Page 1 of 1
Fuel economy, Pajero verus VT commodore
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:05 am
by LINKIN
Got a new Bub on the way, actually due in couple days, Getting a new car and narrowed it down to a VT or 97ish Paj, wondering if anyone can give me a rough comparison in fuel consumption.
Thanks
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:36 am
by Dexter
What kind of driving mate, I would say that you would get about 14-15L/100KM out of the Pajero for everyday driving with some traffic. Remember its weighs two thousand kilos, so your always going to be pushing it up hill so to speak.
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 10:24 am
by LINKIN
Its for the missus, and she drives like a nanna. Maybe take to fraser or something, no real offroad driving more of a family car.
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:02 pm
by Dexter
Yeah I would say day to day driving would be around 13-14L/100kms for a manual.
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 8:02 pm
by -Scott-
I had a VT wagon company car, and used to get better than 10km/l on the highway, travelling around 110km/h. Around town, I didn't bother to check - I wasn't paying for fuel.
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 8:12 pm
by j-top paj
the VT will definately get better fuel economy than the paj
but if you want to go wheeling then the VT wont work too well
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:35 pm
by 4x4 suzi
i have a 97 2.8TD lwb paj. get 11-12L / 100km.. round town driving