Page 1 of 1

triangulated 4 link question

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:05 pm
by hiluxmad
first off i am new to custom coil setups....
does a trianulated 4 link need a panhard??

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:12 pm
by simcoz
No it does'nt
try this for starters http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthre ... oll+centre

Re: triangulated 4 link question

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:43 am
by tim
hiluxmad wrote:first off i am new to custom coil setups....
does a trianulated 4 link need a panhard??
4 link with a panhard will just bind. 4 link does not move through the same lateral arc that a panhard does and they fight each other.

Tim

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:54 am
by joeblow
no panhard.

Image

Image

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:42 pm
by hiluxmad
cheers guys
i am looking at this set up in the rear of a ute chopped 60 series with a lexus v8.
what would be the better setup for the front 5 link or standard 3 link like GQ or 80 series?

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:01 pm
by Tiny
hiluxmad wrote:cheers guys
i am looking at this set up in the rear of a ute chopped 60 series with a lexus v8.
what would be the better setup for the front 5 link or standard 3 link like GQ or 80 series?
a triangulated 4 link set up is triangulted to negate the need for a panhard thus allowing more movement, a 4 link plus panhard is a 5 link...sort of, I am sure you get my drift.

I would go try 3 link + panhard front, the patrol and cruiser front set up is a radius arm set up, not really a link set up in the manner you are thinking and if you are going to the trouble of a complete custom set up, a radius arm set up is a waste of time and effort.

you can 5 link the front, but I am not a fan of 5 link fronts personally, if you want a radius amr set up, I would look at going for an xlink set up on it from the start or you will end up dissapointed

my2c for ya :lol:

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:32 pm
by mule75
Tiny wrote:
hiluxmad wrote:cheers guys
i am looking at this set up in the rear of a ute chopped 60 series with a lexus v8.
what would be the better setup for the front 5 link or standard 3 link like GQ or 80 series?
a triangulated 4 link set up is triangulted to negate the need for a panhard thus allowing more movement, a 4 link plus panhard is a 5 link...sort of, I am sure you get my drift.

I would go try 3 link + panhard front, the patrol and cruiser front set up is a radius arm set up, not really a link set up in the manner you are thinking and if you are going to the trouble of a complete custom set up, a radius arm set up is a waste of time and effort.

you can 5 link the front, but I am not a fan of 5 link fronts personally, if you want a radius amr set up, I would look at going for an xlink set up on it from the start or you will end up dissapointed

my2c for ya :lol:

I'm not trying to disagree but more wondering why you would think that a radius arm setup be a waste of time?
if i was doing a coil conversion i think i would go that way using all stock 80/100 front end stuff. i would sacrifice some travel for higher speed handling. more aiming at an all round trail rig and not a comp truck which needs to be towed everywhere.


horses for courses....

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:54 pm
by Tiny
mule75 wrote:
Tiny wrote:
hiluxmad wrote:cheers guys
i am looking at this set up in the rear of a ute chopped 60 series with a lexus v8.
what would be the better setup for the front 5 link or standard 3 link like GQ or 80 series?
a triangulated 4 link set up is triangulted to negate the need for a panhard thus allowing more movement, a 4 link plus panhard is a 5 link...sort of, I am sure you get my drift.

I would go try 3 link + panhard front, the patrol and cruiser front set up is a radius arm set up, not really a link set up in the manner you are thinking and if you are going to the trouble of a complete custom set up, a radius arm set up is a waste of time and effort.

you can 5 link the front, but I am not a fan of 5 link fronts personally, if you want a radius amr set up, I would look at going for an xlink set up on it from the start or you will end up dissapointed

my2c for ya :lol:

I'm not trying to disagree but more wondering why you would think that a radius arm setup be a waste of time?
if i was doing a coil conversion i think i would go that way using all stock 80/100 front end stuff. i would sacrifice some travel for higher speed handling. more aiming at an all round trail rig and not a comp truck which needs to be towed everywhere.


horses for courses....
there is no reason you cant have a well set up 3 link + panhard or 5 link set up capable of decent speeds and handling, bearing in mind you are talking about a modified 4wd built for offroad, not a sports car built for laps around a track.

I am all for radius arm set ups staying on vehicles rather than riping them out and putting in cutom set ups unless it is a comp rig, I think you can comprimise a few things, and flex isn;t everything, but if you are going to the effort of ripping all the current suspension out in favour of a custom set up, radius arm sets up to me are a waste of time.

why rip out a leaf set up for a coil set up that has no better flex and marginally better ride? may as well have the marginally better ride AND fully sik flex dudes :twisted:

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:58 pm
by Zeyphly

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:46 pm
by kond
Could this kit be made to suit a coil conversion to the rear on a nissan patrol gu coil front leaf rear

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:18 pm
by Tiny
kond wrote:
Could this kit be made to suit a coil conversion to the rear on a nissan patrol gu coil front leaf rear
dont see why not, get some measurments and check it out......the rear \ diff support should be fine, the angles of the links in relation to where they would sit on the chassis \ crosmembers would be different, but fairly easy to make suitable braketry I would think

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 6:14 pm
by chunderlicious
for 2G someone will custom make a rear end fit it for you.

Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:16 am
by WICKED
Mate of mine made his own 3-link using the above link and it was well less than $2g!

Image

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:32 am
by Bagdad mafia
Hey all im looking at putting a 4 link in the rear of my hilux

Can i run just the upper arms in a triangle using arms 850mm long with seperation of 850mm at the end of the arms on the chassis end

they are roughly on a 53degree angle on the inside of the triangle

i may hvae made this confusing but its a bit hard to explain in writing[/img]

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:43 am
by KiwiBacon
WICKED wrote:Mate of mine made his own 3-link using the above link and it was well less than $2g!
He's got leaves in the front.

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:33 am
by v840
Bagdad mafia wrote:Hey all im looking at putting a 4 link in the rear of my hilux

Can i run just the upper arms in a triangle using arms 850mm long with seperation of 850mm at the end of the arms on the chassis end

they are roughly on a 53degree angle on the inside of the triangle

i may hvae made this confusing but its a bit hard to explain in writing[/img]

The general rule of thumb is that you need a minimum of 45deg. triangulation in your links to sufficiently reduce flex steer. You seem to have that covered however there is a lot more to it than just that. Personally I would try to get a bit of angle on the lowers too. But that's me.


Roll axis, IC, AS etc. etc. all has to be taken in to consideration too. Get the 4-link calculator if you haven't already.

http://mysite.verizon.net/triaged/fi...rLinkV3.1d.zip

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:52 am
by Bagdad mafia
Thanks v840

ill have a play around with angles on both arms before i confirm my setup

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:18 am
by WICKED
KiwiBacon wrote:
WICKED wrote:Mate of mine made his own 3-link using the above link and it was well less than $2g!
He's got leaves in the front.
And?

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:38 am
by KiwiBacon
WICKED wrote:
KiwiBacon wrote:
WICKED wrote:Mate of mine made his own 3-link using the above link and it was well less than $2g!
He's got leaves in the front.
And?
Presuming he's not finished yet.