Bore and Stroke TB42.
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:46 pm
Has this been done?
How far can it be taken, how much (approximately) and is it worth it?
How far can it be taken, how much (approximately) and is it worth it?
TB42 - 96 x 96bigbluemav wrote:Yeah, I know. It was just a brain fart kind of query really.
BUT, TB42's are ultra cheap and widely considered the strongest of all TB's, including TB48E.
I've been quoted $2200 for a TB45E, 2nd hand with all electronics required for a conversion into a GQ. I assume a TB48E would be at least double that.
I've seen TB42's for giveaway to $750, which leaves a bit for machining and parts. If someone had the info (how much to stroke crank, rods to use, pistons to use etc, how far it can be bored/sleeved, head work to lower compression because of increase swept volume) you'd end up with a rebuilt, big cube motor for a reasonable cost.
You'd make it pretty stock, just to take advantage of the extra cubes and associated torque.
I have a vague memory (at the time I had a TD42 so didn't take any notice) of one that had been stroked to 5 litres.
Does anyone know the bore and stroke of the TB48E compared with TB42?
Dave Mc
Ta Mickmickyd555 wrote:TB42 - 96 x 96bigbluemav wrote:Yeah, I know. It was just a brain fart kind of query really.
BUT, TB42's are ultra cheap and widely considered the strongest of all TB's, including TB48E.
I've been quoted $2200 for a TB45E, 2nd hand with all electronics required for a conversion into a GQ. I assume a TB48E would be at least double that.
I've seen TB42's for giveaway to $750, which leaves a bit for machining and parts. If someone had the info (how much to stroke crank, rods to use, pistons to use etc, how far it can be bored/sleeved, head work to lower compression because of increase swept volume) you'd end up with a rebuilt, big cube motor for a reasonable cost.
You'd make it pretty stock, just to take advantage of the extra cubes and associated torque.
I have a vague memory (at the time I had a TD42 so didn't take any notice) of one that had been stroked to 5 litres.
Does anyone know the bore and stroke of the TB48E compared with TB42?
Dave Mc
TB48 - 99.5 x 102
same bore and stroke as the TD42bigbluemav wrote:Ta Mickmickyd555 wrote:TB42 - 96 x 96bigbluemav wrote:Yeah, I know. It was just a brain fart kind of query really.
BUT, TB42's are ultra cheap and widely considered the strongest of all TB's, including TB48E.
I've been quoted $2200 for a TB45E, 2nd hand with all electronics required for a conversion into a GQ. I assume a TB48E would be at least double that.
I've seen TB42's for giveaway to $750, which leaves a bit for machining and parts. If someone had the info (how much to stroke crank, rods to use, pistons to use etc, how far it can be bored/sleeved, head work to lower compression because of increase swept volume) you'd end up with a rebuilt, big cube motor for a reasonable cost.
You'd make it pretty stock, just to take advantage of the extra cubes and associated torque.
I have a vague memory (at the time I had a TD42 so didn't take any notice) of one that had been stroked to 5 litres.
Does anyone know the bore and stroke of the TB48E compared with TB42?
Dave Mc
TB48 - 99.5 x 102
WHo would have thought a TB42 was a square bore x stroke. The numbers seems SO small when you look at them!!
How much extra bore for a 5.0? Would a TB48E crank fit, or best to just stroke the original?
Ta for the info!!
I just like the idea of it!gouldy wrote:There is a gq patrol here in Broken Hill and the TB42 has been stroked to 4.9L by regrinding the original crank etc. Not sure on the other specs,but it does seem to go well. Raced in the 08 Aus Safari. Its white and has PWR plastered down the side of it. There is a quick video of it in the 07 or 08 condo 750 on you tube.
Hi LockeeLOCKEE wrote:Speak to Sandy at AUS4WD, he has done a lot of homework on this.
Best to call him 0414 288 399bigbluemav wrote:Hi LockeeLOCKEE wrote:Speak to Sandy at AUS4WD, he has done a lot of homework on this.
Do you have a web contact for Sandy?
create wrote:TB42: bore 96mm, stroke 96mm
TB45: bore 99.5mm, stroke 96mm
TB48: bore 99.5mm, stroke 102mm
I'm guessing that TB42 and TB45 use the same crank? Could I use a TB48 crank in a TB42? Would it be a straight swap? Is the block on all three engines essentially the same? Can you put a TB48 head on a TB42? What parts are interchangable?
If the TB family have the same block, there would be enough space to have 100mm bores. Could a TB42 block just have bigger liners put in? How much would this cost approx?brad-chevlux wrote:create wrote:TB42: bore 96mm, stroke 96mm
TB45: bore 99.5mm, stroke 96mm
TB48: bore 99.5mm, stroke 102mm
I'm guessing that TB42 and TB45 use the same crank? Could I use a TB48 crank in a TB42? Would it be a straight swap? Is the block on all three engines essentially the same? Can you put a TB48 head on a TB42? What parts are interchangable?
96 X 102 would give a capacity of 4.431L
its true don't even have to measure you can see it by eye, 4.5 tend to bend with 15psi or less...4.8 went back to good gear...and its true money wasted turbo even at low boost on stock motor cost less and will make much more power.Brett S wrote:tb48 completely different configuration motor. ohc vs ohv...
As stated previously what you need to find out is whether you have enough material avail to run last oversize tb45 pistons in your tb42.
Apparantly the tb42 rods are stronger than tb45 but never seen this proven.
To evolve the thread, not knowing much about turbo petrols, what would be good setup to get MAXIMUM low range power/torque?NutterGQ wrote:its true don't even have to measure you can see it by eye, 4.5 tend to bend with 15psi or less...4.8 went back to good gear...and its true money wasted turbo even at low boost on stock motor cost less and will make much more power.Brett S wrote:tb48 completely different configuration motor. ohc vs ohv...
As stated previously what you need to find out is whether you have enough material avail to run last oversize tb45 pistons in your tb42.
Apparantly the tb42 rods are stronger than tb45 but never seen this proven.