GQ Dual transfer option...
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:30 pm
Hey all,
Was doing a bit of reading on the marks 4wd website and toying with the idea of going dual transfer. Now all of the figures i'm using will be for a TD42 and 3.9 diff ratios.
Standard Final drive ratio is 33.58:1
with 85% reduction gears fitted final drive ratio is 62.215:1
Now if i would go Dual transfer, without adding any reduction gears, I would have the option of going 33.58:1 AND 67.83:1 (low low)
Is all of this correct?
My question is... Why aren't more people doing this? The cost if you include the dual shifter adaptor is still less than the 85% alone. But if i go dual i get to keep my standard low range, plus have the extra low for when needed. I think fitting cost would be more but i would be able to justify that. Or am i missing something here?
http://www.marks4wd.com/products/gearma ... ual-tc.htm
Any thoughts and comments would be great.
Cheers
Rohan
Was doing a bit of reading on the marks 4wd website and toying with the idea of going dual transfer. Now all of the figures i'm using will be for a TD42 and 3.9 diff ratios.
Standard Final drive ratio is 33.58:1
with 85% reduction gears fitted final drive ratio is 62.215:1
Now if i would go Dual transfer, without adding any reduction gears, I would have the option of going 33.58:1 AND 67.83:1 (low low)
Is all of this correct?
My question is... Why aren't more people doing this? The cost if you include the dual shifter adaptor is still less than the 85% alone. But if i go dual i get to keep my standard low range, plus have the extra low for when needed. I think fitting cost would be more but i would be able to justify that. Or am i missing something here?
http://www.marks4wd.com/products/gearma ... ual-tc.htm
Any thoughts and comments would be great.
Cheers
Rohan