Page 1 of 1

td42 just blew up?

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:20 pm
by kegz
hey guys just thaught ide share some crap news, was driving down the highway doing 110km after about 15 mins she locked up, thankfully the clutch was rooted and the tyres didnt lock up just the clutch slipp and some mad drag. just before the temp gauge shot op to H and before i could slow down it was all over.

now that it home and cooled down u crank it over it starts n runs on about 4 cylinders and is sprayng diesel mist out the intake manifold before turbo (turbo is a safari kit put on 3 weeks ago and tuned.)

my educated hypothisis is that an injector has failed, dumping heaps of fuel into a cylinder and upped the internal combustion chamber temp and seeya later charlie. ill no tomorrow night when i tear it apart!!

feel free to have a guess see whos right lol

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:18 pm
by Yom
And another old motor with a turbokit attached to it bites the dust.

Not unheard of.

Its why I'm in no hurry to drop a turbo onto the side of my 270,000km old TD42.

The vehicle isn't worth an engine rebuild to me.

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:49 pm
by its aford not a nissan
hmmm dropped a valve or 2

or blew the head gasket between cylinders

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 10:17 pm
by on4tou
old engine or new some time they just don't like boost we had our full reco engine split the block on the way to cliffhanger this year coolant got in and it was all over we were just cruisin a long and it went bang egt was about 380 that engine had about 19000km :x :x on it yet the original engine had about 280000km and the turbo was fitted at 90000km it is also common for the head bolt to stretch
steve

re

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:29 am
by kegz
id be stoked if its just blown a head gaskett.

its deffinatly worth fixing mate the car has a about 5k of suspension and rims n tyres. and everything is new under it.

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:43 pm
by chunks
Geez that sucks mate, let us know the results of the post mortem!

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:46 pm
by bogged
Yom wrote:And another old motor with a turbokit attached to it bites the dust..
I dont see where he mentioned a yr model, or klms.

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:15 am
by oondy
on4tou wrote:....on the way to cliffhanger this year....... egt was about 380........
steve
were you towing a trailer?

mine sits on about 250 at 100, maybe 300 at 110km/h (33 MTZ, 4" sus, 30mm body lift) and thats with a real small exhaust housing too.

cheers

OONDY

re

Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:20 pm
by kegz
1989 maverick
350,000kms
11psi
tuned by queenbeyan diesel
not towwing
had 4 ppl on the car
doing 110-115km

re

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:04 pm
by kegz
righteo guys

number 3 piston picked up in the bore and is farked... lol engines for sale if anyone want to build up a new one pump n injectors the lot.

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:26 pm
by love ke70
how new/old are the pump and injectors?

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:44 pm
by stool
So what engine are you thinking of replacing it with

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 8:31 pm
by oldmate
stool wrote:So what engine are you thinking of replacing it with
450 chev sounds good

re

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 8:53 pm
by kegz
not sure when they were done so yeh

i got an injected 5 litre sitting here ready to go.

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:50 am
by macorti
So guys based on your experience and taking in count this example of engine failure, you think is not safe to turbo a TD42 with near 350K???

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:33 am
by figjam_1985
did mine at 380 000 only running 10psi, seems to be going strong, i dont drive it hard, never have cause i know she is old. Its been on there for 6 months so far no dramas, i had the engine checked over though, tappets adjusted, all measurments taken, valve clearances checked, had the big end and bearings checked, i assumed i may need an engine rebuild, i was basically told that it had been looked after so well since day one that nothing was out of spec. Im only the 2nd owner of the GQ, as a Ma and Pa kettle owned it before me and treated it like royalty.

Honestly IMHO, i believe the only way to avoid catastophic failure is to have the motor checked over before you do it, and avoid excessive boost, unless of course you have the cash to keep rebuilding motors :twisted: :P

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:37 am
by mkpatrol
macorti wrote:So guys based on your experience and taking in count this example of engine failure, you think is not safe to turbo a TD42 with near 350K???

As figjam said, it depends on how the engine is looked after to how long it will last.

I have a friend with a 91 model that has had a turbo on it since 5,000km & it has well over 600,000km on it (680 I think) & it is still going strong.

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:09 am
by nastytroll
mkpatrol wrote:
macorti wrote:So guys based on your experience and taking in count this example of engine failure, you think is not safe to turbo a TD42 with near 350K???

As figjam said, it depends on how the engine is looked after to how long it will last.

I have a friend with a 91 model that has had a turbo on it since 5,000km & it has well over 600,000km on it (680 I think) & it is still going strong.
I agree, before fitting the turbo kit you could do a compression check. I would pull the sump off to do the turbo oil drain, so why not through a set of big ends and mains into it.

I would not say its common for td42's to shit themselves, but a result of poor maintenance and abuse.

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 10:15 pm
by Burra Boy
I bolted an AXT to my 1990 leafie at 260K, has since done the Simmo in late October in 40 degrees, now has 312K, no problems at all. Famous last words....

Am about to bolt a Denso top mount and an IC to my 1989 LWB with 360K. We will see.... :twisted:

Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 6:02 am
by macorti
nastytroll wrote:
mkpatrol wrote:
macorti wrote:So guys based on your experience and taking in count this example of engine failure, you think is not safe to turbo a TD42 with near 350K???

As figjam said, it depends on how the engine is looked after to how long it will last.

I have a friend with a 91 model that has had a turbo on it since 5,000km & it has well over 600,000km on it (680 I think) & it is still going strong.
I agree, before fitting the turbo kit you could do a compression check. I would pull the sump off to do the turbo oil drain, so why not through a set of big ends and mains into it.

I would not say its common for td42's to shit themselves, but a result of poor maintenance and abuse.
Yes it seems that all depends on how the engine has been looked after. Do you guys think that a low compression engine could give another signs that will let you know about the issue?

Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 8:13 am
by nastytroll
low compression indicates ring bypass, if the compression is on the low side I would check the bores and re-ring the motor.

A mate just pulled the head off a td42 with 560,000km on it and it still had hone marks in the bores.

They are a understressed motor and will run happy aslong as they are serviced.

A mates dad had a farm and had 960,000km on a 1996 td42 ute, still ran fine when he sold it.

Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 1:17 pm
by Big Red Toy
Mine also went after 16,000kms after a reco, no special rebuild just standard.
Might of been the boost i was running :roll:

This time will get built up for the boost me thinks :lol:

Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 6:01 pm
by nastytroll
How much boost? Its not normally the boost thats the issue but fuel.

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:46 am
by Big Red Toy
yeah true, was never setup right out of pure lazyness
oh well, we learn from mistakes ...

but god damm did it fly :lol: :lol: :lol: