Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

gq swb wheelbase extension

Tech Talk for Nissan owners.

Moderators: toaddog, V8Patrol

Post Reply
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:18 pm
Location: Yeppoon CQ

gq swb wheelbase extension

Post by swb_ute »

Can anyone please post some pics of a swb wheelbase extension thats has been done just want to see all the mounts that have been moved?
and can it be passed in QLD?

Cheers
Ben
Posts: 1350
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:48 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast - Brisbane

Post by money_killer »

can i ask why u want to extend it, and by how much ?
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:18 pm
Location: Yeppoon CQ

extension

Post by swb_ute »

To make it a bit more stable and better departure angle. Want to move it back by about 300mm.
Posts: 4275
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by ozy1 »

do you plan on keeping the cab or are you converting t a ute at the same time?
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:18 pm
Location: Yeppoon CQ

ute

Post by swb_ute »

Going to put a ute cab on
Posts: 721
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:01 pm
Location: on top of a large pile of rocks

Post by AFeral »

Anything is possible, it just comes down to time and money.
Ferals build www.outerlimits4x4.com/ftopic164570.php
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:18 pm
Location: Yeppoon CQ

Link

Post by swb_ute »

Good link but dont want to chop the chassis as i have been told its harder to get mod plate for a chassis extension over moving the mounts back is this right?
Posts: 4275
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by ozy1 »

i think the better way to do this is to move the coil mounts back on the chassis and fit longer links, might as well go 4 link at the same time, or worst case fit a new panhard mont, fit a new shock brace and relocated fuel tank,

its the way i did mine, but im in NSW,
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:18 pm
Location: Yeppoon CQ

Post by swb_ute »

ozy1 wrote:i think the better way to do this is to move the coil mounts back on the chassis and fit longer links, might as well go 4 link at the same time, or worst case fit a new panhard mont, fit a new shock brace and relocated fuel tank,

its the way i did mine, but im in NSW,
Hey ozzy1 would i be able to get some closeup pics of your extension please would really like to see how you braced the coil mounts?

Cheers
Benny
Posts: 4275
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by ozy1 »

ill look for some, and if i cant find them ill take some tomorrow,
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:18 pm
Location: Yeppoon CQ

Post by swb_ute »

Thanks very much ozy1
Posts: 352
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2002 9:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by 65Mog »

I've seen this done both ways and cutting the chassis in the middle and adding a piece in is the best and neatest way to do it. If it's done properly the join will be the strongest part of the chassis.
Posts: 4275
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by ozy1 »

65Mog wrote:I've seen this done both ways and cutting the chassis in the middle and adding a piece in is the best and neatest way to do it. If it's done properly the join will be the strongest part of the chassis.
what makes you think its the neatest? please explain,

i will admit, we left the original coil mounts in place, so we can always run a standard shorty wheel base, which we will never do again, a bit longer is absolutely awesome,

plus, chopping the chassis and adding a section really does nothing for his depature angle now does it?
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:03 pm
Location: Rockhampton QLD

Post by ELF_83 »

im almost finished doing my shortyjust have to weld in the shock mounts and make a new rear floor pan, so you can come have alook at one in the flesh if you want. I get back to town on moday morning and go back to work friday arve so anytime this week is ok.
GQ SWB
Twin Turbo
F & R Air lockers
Roll Cage
Loose Nut Behind the Wheel

LOOKING FOR SPONSORS???
mum can't afford it anymore! hahaha
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:03 pm
Location: Rockhampton QLD

Post by ELF_83 »

also my opinion only 12 inches is too mush you might as well go buy a wagon chassis and just trim the back off behind the panhard mount. When you get into it a small amount makes a big difference.
GQ SWB
Twin Turbo
F & R Air lockers
Roll Cage
Loose Nut Behind the Wheel

LOOKING FOR SPONSORS???
mum can't afford it anymore! hahaha
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:18 pm
Location: Yeppoon CQ

how much

Post by swb_ute »

how much did you do on yours?
Yom
Posts: 1233
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:13 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Yom »

ELF_83 wrote:also my opinion only 12 inches is too mush you might as well go buy a wagon chassis and just trim the back off behind the panhard mount. When you get into it a small amount makes a big difference.
Except for someone who's been wheeling with the shorty for a while, the LWB will be too much of a barge.

That is assuming they dont want to add a teaspoon of concrete to their morning cuppa of course. :P
Posts: 4275
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by ozy1 »

here ya go mate, pics of my setup, i went back 16" which took the wheel base out to 110" up from 94" i found this to be an awesome improvement,

Image
Image
Image
Image
Posts: 1857
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:16 am
Location: ipswich

Post by nastytroll »

I was goin to go to 112" wb. I have driven 102" and its too short.
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:18 pm
Location: Yeppoon CQ

Thanks

Post by swb_ute »

Thanks heaps for going to the trouble of taking those pics ozy1 they are a great help.

Cheers
Ben
Posts: 4275
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by ozy1 »

not a problem, if you have anything specific you want pics or details on just ask,

just so you know my lower links are 1050long with an A Fame, longest ranchos i could source, with coils retained top and bottom,
Posts: 352
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2002 9:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by 65Mog »

ozy1 wrote:
65Mog wrote:I've seen this done both ways and cutting the chassis in the middle and adding a piece in is the best and neatest way to do it. If it's done properly the join will be the strongest part of the chassis.
what makes you think its the neatest? please explain,

i will admit, we left the original coil mounts in place, so we can always run a standard shorty wheel base, which we will never do again, a bit longer is absolutely awesome,

plus, chopping the chassis and adding a section really does nothing for his depature angle now does it?
It's neater because if it's done right 90% of people would never pick it, that's what I was trying to say. In my opinion adding a piece in the middle is the better way to do it. Your opinion is different to mine, but this guy asked a question and I gave him my opinion just like you did.
Banned
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by lolergram »

ozy1 wrote:not a problem, if you have anything specific you want pics or details on just ask,

just so you know my lower links are 1050long with an A Fame, longest ranchos i could source, with coils retained top and bottom,
Ozy, just out of interest, which chassis did you cut them coil mount sections out of?

They fit quite nicely and look very neat!
:cool:
Don't expect to see my recipe, until I receive my cheque and collection fee
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:18 pm
Location: Yeppoon CQ

Post by swb_ute »

65Mog wrote:
ozy1 wrote:
65Mog wrote:I've seen this done both ways and cutting the chassis in the middle and adding a piece in is the best and neatest way to do it. If it's done properly the join will be the strongest part of the chassis.
what makes you think its the neatest? please explain,

i will admit, we left the original coil mounts in place, so we can always run a standard shorty wheel base, which we will never do again, a bit longer is absolutely awesome,

plus, chopping the chassis and adding a section really does nothing for his depature angle now does it?
It's neater because if it's done right 90% of people would never pick it, that's what I was trying to say. In my opinion adding a piece in the middle is the better way to do it. Your opinion is different to mine, but this guy asked a question and I gave him my opinion just like you did.
Would you be able to show some pics of this done and the process on how to do it right??
Posts: 4275
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by ozy1 »

lolergram wrote:
ozy1 wrote:not a problem, if you have anything specific you want pics or details on just ask,

just so you know my lower links are 1050long with an A Fame, longest ranchos i could source, with coils retained top and bottom,
Ozy, just out of interest, which chassis did you cut them coil mount sections out of?

They fit quite nicely and look very neat!
:cool:
the coil mounts are GQ, i picked up some 6mm, RHS, and cut one side out of it to get the chassis level, the engineer though it was a good idea when i told him about the plan,
Posts: 352
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2002 9:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by 65Mog »

swb_ute wrote:
65Mog wrote:
ozy1 wrote:
65Mog wrote:I've seen this done both ways and cutting the chassis in the middle and adding a piece in is the best and neatest way to do it. If it's done properly the join will be the strongest part of the chassis.
what makes you think its the neatest? please explain,

i will admit, we left the original coil mounts in place, so we can always run a standard shorty wheel base, which we will never do again, a bit longer is absolutely awesome,

plus, chopping the chassis and adding a section really does nothing for his depature angle now does it?
It's neater because if it's done right 90% of people would never pick it, that's what I was trying to say. In my opinion adding a piece in the middle is the better way to do it. Your opinion is different to mine, but this guy asked a question and I gave him my opinion just like you did.
Would you be able to show some pics of this done and the process on how to do it right??
Sorry I don't have any close pictures of it actually being done, but I've sent you a PM with some pictures of the patrol in question.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests