Long Range Tank for NG Pajero questions??
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:50 pm
Hi all, I wanted to ask a question about Long Range Fuel Tanks for the last of the older Pajeros (with rear coil springs). For my birthday next wednesday, I will be having a new replacement tank fitted (in the next month or two) and I have narrowed my decision down to one of two tanks. ARB LongRanger (146) or 4WD systems (132). I also want to by a new aftermarket or genuine fuel sender unit so the fuel readings can be a bit more accurate than they are now...
With the Long Ranger 146L tank, they have received alot of positive feedback from lots of different forums, but I want to know if this tank would fit ok with a 2.5" exhaust and some big bore 41mm shock absorbers. How do you reckon my Pajero would manage, fitted with aftermarket EFS coil springs, 146 litres of fuel, 5 passengers and fully loaded on a corregated outback road? Do you think the long range tank would effect my driveability? A guy from ARB said that he is not sure whether this tank would actually fit under my car because of the larger exhaust and (soon to be fitted) bigger shockers...
With the 132 litre 4WD Systems fuel tank, the guy over the phone says that he has absolutely no doubt that their fuel tank would fit with no troubles whatsoever. The feedback received from ather forum users is 50/50. Should I be concerned about the build quality or reliability of the 4WD Systems fuel tanks?
Worst case scenario would be about 15.3 L/100km or 6.5 km/L on a rough 4WD track. This would give me a range of 949km with Long Ranger or 858km with 4WD Systems.
Best case scenario would be 8.7 L/100km or 11.5 km/L on the open highway cruising at a sensible speed. This would give me a range of 1679km with Long Ranger or 1518km with 4WD Systems.
The price quoted to me for the Long Ranger (here in Melbourne where I live) is $1179 fitted, excluding the tank of fuel to fill it up. The price quoted for the 4WD Systems tank (in Adelaide, 9 hours drive away excluding fuel to get there) is $1149 fitted, excluding fuel fiil-up.
We have close friends in Adelaide and have a place to stay and don't have any problem with driving their if the 4WD Systems tank is worth it (that's if the Long Ranger tank doesn't fit under mine).
Any advice would be greatly apprieciated......... Thanks, Sam
With the Long Ranger 146L tank, they have received alot of positive feedback from lots of different forums, but I want to know if this tank would fit ok with a 2.5" exhaust and some big bore 41mm shock absorbers. How do you reckon my Pajero would manage, fitted with aftermarket EFS coil springs, 146 litres of fuel, 5 passengers and fully loaded on a corregated outback road? Do you think the long range tank would effect my driveability? A guy from ARB said that he is not sure whether this tank would actually fit under my car because of the larger exhaust and (soon to be fitted) bigger shockers...
With the 132 litre 4WD Systems fuel tank, the guy over the phone says that he has absolutely no doubt that their fuel tank would fit with no troubles whatsoever. The feedback received from ather forum users is 50/50. Should I be concerned about the build quality or reliability of the 4WD Systems fuel tanks?
Worst case scenario would be about 15.3 L/100km or 6.5 km/L on a rough 4WD track. This would give me a range of 949km with Long Ranger or 858km with 4WD Systems.
Best case scenario would be 8.7 L/100km or 11.5 km/L on the open highway cruising at a sensible speed. This would give me a range of 1679km with Long Ranger or 1518km with 4WD Systems.
The price quoted to me for the Long Ranger (here in Melbourne where I live) is $1179 fitted, excluding the tank of fuel to fill it up. The price quoted for the 4WD Systems tank (in Adelaide, 9 hours drive away excluding fuel to get there) is $1149 fitted, excluding fuel fiil-up.
We have close friends in Adelaide and have a place to stay and don't have any problem with driving their if the 4WD Systems tank is worth it (that's if the Long Ranger tank doesn't fit under mine).
Any advice would be greatly apprieciated......... Thanks, Sam