assistance on metals and the like speak to Gwagonsteve off this forum he is very knowledgable in this area, i'm suprised he hasn't piped up yet.
saves weight.nicbeer wrote:love how the hawse is bolted on but the mount is pot riveted.
No they are only bolt heads to save on weight the thread has been cut off as its too heavy, and he used some pva glue (due to its lightness) to hold the alloy hawse to the chequerplate whcih does kinda resemble the inside of an old bake bean can. (empty of course, due to weight)nicbeer wrote:love how the hawse is bolted on but the mount is pot riveted.
bru21 wrote:GOD STRUTH!!!
Thats right, but I can just see the next write up, " how to pop rivet a light alloy recovery hook to your bullbar" ahahha this is madness and using such light PFC alumnium too.bad_religion_au wrote:it will reduce load on the bullbar IF the rope is attached to a recovery point on the chassis, not the bullbar.hulsty wrote:As above thats exactly how it works, reduces winch load, rope load, but WILL NOT reduce the load on the bullbar. The full load will also still exist on the chain/winch stap attached to what ever your winching from eg a tree, which is the short length in the drawing
and in most practical cases, it will double the load on the short length, BUT as these extentions are usually similarly rated to the cable, AND they are doubled over usually (you put the block in both ends of the strap) the load is half of what the snatch block sees. of course if you use a single run of rope/chain to the anchor then it'll see the same load as the block.